Advertisement

Re-figuring Gilbert the Drone

  • Mads Bødker
  • Stefan Olavi Olofsson
  • Torkil Clemmensen
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 543)

Abstract

In the paper we offer a story of re-figuring a consumer drone as a way of “living with monsters”. If drones are “monstrous”, what potentials might lie in re-framing them as more benign, civic, or even perhaps enchanted? Based on a field study of work at a makerspace, we present re-figuring as a process of reflecting, interacting and imagining the function of a drone, using gradually developing intuitions as well as an emergent felt ‘sense’ of the drone in practice. Using an analytic trajectory broadly based on philosophies of affect, we suggest how felt relations to technology can potentially become further involved in a critical move towards re-figuring “monstrous” technologies.

Keywords

Drones Re-figuring Design 

References

  1. 1.
    Shepardson, D.: U.S. commercial drone use to expand tenfold by 2021: government agency. Reuters (2016). https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-drones/u-s-commercial-drone-use-to-expand-tenfold-by-2021-government-agency-idUSKBN16S2NM. Accessed 14 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Manjikian, M.: Becoming unmanned. Int. Feminist. J. Polit. 16(1), 48–65 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haggerty, K.D., Ericson, R.V.: The surveillant assemblage. Br. J. Sociol. 51(4), 605–622 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrejevic, M.: Theorizing drones and droning theory. In: Završnik, A. (ed.) Drones and Unmanned Aerial Systems, pp. 21–43. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23760-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, V., Chundury, P., Chetty, M.: Spiders in the sky: user perceptions of drones, privacy, and security. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2017), Boulder, Colorado, 6–11 May, pp. 6765–6776. ACM, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025632
  6. 6.
    Clough, P.: The affective turn: political economy, bio-media and bodies. Theory Cult. Soc. 25(1), 1–22 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bennett, J.: The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bennett, J.: Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham. Duke University Press, North Carolina (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Turkle, S. (ed.): Evocative Objects – Things We Think With. MIT University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hodder, I.: Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wetherell, M.: Affect and discourse – What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity 6, 349 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bødker, M., Chamberlain, A.: Affect theory and autoethnography in ordinary information systems. In: Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bødker, M., Jensen, T.B.: Sounding out IS? Moods and affective entanglements in experiential computing. In: Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kidd, A., Smitheram, J.: Designing for affect through affective matter. Interstices, vol. 15 (2014). http://interstices.aut.ac.nz/ijara/index.php/ijara/issue/view/1/showToc
  16. 16.
    Williams, R.: Marxism and Literature. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1977)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Böhme, G.: (Translated by A.-Chr. Engels-Schwarzpaul). The theory of atmospheres and its applications, Interstices, vol. 15 (2014). http://interstices.aut.ac.nz/ijara/index.php/ijara/article/view/201
  18. 18.
    Dunne, A.: Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience and Critical Design. Royal College of Art, London (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dunne, A., Raby, F.: Critical Design FAQ (2007). http://www.dunneandraby.co.uk/content/bydandr/13/0. Accessed 12 May 2018
  20. 20.
    Dunne, A., Raby, F.: Speculative Everything – Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dunne, A., Raby, F.: Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Birkhäuser, Basel (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bardzell, J Bardzell, S.: What is “Critical” about Critical Design? CHI ’13. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3297–3306 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pink, S., Akama, Y., Sumartojo, S.: Uncertainty and Possibility: New Approaches to Future Making in Design Anthropology. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Orr, J.: Images of work. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 23(4), 439–455 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Graeff, E., Matias, J.N.: Making drones civic. Values and design principles for civic technology. In: International Studies Association’s 56th Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Torres, C., O’leary, J., Paulos, E.: LiveObjects: leveraging theatricality for an expressive internet of things. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS 2016 Companion (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2908805.2908807
  27. 27.
    Latour, B.: We Have Never Been Modern (Transl. Catherine Porter). Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mads Bødker
    • 1
  • Stefan Olavi Olofsson
    • 2
  • Torkil Clemmensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark
  2. 2.FrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations