Advertisement

SemVec: Semantic Features Word Vectors Based Deep Learning for Improved Text Classification

  • Feras Odeh
  • Adel Taweel
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11324)

Abstract

Semantic word representation is a core building block in many deep learning systems. Most word representation techniques are based on words angle/distance, word analogies and statistical information. However, popular models ignore word morphology by representing each word with a distinct vector. This limits their ability to represent rare words in languages with large vocabulary. This paper proposes a dynamic model, named SemVec, for representing words as a vector of both domain and semantic features. Based on the problem domain, semantic features can be added or removed to generate an enriched word representation with domain knowledge. The proposed method is evaluated on adverse drug events (ADR) tweets/text classification. Results show that SemVec improves the precision of ADR detection by 15.28% over other state-of-the-art deep learning methods with a comparable recall score.

Keywords

Convolution neural networks Deep learning Text classification Word embeddings Features engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Akhtyamova, L., Alexandrov, M., Cardiff, J.: Adverse drug extraction in twitter data using convolutional neural network. In: 2017 28th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pp. 88–92. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: SentiWordNet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: LREC, vol. 10, pp. 2200–2204 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T.: Enriching word vectors with subword information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04606 (2016)
  4. 4.
    Brown, P.F., Desouza, P.V., Mercer, R.L., Pietra, V.J.D., Lai, J.C.: Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Comput. Linguist. 18(4), 467–479 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dos Santos, C.N., Gatti, M.: Deep convolutional neural networks for sentiment analysis of short texts. In: COLING, pp. 69–78 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 168–177. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huynh, T., He, Y., Willis, A., Rüger, S.: Adverse drug reaction classification with deep neural networks. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 877–887 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, R., Zhang, T.: Semi-supervised convolutional neural networks for text categorization via region embedding. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 919–927 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, R., Zhang, T.: Supervised and semi-supervised text categorization using LSTM for region embeddings. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 526–534 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5882 (2014)
  11. 11.
    Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., Dyer, C.: Neural architectures for named entity recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01360 (2016)
  12. 12.
    Lee, J.Y., Dernoncourt, F.: Sequential short-text classification with recurrent and convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.03827 (2016)
  13. 13.
    Lee, K., et al.: Adverse drug event detection in tweets with semi-supervised convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 705–714. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)
  15. 15.
    Nair, V., Hinton, G.E.: Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2010), pp. 807–814 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Niu, Y., Zhu, X., Li, J., Hirst, G.: Analysis of polarity information in medical text. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2005, p. 570. American Medical Informatics Association (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. EMNLP 14, 1532–1543 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Poria, S., Cambria, E., Gelbukh, A.: Deep convolutional neural network textual features and multiple kernel learning for utterance-level multimodal sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2539–2544 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sahu, S.K., Anand, A., Oruganty, K., Gattu, M.: Relation extraction from clinical texts using domain invariant convolutional neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.09370 (2016)
  20. 20.
    Sarker, A., Aliod, D.M., Paris, C.: Automatic prediction of evidence-based recommendations via sentence-level polarity classification. In: IJCNLP, pp. 712–718 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarker, A., Gonzalez, G.: Portable automatic text classification for adverse drug reaction detection via multi-corpus training. J. Biomed. Inf. 53, 196–207 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, J., Yu, L.C., Lai, K.R., Zhang, X.: Dimensional sentiment analysis using a regional CNN-LSTM model. In: ACL 2016-Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, vol. 2, pp. 225–230 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, P., Xu, B., Xu, J., Tian, G., Liu, C.L., Hao, H.: Semantic expansion using word embedding clustering and convolutional neural network for improving short text classification. Neurocomputing 174, 806–814 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 347–354. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xiao, Y., Cho, K.: Efficient character-level document classification by combining convolution and recurrent layers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.00367 (2016)
  26. 26.
    Zeng, D., Liu, K., Lai, S., Zhou, G., Zhao, J.: Relation classification via convolutional deep neural network. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 2335–2344 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birzeit UniversityBirzeitPalestine

Personalised recommendations