Advertisement

Fuzzy Logic Based Modelling of Decision Buying Process

  • Gunay Sadikoglu
  • Tulen Saner
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 896)

Abstract

Understanding of buyer behaviour plays a significant role in marketing. Modelling of buyer behaviour provides an ability to segment the market effectively and develop marketing-mix usefully. Existing models of buyer decision-making are not well suited to uncertain, imprecise real-life situation and there is a need to develop a new conceptual and quantitative model.

In this paper, we suggest fuzzy logic based on 2-level hierarchical decision-making model which includes main factors affecting consumer buying behaviour such as environmental, situational, psychological, social and other that are inherently uncertain and imprecise.

In the first level of the model impact of shopping environment and time pressure on psychological variables such as shopping motivation and emotion of consumers are considered. In the second level, the relationship between shopping motivation and emotion of consumers’ buying intensity is established. Decision processes are performed by using fuzzy aggregation methods and fuzzy reasoning on the bases of obtained fuzzy “If-Then” rules.

Finally, the numerical example is provided in order to demonstrate the validity of the proposed model.

Keywords

Decision-making Hierarchical model Emotion Shopping motivation Consumer buying intensity Horizontal membership function 

References

  1. 1.
    Engel, F.J.: Consumer Behaviour. Delmar Cengage Learning, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadikoglu, G.: Modelling of Consumer Buying Behaviour Using Z-Number Concept Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2017.1327159MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sadikoglu, G.: Modeling of the travelers’ shopping motivation and their buying behaviour using fuzzy logic. Procedia Comput. Sci. 120, 805–811 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarah, M. S.: Motivation and emotion are usually viewed as two psychological features that seemingly share cause-and-effect relationship. https://explorable.com/motivation-and-emotion. Accessed 23 Oct 2017
  5. 5.
    Infantolino, Z.P., Miller, G.A., Crocker, L.D., Heller, W., Waren, S.L., O’Hare, A.J.: Relationships among cognition, emotion, and motivation: implications for Intervention and neuroplasticity in psychopathology. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 261 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tomaszewski, K.: The application of horizontal membership functions to fuzzy arithmetic operations. J. Theor. Appl. Comput. Sci. 8(2), 3–10 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yi-Hsin, L., Ching-Fu, Ch.: Passengers’ shopping motivations and commercial activities at airports - The moderating effects of time pressure and impulse buying tendency. Tour. Manag. 36, 426–434 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, S.: Development of a hybrid intelligent system for developing marketing strategy. Decis. Support Syst. 27, 395–409 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Casillas, J., Martínez-López, F.J.: Mining uncertain data with multiobjective genetic fuzzy systems to be applied in consumer behaviour modelling. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2, part 1), 1645–1659 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enache, I.C.: Marketing a web-site using a fuzzy logic approach Marketing. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on RISK MANAGEMENT, ASSESSMENT and MITIGATION (2010). www.wseas.us/e-library/conferences/2010/Bucharest/RIMA/RIMA-59.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2017
  11. 11.
    Martínez-López, F.J., Casillas, J.: Artificial intelligence-based systems applied in industrial marketing: an historical overview, current and future insights. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42, 489–495 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sadikoglu, F., Huseynov, O., Memmedova, K.: Z-regression analysis in psychlogical and educational researches. Procedia Comput. Sci. 102, 385–389 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moreno, J.: Trading strategies modelling in Colombian power market using artificial intelligence techniques. Energy Policy 37, 836–843 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neshat, M., Baghi, A., Pourahmad, A., Sepidnam, G., Sargolzaei, M., Masoumi, A.: FHESMM: fuzzy hybrid expert system for marketing mix. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues (IJCSI) 8, 126(2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aliev, R.A.: Uncertain computation based on decision theory. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Fuzzy Set and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pedrycz, W.: Fuzzy Control and Fuzzy Systems, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Donovan, R.J., Rossiter, J.R.: Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach. J. Retail. 58(1), 34–57 (1982)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bohl, J.: The impact of airport shopping environments and dwell time on consumer spending, VEZETÉSTUDOMÁNY, XLV. ÉVF. 2014. 11. SZÁM (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piegat, A., Plucinski, M.: Computing with words with the use of inverse RDM models of membership functions. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 25(3), 675–688 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mendel, J.M., Wu, D.: Computing with words for hierarchical decision making applied to evaluating a weapon. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 18, 441–460 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationNear East UniversityNicosia, Mersin 10Turkey
  2. 2.School of Tourism and Hotel ManagementNear East UniversityNicosia, Mersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations