Modelling of Physics Processes

  • Luca Cadamuro
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


An accurate modelling of the signal and background processes is crucial to explore the selected data events. Both simulations performed with the Monte Carlo technique and estimations in signal-free data regions (usually referred to as “data-driven” methods) are adopted to model the processes involved in the Open image in new window search as described in this chapter. Residual discrepancies between the modelling and the observed data, as well as statistical uncertainties affecting the data-driven methods, are taken into account as systematic uncertainties, that are part of the statistical interpretation of the data. A description of their sources and of their effects on the sensitivity of the search is presented.


  1. 1.
    J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations. JHEP 07, 79 (2014). arXiv:1405.0301
  2. 2.
    E. Re, Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1547 (2011). arXiv:1009.2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, P. Nason, E. Re, Top-pair production and decay at NLO matched with parton showers. JHEP 04, 114 (2015). arXiv:1412.1828
  4. 4.
    NNPDF Collaboration, Parton distributions for the LHC Run II. JHEP 04, 040 (2015)., arXiv:1410.8849
  5. 5.
    T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2. Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015)., arXiv:1410.3012ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Agostinelli et al., Geant4–a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250 (2003). Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Allison et al., Geant4 developments and applications. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53, 270 (2006). Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Carvalho, Tools for search for non-resonant GF di-Higgs at LHC (2017),
  9. 9.
    M. Czakon, A. Mitov, NNLO+NNLL top-quark-pair cross sections (2015),
  10. 10.
    M. Czakon, A. Mitov, Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at Hadron Colliders. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2930 (2014). arXiv:1112.5675ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    CMS Collaboration, Investigations of the impact of the parton shower tuning in Pythia 8 in the modelling of \(\rm t\overline{t}\) at \(\sqrt{s}=8\) and 13 TeV, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TOP-16-021, CERN (2016),
  12. 12.
    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of particle level differential ttbar cross sections in the dilepton channel at sqrt(s) = 13 TeV, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TOP-16-007, CERN (2016),
  13. 13.
    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of differential cross sections for top quark pair production using the lepton+jets final state in proton–proton collisions at 13 TeV. Phys. Rev. D 95, 092001 (2017)., arXiv:1610.04191
  14. 14.
    CMS Collaboration, Measurement of the differential cross section for t\(\bar{{\rm t}}\) production in the dilepton final state at \(\sqrt{s}=13~{\rm TeV}\), CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TOP-16-011, CERN (2016),
  15. 15.
    CMS Collaboration, Performance of reconstruction and identification of tau leptons in their decays to hadrons and tau neutrino in LHC Run-2, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-TAU-16-002, CERN (2016),
  16. 16.
    J. Alwall et al., Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C 53, 473 (2008). arXiv:0706.2569ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Li, F. Petriello, Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ. Phys. Rev. D 86, 094034 (2012). arXiv:1208.5967
  18. 18.
    CMS Collaboration, Measurements of differential production cross sections for a Z boson in association with jets in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV. JHEP 04, 022 (2017)., arXiv:1611.03844
  19. 19.
    N. Kidonakis, Top quark production (2014), arXiv:1311.0283
  20. 20.
    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, C. Williams, Vector boson pair production at the LHC. JHEP 07, 018 (2011). arXiv:1105.0020
  21. 21.
    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. Deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector., arXiv:1610.07922
  22. 22.
    CMS Collaboration, CMS luminosity measurements for the 2016 data taking period, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-001, CERN (2017),
  23. 23.
    CMS Collaboration, Determination of jet energy calibration and transverse momentum resolution in CMS. JINST 6, P11002 (2011). arXiv:1107.4277ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011).,, arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2501 (2013)]

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations