Advertisement

Evaluation of the Impact of the Changing the Term of Tax Liability Performance on Tax Receipts by Minmax Composition Method

  • A. A. Musayeva
  • T. M. Musayev
  • M. Kh. GazanfarliEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 896)

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of methods that enable the selection of the most suitable one of the many possible options based on the theory of fuzzy logic in the process of changing tax obligation period. Applied methods analyze factors reflecting the activities of tax authorities or taxpayers in uncertainty, choosing the most appropriate decision to reduce the loss of state budget and the risks.

Keywords

Fuzzy sets Decision-making Multi-criteria selection Tax liability Tax policy 

References

  1. 1.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods. A Comparative Study (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fishburn, P.C.: Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Set: Applications to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research Society of America (ORSA), Baltimore (1967)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saaty, T.L., Peniwati, K.: Group Decision Making: Drawing out and Reconciling Differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohanec, M., Bratko, I., Rajkovič, V.: An expert system for decision-making. In: Sol, H.G. (ed.) Processes and Tools for Decision Making, pp 235–248. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohanec, M.: DEXi: A Program for Multi-Attribute Decision Making (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rezaei, J.: Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53, 49–57 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rezaei, J.: Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega 64, 126–130 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacek, Z.: Comparative analysis of multiple criteria evaluations of suppliers in different industries. In: 18th Euro working Group on Transportation, EWGT 2015, Delft, The Netherlands (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jaini, N.I., Utyuzhnikov, S.V.: A fuzzy trade-off ranking method for multi-criteria decision-making. Axioms 7(1), 1 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Musayev, A.F.: Economic problems of tax policy. CBS “Poliqraphic Production”, Baku (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Musayev, A.F., Madatova, Sh.G., Rustamov, S.S.: Evolution of the impact of the tax legislation reforms on the tax potential by fuzzy inference method. In: 12th International Conference on Application of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing (ICAFS), Vienna, pp. 507–514. Elsevier (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Musayev, A.F., Madatova, Sh.G., Rustamov, S.S.: Mamdani-type fuzzy inference system for evaluation of tax potential. In: Sixth World Conference on Computing dedicated to 50th Anniversary of Fuzzy Logic and Applications and 95th Birthday Anniversary of Lotfi A. Zadeh, Berkley, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    The Tax Code of Azerbaijan Republic (2017). http://www.taxes.gov.az
  15. 15.
    Musayev, A.F., Kalbiyev, Y.A., Huseynov, A.A.: The tax system of Azerbaijan Republic: reforms and results, Baku (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roszkowska, E.: Rank ordering criteria weighting methods – a comparative overview. Optimum. Studio Ekonomicze 5(65), 14–33 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Musayeva
    • 1
  • T. M. Musayev
    • 2
  • M. Kh. Gazanfarli
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.The Azerbaijan UniversityBakuAzerbaijan
  2. 2.ANAS Institute of Control SystemsBakuAzerbaijan
  3. 3.ANAS Institute of EconomyBakuAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations