Advertisement

What a Gender Lens Brings to Development Studies

  • Wendy Harcourt
Chapter
Part of the EADI Global Development Series book series (EADI)

Abstract

The chapter explores the challenges of gender for Development Studies in the new Millennium. It looks at the implications of applying a gender lens to the complex economic, social and cultural processes shaping development processes. The underlying premise of the chapter is that development itself is powerfully gendered. It argues that applying a gender lens to Development Studies helps to reveal important insights into how power and knowledge operate in development practice. It presents some of the latest contributions of gender analysis to Development Studies in a discussion of gender and diversity; body politics; post development, feminist political ecology and sustainable development.

References

  1. Agostino, A. (2015). Climate Justice and Women’s Agency: Voicing Other Ways of Doing Things. In R. Baksh & W. Harcourt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Transnational Feminist Movements (pp. 815–836). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alverez, S., de Lima Costa, C., Feliu, V., Hester, R. J., Klahn, N., & Thayer, M. (Eds.). (2014). Translocalities/Translocalidades: Feminist Politics of Translation in the Latin/A Américas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Antrobus, P. (2004). The Global Women’s Movement: Origins, Issues, Strategies. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Baksh, R., & Harcourt, W. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook on Transnational Feminist Movements. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  6. Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the Power Out of Empowerment—An Experiential Account. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 557–565.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron, S. (2006). Fragments of Development: Nation, Gender, and the Space of Modernity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Biekart, K., & Fowler, A. (2012). Transforming Activisms 2010 + Exploring Ways and Waves. Development and Change Forum 2013, 44(3), 527–546. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi.org/10.1111/dech.12032/pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Carty, L. E., & Mohanty, C. T. (2015). Mapping Transnational Feminist Engagements: Neoliberalism and the Politics of Solidarity. In R. Baksh & W. Harcourt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Transnational Feminist Movements (pp. 82–115). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chakrapani, V. (2010). Hijras/Transgender Women in India: HIV, Human Rights and Social Exclusion. New Delhi: UNDP India. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/hijras_transgender_in_india_hiv_human_rights_and_social_exclusion.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2018.
  12. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Connell, R. W. (2009). Gender in World Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, R. (2012). Transsexual Women and Feminist Thought: Toward New Understanding and New Politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 37(4), 857–881. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/664478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connell, R. (2014). Rethinking Gender from the South. Feminist Studies, 40(3), 518–539. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.15767/feministstudies.40.3.518.
  18. Connell, R., & Pearse, R. (2015). Gender: In World Perspective. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cornwall, A. (2009). Revisiting the Gender Agenda. IDS Bulletin, 38(2), 69–78. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2007.tb00353.x/full.
  20. Cornwall, A., & Eade, D. (2010). Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords. Bourton: Practical Action.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cornwall, A., & Edwards, J. (2014). Feminisms, Empowerment and Development: Changing Women’s Lives. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  22. Cornwall, A., Harrison, E., & Whitehead, A. (Eds.). (2006). Feminisms in Development: Contradictions, Contestations and Challenges. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  23. Cornwall, A., Jolly, S., & Correa, S. (2008). Development with a Body: Sexuality, Human Rights and Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  24. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crenshaw, K. (1994). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. In M. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The Public Nature of Private Violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. De Jong, S. (2016). Mainstream(ing) Has Never Run Clean, Perhaps Never Can: Gender in the Main/Stream of Development. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), Palgrave Handbook on Gender and Development. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364, http://fty.sagepub.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Escobar, A. (1995 [2011]). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Escobar, A. (2007a). Post-development as Concept and Social Practice. In A. Ziai (Ed.), Exploring Post-development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspectives (pp. 18–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Escobar, A. (2007b). Towards Post-development: Searching for Signposts, a New Language and New Paradigms. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The Post Development Reader (pp. 377–403). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  31. Ferguson, L. (2015). “This Is Our Gender Person”. The Messy Business of Working as a Gender Expert in International Development. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17(3), 380–397. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14616742.2014.918787.
  32. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The End of Capitalism as We Knew It: A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A Post-capitalist Politics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  34. Grosz, L. (1994). Volatile Bodies: Towards Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hankivsky, O., et al. (2014). An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework: Critical Reflections on a Methodology for Advancing Equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13(119), 1–16. https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12939-014-0119-x.
  36. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00463663%28198823%2914%3A3%3C575%3ASKTSQI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harcourt, W. (2009). Body Politics in Development: Critical Debates in Gender and Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  38. Harcourt, W. (2014). The Future of Capitalism: A Consideration of Alternatives. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(6), 1307–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harcourt, W. (2016a). Introduction: Dilemmas, Dialogues, Debates. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook on Gender and Development: Critical Engagements in Feminist Theory and Practice (pp. 1–12). London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Harcourt, W. (2016b). Gender Dilemmas in International DS. European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 1–8 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2016.6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harcourt, W. (2016c). Introduction. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 62–76). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  42. Harcourt, W. (2017). Another Hotel Room, Another City, Another Training: Reflections on Co-optation of Feminism by Development. International Journal of Feminist Politics, 19(2), 249–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2017.1291224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harcourt, W., & Nelson, I. L. (Eds.). (2015). Practicing Feminist Political Ecology: Moving Beyond the Green Economy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  44. Harcourt, W., Icaza Garza, R. A., & Vargas, V. (2016). Exploring Embodiment and Intersectionality in Transnational Feminist Activist Research. In K. Biekart, W. Harcourt, & P. Knorringa (Eds.), Exploring Civic Innovation for Social and Economic Transformation (148–167). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Live. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Horn, J. (2013, September 30). Rethinking Social Movements. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/jessica-horn/rethinking-social-movements. Accessed 18 February 2018.
  48. Icaza, R., & Vázquez, R. (2015). The Coloniality of Gender as a Radical Critique of Developmentalism. In W. Harcourt (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Development (pp. 62–76). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  49. Jackson, C., & Pearson, R. (Eds.). (1998). Feminist Visions of Development: Gender Analysis and Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Jolly, S., Cornwall, A., & Hawkins, K. (Eds.). (2013). Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed Realities: Gender Hierarchies in Development Thought. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  52. Kabeer, N. (1997). Women, Wages and Intra-Household Power Relations in Urban Bangladesh. Development and Change, 28(2), 261–302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kabeer, N. (2001). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. In A. Sisak (Ed.), Discussing Women’s Empowerment: Theory and Practice (pp 17–57). Stockholm: Sida Studies. http://dmeforpeace.org/sites/default/files/SidaStudies_No3.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2018.
  54. Kabeer, N., & Mahmud, S. (2004). Rags, Riches and Women Workers: Export-Oriented Garment Manufacturing in Bangladesh. In Commonwealth Secretariat (Ed.), Chains of Fortune: Linking Women Producers and Workers with Global Markets (pp. 133–162). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
  55. Love, B. (2010). Mountain Vegetables and the Politics of Local Flavour. In S. Assmann & E. C. Rath (Eds.), Japanese Foodways, Past and Present (pp. 221–240). Urbana, Chicago, and Springfield: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lind, A. (Ed.). (2010). Development, Sexual Rights and Global Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Luft, R. (2009). Intersectionality and the Risk of Flattening Difference. In M. T. Berger & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The Intersectional Approach: Transforming the Academy Through Race, Class and Gender (pp. 100–117). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  58. McKinnon, K. (2011). Development Professionals in Northern Thailand: Hopes, Politics and Practice. Singapore: Singapore National University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Mendoza, B. (2016). Coloniality of Gender and Power: From Postcoloniality to Decoloniality. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory (pp 100–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mohanty, C. (2003). Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nash, J. (2008). Rethinking Intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Parpart, J., Rai, S., & Staudt, K. (Eds.). (2002). Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Paulson, S. (2016). Masculinities and Femininities in Latin America’s Uneven Development. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Petchesky, R. (2002). Global Prescriptions: Gender Health and Human Rights. London: Zed Books in association with UNRISD.Google Scholar
  65. Rai, S. (2008). The Gender Politics of Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  66. Resurrección, B. P. (2017). Gender and Environment from ‘Women, Environment and Development’ to Feminist Political Ecology. In S. MacGregor (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Environment (pp. 71–85). Oxford and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Richardson, D., & Robinson, V. (Eds.). (2008). Introducing Gender and Women’s Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Rocheleau, D. (2015). A Situated View of Feminist Political Ecology from My Networks, Roots and Territories. In W. Harcourt & I. L. Nelson (Eds.), Practicing Feminist Political Ecology: Moving Beyond the Green Economy (pp. 29–66). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  69. Rocheleau, D., & Nirmal, P. (2015). Feminist Political Ecologies: Grounded, Networked and Rooted on Earth. In R. Baksh & W. Harcourt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Transnational Feminist Movements (pp. 793–814). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Sachs, W. (1992 [2010]). The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  71. Sandler, J. (2015). “Warriors Within”: How Feminists Change Bureaucracies and Bureaucracies Change Feminists. In R. Baksh & W. Harcourt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements (pp. 188–214). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Sharma, J. (2009). Reflections on the Construction of Heteronormativity. Development, 52(1), 52–5.  https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2008.72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Spivak, G. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. UN Women. (2015, December 13). The World’s Women: Trends and Statistics. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/gender/worldswomen.html. Accessed 13 December 2015.
  75. Valters, C. (2015). Theories of Change: Time for a Radical Approach in Learning for Development (ODI Working Paper). London: ODI. http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9835.pdf. Accessed 17 December 2015.
  76. Visvanathan, N., Duggan, L., Nisonoff, L., Wiegersma, N., (Eds.). (1997 [2010]). Women Gender and Development Reader. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  77. Walby, S. (2009). Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  78. Wilson, K. (2012). Race, Racism and Development: Interrogating History, Discourse and Practice. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  79. Woodward, A. E. (2012). Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance. In W. L. Chew & B. Mosslemans (Eds.), Vesalius College 25 Years of Academic Excellence in Teaching and Research (pp. 145–170). Brussels: Academic & Scientific Publishers.VUB-Press.Google Scholar
  80. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350506806065752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ziai, A. (Ed.). (2007). Exploring Post-development: Theory and Practice, Problems and Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy Harcourt
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus UniversityThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations