Engaged Excellence in Development Studies
The chapter explores the ‘engaged excellence’ approach developed by the Institute of Development Studies. It combines high-quality, conceptually and empirically innovative research, with deep extensive engagement with local and global actors through our practices, partners and students. Four pillars contributing to engaged excellence high-quality research are identified: co-constructing knowledge; mobilising impact-orientated evidence, and building enduring partnerships, emphasising their mutual interdependence. The arguments supporting the concept of engaged excellence are epistemological, pragmatic, and normative. In each section, these arguments are outlined, acknowledging that an approach to research that embraces excellence and engagement means that trade-offs need to be made, and ethical and practical challenges navigated. It is shown that the approach has the potential to create more robust and influential research across Development Studies, and helps ensure its dual commitments to scholarly excellence and societal relevance.
- Bardsley, C., (2017). The Pursuit of Impact Through Evidence: The Value of Social Science for Development, a Funder’s Perspective. In J. Georgolakis, M. Jessani, R. Oronje, B. Ramalingam (Eds.), The Social Realities of Knowledge for Development. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/123456789/12852/Social_Realities_of_Knowledge_for_Development_FullIssue.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#page=186. Accessed 8 August 2017.
- Benequista, N. (2011). Blurring the Boundaries: Citizen Action Across States and Societies. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
- Ely, A., & Marin, A. (2017). Learning About ‘Engaged Excellence’ Across a Transformative Knowledge Network. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.200.
- Gaventa, J., & Bivens, F. (2014). Co-constructing Democratic Knowledge for Social Justice: Lessons from an International Research Collaboration. In J. Shefner, H. F. Dahms, R. E. Jones, & A. Jalata (Eds.), Social Justice and the University: Globalisation, Human Rights and the Future of Democracy (pp. 149–174). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harding, S. G. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Howes, M., & Chambers, R. (2016). Originally (1979) IDS Bulletin 10(2). IDS Bulletin 47(6), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.203.
- Keeley, J., & Scoones, I. (2003). Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: Cases from Africa. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y., Lynham, S., Susan, A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 97–128). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Oosterhoff, P., & Shepherd, K. (2016). Affective Engagement: Teaching Young Kenyans About Safe and Healthy Sex. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.201.
- Santos, B. S., et al. (2008). Introduction: Opening Up the Canon of Knowledge and Recognition of Difference. In B. S. Santos (Ed.), Another Knowledge Is Possible Beyond Northern Epistemologies. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Tandon, R., Singh, W., Clover, D., & Hall, B. (2016). Knowledge Democracy and Excellence in Engagement. IDS Bulletin, 47(6), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.197.
- Visvanathan, S. (2005). Knowledge, Justice and Democracy. In M. Leach, I. Scoones, & B. Wynne (Eds.), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement (pp. 83–95). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar