An Integrated Fuzzy Decision Framework for Neuromarketing Technology Selection Problem

  • Mehtap DursunEmail author
  • Nazli Goker
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 896)


Companies that want to increase profitability try to have a deeper understanding of consumers’ complex purchasing habits. This complexity has forced academics and companies to seek ways beyond traditional marketing research methods. Neuroscience, together with developing medical technologies, reveals new, evolving and synthesized findings about the functioning of the human brain. This finding, which emerges with technological developments, helps consumers to investigate how consumers react consciously and subconsciously to brands, advertisements and products. Neuromarketing can offer complementary alternatives to researchers in areas that traditional marketing methods cannot account for. This study introduces a 2-tuple linguistic representation modeling based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) framework to determine the best performing neuromarketing technology. The proposed decision framework identifies the most suitable neuromarketing technology while enabling experts to cope with the information loss problem.


Neuromarketing technology selection Linguistic hierarchies 2-Tuple linguistic representation MCDM 



This work is supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund Project 18.402.007.


  1. 1.
    Gordon, W.: The darkroom of the mind: what does neuropsychology now tell us about brands? J. Consum. Behav. 1, 280–292 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ariely, D., Berns, G.S.: Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 284–292 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hubert, M., Kenning, P.: A current overview of consumer neuroscience. J. Consum. Behav. 7(4–5), 272–292 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher, C.E., Chin, L., Klitzman, R.: Defining neuromarketing: Practices and professional challenges. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry 18, 230–237 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruanguttamanun, C.: Neuromarketing: i put myself into a fMRI scanner and realized that I love Louis Vuitton ads. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 148, 211–218 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burgos-Campero, A.A., Vargas-Hernandez, J.G.: Analitical approach to neuromarketing as a business strategy. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 99, 517–525 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8(6), 746–752 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordon, O., Herrera, F., Zwir, I.: Linguistic modeling by hierarchical systems of linguistic rules. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 10(1), 2–20 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herrera, F., Martínez, L.: An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on 2-tuple fuzzy representation model in decision-making. Int. J. Uncertain., Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst. 8(5), 539–562 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Martínez, L., Herrera, J.C., López, A.G.: Incorporating filtering techniques in a fuzzy linguistic multi-agent model for information gathering on the web. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 148(1), 61–83 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huynh, V.N., Nakamori, Y.: A satisfactory-oriented approach to multiexpert decision-making with linguistic assessments. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B-Cybern. 35(2), 184–196 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentGalatasaray UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations