Making the Most of Knowledge for Development and Development Studies
The chapter is concerned with the role of knowledge for development and in Development Studies. Development relies on many different sorts of knowledge, known as multiple knowledges. Multiple knowledges relate to ‘knowledges’ from different disciplines, schools of thought or derived from different learning processes, cultures or world-views. Different forms of knowledge have always existed: practical or theoretical, analytical or rhetorical, formal or informal. One way of encompassing this reality has been to view the various approaches within a number of implicit or explicit hierarchies. These hierarchies are counterproductive to producing good quality knowledge. There is a pressing need to develop new discourses, narratives and arguments which articulate a perspective on the transformational role of knowledge for development.
- Blackwell, A., Wilson, L., Boulton, C., & Knell, J. (2010). Creating Value Across Boundaries. London: NESTA. http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/creating_value_across_boundaries.pdf. Accessed 17 March 2017.
- Brandner, A., & Cummings, S. J. R. (2017). Agenda Knowledge for Development: Strengthening the Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals. Vienna: Knowledge for Development Partnership. https://k4dp.org/agenda/. Accessed 12 February 2018.
- Brandner, A., & Oster, N. M. (2015). Community Note: Agenda Knowledge for Development Conference, Fall 2016 in Vienna, Austria. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 11(2), 97–100.Google Scholar
- Brown, V. A. (2008). Leonardo’s Vision: A Guide for Collective Thinking and Action. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
- Bunders, J. F. G., Broerse, J. E. W., Keil, F., Pohl, C., Scholz, R. W., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2010). How Can Transdisciplinary Research Contribute to Knowledge Democracy? In R. J. In’t Veld (Ed.), Knowledge Democracy: Consequences for Science, Politics and Media. Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cabral, A. (1980, original 1970). National Liberation and Culture. In A. Cabral (Ed.), Unity and Struggle. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
- Cummings, S. J. R., & Hoebink, P. (2017). Representation of Academics from Developing Countries as Authors and Editorial Board Members in Scientific Journals: Does This Matter to the Field of Development Studies? The European Journal of Development Research, 29(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0002-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cummings, S. J. R., Regeer, B. J., de Haan, L. J. A., Zweekhorst, M. B. M., & Bunders, J. F. G. (2017). Critical Discourse Analysis of Perspectives on Knowledge and Knowledge Societies Within the Sustainable Development Goals. Development Policy Review (online first, April 2017).Google Scholar
- Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (1999). Evaluating Transdisciplinary Research: Evaluation Criteria for Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. Panorama, 1(29).Google Scholar
- Jha, A. (2012, July 25). UK Government Will Enforce Open Access to Development Research. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/jul/25/uk-government-open-access-development-research. Accessed 6 April 2016.
- KFPE. (2014). A Guide for Transboundary Research Partnerships. Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries (KFPE). https://naturalsciences.ch/uuid/564b67b9-c39d-5184-9a94-e0b129244761. Accessed 6 July 2017.
- Kirimi, S., & Wakwabubi, E. (2009). Learning From, Promoting and Using Participation: The Case of International Development Organizations in Kenya (IKM Working Paper 6). https://drupal.ikmemergent.net/File:IKM-WorkingPaper-6-PAMFORK-final.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2018.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1948). Causeries. Paris: Editions du Seuil (2002). English edition: Merleau-Ponty. (2004). The World of Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, M. (1958/1974). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Powell, M., & Cummings, S. (forthcoming). Challenging Ignorance. Emergent Works. https://drupal.ikmemergent.net/challenging_ignorance.
- Powell, M., Davies, T. & Taylor, K. (2012). CT For or Against Development? An Introduction to the Ongoing Case of Web 3.0’ (IKM Working Paper 16). https://drupal.ikmemergent.net/File:1204-IKM-Working_Paper_16-WEB3-Mar_2012-2.pdf. Accessed 12 February 2018.
- Regeer, B. J., & Bunders, J. F. G. (2009). Knowledge Co-creation: Interaction Between Science and Society. A Transdisciplinary Approach to Complex Societal Issues (B. J. Regeer & J. F. G. Bunders, Trans.). The Hague: RMNO.Google Scholar
- ROAPE Editorial Working Group. (2013). Yes to Egalitarian ‘Open Access’, No to ‘Pay to Publish’: A Roape Position Statement on Open Access. Review of African Political Economy, 40(136), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2013.797757.
- Sen, A. (2006). The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian History, Culture and Identity. London, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Srinivasan, R. & Wallack, J. S. (2009). Local-Global: Reconciling Mismatched Ontologies in Development Information Systems. In 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii, 1899, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2009.810.
- Sumner, A., & Tribe, M. (2009). International Development Studies: Theories and Methods in Research and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
- Valters, C. (2015). Theories of Change: Time for a Radical Approach in Learning for Development (ODI Working Paper). http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publicationsopinion-files/9835.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2016.
- wa Thiong’o, N. (2012). Globalectics: Theory and the Politics of Knowing. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar