Advertisement

Development of the 500 Biggest Family Enterprises Since Foundation

  • Laura K. C. Seibold
  • Maximilian Lantelme
  • Hermut Kormann
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the influence of firm age on the growth rates of family businesses. Based on a sample of the 500 biggest German family businesses the long-term development of each company is simulated and compound annual growth rates (CAGR) are calculated to compare the performance since the firms’ foundations. This long-term analysis indicates that family businesses can achieve growth rates independent of their age but they have to consider the impact of an aging company on the size and on other internal factors to make growth possible and secure the existence of the company over generations. Even small growth differences over years can change the company’s development tremendously with age.

Keywords

Family business Development Growth Foundation Downfall 

References

  1. Caves, R. E. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(4), 1947–1982.Google Scholar
  2. Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Die Deutsche Wirtschaft. (2016). Die 1000 größten Familienunternehmen Deutschlands [The 1000 largest family businesses in Germany].Google Scholar
  4. Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fischer, S. (1993). The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 458–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gähde, U. (2000). Gedankenexperimente in Erkenntnistheorie und Physik: strukturelle Parallelen [Thought experiments in epistemology and physics: Structural parallels]. In J. Nida-Rümelin (Ed.), Rationalität, Realismus, Revision. Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München (Rationality, realism, revision) (pp. 457–464). Berlin: de Gruyter (Perspektiven der analytischen Philosophie, 23).Google Scholar
  7. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités économiques: applications: aux inégalités des richesses, à la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc. d’une loi nouvelle: la loi de l’effet proportionnel [Economic inequalities: Applications: To wealth inequalities, corporate concentration, urban populations, family statistics, etc. of a new law: The law of proportional effect]. Paris: Librairie du recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  8. Haberlandt, K. (1970). Das Wachstum der industriellen Unternehmung [Growth of the industrial enterprise]. Dissertation, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.Google Scholar
  9. Howell, N. (2000). Demography of the Dobe !Kung (2nd ed.). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Kieser, A., & Woywode, M. (2006). Evolutionstheoretische Ansätze [Evolution theoretical approaches]. In A. Kieser & M. Ebers (Eds.), Organisationstheorien [Organizational theories] (6th ed., pp. 309–352). Stuttgart: KohlhammerGoogle Scholar
  11. Klingaman, W. K. (c1989 [1990]). 1929. The year of the great crash. New York: Perennial Library.Google Scholar
  12. Kolb, E. (2002). Die Weimarer Republik [The Weimar Republic]. (6th ed.). Munich: Oldenbourg (Oldenbourg-Grundriss der Geschichte, 16)Google Scholar
  13. Maddison, A. (2007). Contours of the world economy, 1-2030 AD. Essays in macro-economic history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. May, P. (2012). Erfolgsmodell Familienunternehmen. Das Strategie-Buch [Family business success model. The strategy book]. Hamburg: Murmann Verlag GmbHGoogle Scholar
  15. McGuire, J. W. (1963). Factors affecting the growth of manufacturing firms. Edited by Bureau of Business Research University of Washington. Washington (Small Business Management Research Reports).Google Scholar
  16. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nida-Rümelin, J. (Ed.) (2000). Rationalität, Realismus, Revision. Vorträge des 3. internationalen Kongresses der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie vom 15. bis zum 18. September 1997 in München = Rationality, realism, revision. Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie; International Conference Rationality, Realism, Revision; Internationaler Kongreß der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie; Internationaler Kongress “Rationalität, Realismus, Revision” [Rationality, Realism, Revision. Lectures of the 3rd International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy from September 15 to 18, 1997 in Munich = Rationality, realism, revision. Society for Analytical Philosophy; International Conference Rationality, Realism, Revision; International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy; International Congress “Rationality, Realism, Revision”]. Berlin: de Gruyter (Perspektiven der analytischen Philosophie, 23).Google Scholar
  18. Ørsted, H. C., Jelved, K., Jackson, A. D., & Knudsen, O. (1998). Selected scientific works of Hans Christian Orsted. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  20. Pflaumer, P., Heine, B., & Hartung, J. (2009). Deskriptive Statistik [Descriptive statistics] (4th ed.). Munich Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbHGoogle Scholar
  21. Rall, W. (2002). Internes vs. externes Wachstum [Internal vs. external growth]. In M. Glaum, U. Hommel, & D. Thomaschewski (Eds.), Wachstumsstrategien internationaler Unternehmungen. Internes vs. externes Unternehmenswachstum [Growth strategies of international companies. Internal vs. external company growth] (pp. 4–19). Stuttgart: Schäffer-PoeschelGoogle Scholar
  22. Rudin, H. R. (1967). Armistice 1918. Hamden: Archon Books.Google Scholar
  23. Rudolph, T. (2009). Modernes Handelsmanagement. Eine Einführung in die Handelslehre [Modern trade management. An introduction to the theory of retailing] (2nd ed.). Stuttgart: Schäffer-PoeschelGoogle Scholar
  24. Santarelli, E., Klomp, L., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Gibrat’s law: An overview of the empirical literature. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and innovation (Vol. 12, pp. 41–73). New York, NY: Springer (International Studies in Entrepreneurship).Google Scholar
  25. Scharpf, P. (2009). Handbuch Bankbilanz. Düsseldorf: IDW-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Sorensen, R. A. (1998). Thought experiments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stiftung Familienunternehmen. (2011). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen [The economic importance of family enterprises]. Munich: Stiftung FamilienunternehmenGoogle Scholar
  28. Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 40–59.Google Scholar
  29. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waner, S., & Costenoble, S. R. (1996). Calculus applied to the real world. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  31. Wehler, H.-U. (2008). Deutsche Gesellschaftsgeschichte (German social history). 1700–1990 (Vol. 5, 1st ed.). Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  32. Weiss, K. M., & Wobst, H. M. (1973). Demographic models for anthropology. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, 27, i.Google Scholar
  33. Yasuda, T. (2005). Firm growth, size, age and behavior in Japanese manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 24(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura K. C. Seibold
    • 1
  • Maximilian Lantelme
    • 2
  • Hermut Kormann
    • 1
  1. 1.Zeppelin UniversityFriedrichshafenGermany
  2. 2.Accenture StrategyMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations