Advertisement

Hotspots and Blind Spots

A Case of Predictive Policing in Practice
  • Lauren WaardenburgEmail author
  • Anastasia Sergeeva
  • Marleen Huysman
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 543)

Abstract

This paper reports on an ethnographic study of the use of analytics in police work. We find that the introduction of predictive policing was followed by the emergence of the new occupational role of “intelligence officer”. While intelligence officers were initially intended to merely support police officers by making sense of algorithmic outputs, they became increasingly influential in steering police action based on their judgments. Paradoxically, despite the largely subjective nature of intelligence officers’ recommendations, police officers started to increasingly believe in the superiority and objectivity of algorithmic decision-making. Our work contributes to the literature on occupational change and technology by highlighting how analytics can occasion the emergence of intermediary occupational roles. We argue that amidst critical debates on subjectivity of analytics, more attention should be paid to intermediaries – those who are in-between designers and users – who may exert the most consequential influence on analytics outcomes by further black-boxing the inherent inclusion of human expertise in analytics.

Keywords

Analytics Algorithms Predictive policing Occupational change Future of work Data-driven work 

References

  1. 1.
    Ambrose, M.L.: Lessons from the avalanche of numbers: big data in historical perspective. I/S: J. Law Policy Inf. Soc. 11(2), 201–277 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anteby, M., Chan, C.K., DiBenigno, J.: Three lessons on occupations and professions in organizations: becoming, doing, and relating. Acad. Manag. Ann. 10(1), 183–244 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bailey, D.E., Leonardi, P.M., Barley, S.R.: The lure of the virtual. Organ. Sci. 22(1), 262–285 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barley, S.R.: Why the internet makes buying a car less loathsome: how technologies change role relations. Acad. Manag. Discov. 1(1), 5–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barley, S.R.: Technology as an occasion for structuring evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Adm. Sci. Q. 31(1), 78–108 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barocas, S., Selbst, A.D.: Big data’s disparate impact. Calif. Law Rev. 104, 671–732 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrett, M., Oborn, E., Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J.: Reconfiguring boundary relations: robotic innovations in pharmacy work. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1448–1466 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bechky, B.A.: Object lessons: workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction. Am. J. Sociol. 109(3), 720–752 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Critical questions for big data. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15(5), 662–670 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braverman, H.: Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Monthly Review Press, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crawford, K., Schultz, J.: Big data and due process: toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston Coll. Law Rev. 55, 93–128 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G., Morison, R.: Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions, Better Results. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dourish, P.: Algorithms and their others: algorithmic culture in context. Big Data Soc. 3(2), 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elish, M.C., Boyd, D.: Situating methods in the magic of big data and AI. Commun. Monogr. 85(1), 57–80 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., Sayegh, K.: Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Inf. Organ. 28(1), 62–70 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forsythe, D.E.: Engineering knowledge: the construction of knowledge in artificial intelligence. Soc. Stud. Sci. 23, 445–477 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gitelman, L.: Raw Data is an Oxymoron. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer-Schonberger, V., Cukier, K.: Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. John Murray, London (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E.: Big data: the management revolution. Harvard Bus. Rev. 90(10), 60–68 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nelson, A.J., Irwin, J.: Defining what we do – all over again: occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/internet-search relationship. Acad. Manag. J. 57(3), 892–928 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Newell, S., Marabelli, M.: Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: a call for action on the long-term societal effects of “Datification”. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 3–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Neil, C.: Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown, New York (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: Digital work: a research agenda. In: Czarniawska, B.E. (ed.) A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Scott, S.V.: What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organ. Sci. 25(3), 868–891 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pachidi, S., Huysman, M.H.: Organizational intelligence in the digital age: analytics and the cycle of choice. In: Galliers, R.D., Stein, M.K. (eds.) Routledge Companions in Business, Management, and Accounting. Routledge, London, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pachidi, S., Berends, H., Faraj, S., Huysman, M.H., van de Weerd, I.: What happens when analytics lands in the organization? Studying epistemologies in clash. Acad. Manag. Proc. 4(1), 15590 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perry, W.L., McInnis, C.C., Price, S., Smith, S., Hollywood, J.S.: Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. RAND Corporation (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pine, K.H., Liboiron, M.: The politics of measurement and action. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3147–3156. ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ribes, D., Jackson, S.J.: Data bite man: the work of sustaining a long-term study. In: Gitelman, L. (ed.) Raw Data is an Oxymoron, pp. 147–166. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schultze, U.: A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Q. 24(1), 3–41 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zarsky, T.: The trouble with algorithmic decisions: an analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Sci. Technol. Human Values 41(1), 118–132 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zuboff, S.: In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books, New York (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauren Waardenburg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anastasia Sergeeva
    • 1
  • Marleen Huysman
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations