Introduction: Reflecting on Development Studies in the New Millennium

  • Elisabetta BasileEmail author
  • Isa Baud
Part of the EADI Global Development Series book series (EADI)


This chapter provides an overview of debates on Development Studies taking place within EADI in the new Millennium. After introducing the main changes in global development processes forming the context of Development Studies, the chapter explores the contributions to the field by Spanish-language and Francophone Development Studies, and the new and potential links Development Studies has to other disciplines, which can help it deal with current challenges in global development issues. In following sections, it explores the implications of these changes for the DS academic community in terms of new perspectives on knowledge, narratives and paradigms, methodologies and scientific impact of research. In the final section, contributions on how Southern issues and perspectives are informing current Northern-dominated academic discussions, and new themes in DS are presented.


  1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2007/2008). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement (OPHI Working Paper 7). University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, J. A. (2012). From Aid to Global Development Policy (Working Paper No. 121, ST/ESA/2012/DWP/121). UN-Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  3. Arndt, C., Jones, S., & Tarp, F. (2015). Assessing Foreign Aid’s Long-Run Contribution to Growth and Development. World Development, 69, 6–18. Scholar
  4. Basile, E. (2013). Capitalist Development in India’s Informal Economy. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baud, I. S. A., Pfeffer, K., & Scott, D. (2016). Configuring Knowledge in Urban Water-Related Risks and Vulnerability. Habitat International, 54(Part 2), 95–99. Scholar
  6. Bourguignon, F., & Morrisson, C. (2002). Inequality Among World Citizens: 1820–1992. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 727–744. Scholar
  7. Browne, S. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals and UN Goal-Setting. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browne, S., & Weiss, T. G. (2014). Conclusion: Making Change Happen? In S. Browne & T. G. Weiss (Eds.), Post-2015 UN Development: Making Change Happen? Abington and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castles, S. (2010). Understanding Global Migration: A Social Transformation Perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1565–1586. Scholar
  10. Cheru, F., & Obi, C. (Eds.). (2010). The Rise of China and India in Africa: Challenges, Opportunities and Critical Interventions. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, R. W., & Sinclair, T. J. (1996). Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264. Scholar
  13. EADI. (2005, September 21–23). Development Studies, Accreditation and EADI. Vision Paper presented at the EADI General Conference, Bonn.Google Scholar
  14. Easterly, W. (2006). The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: The Penguin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ILO. (2012). Decent Work and the Informal Economy. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  16. ILO. (2017). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2017. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  17. International Organization for Migration—The UN Migration Agency. (2017). World Migration Report 2018. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Law, J., & Mol, A. (2002). Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lerche, J. (2007). A Global Alliance Against Forced Labour? Unfree Labour, Neoliberal Globalization and the International Labour Organization. Journal of Agrarian Change, 7(5), 425–452. Scholar
  20. Lelieveld, A., & Knorringa, P. (2018). Frugal Innovation and Development Research. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. Lomborg, B. (2015, August 3/2017, May 31). These Are the Four SDGs We Need to Agree on to Help the Planet. Guardian Sustainable Business, Business and the Sustainable Goals. The Guardian International Edition.Google Scholar
  22. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melber, H. (2015). Knowledge Is Power—And Power Affects Knowledge: Challenges for Research Collaboration in and with Africa. Africa Development, XL(4), 21–42.Google Scholar
  24. Melber, H. (2017, June 22). Development Studies and the SDGs—Mapping an Agenda. Lecture at the CERES Summer School 2017: Engaging with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG): Gaps, Opportunities and Challenges, CERES Research School for International Development, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  25. Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An Introduction. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices (pp. 1–22). Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Moolakkattu, J. S. (2009). Robert W. Cox and Critical Theory of International Relations. International Studies, 46(4), 439–456. Scholar
  27. Moyo, D. (2009). Dead Aid: Why Aid Makes Things Worse and How There Is Another Way for Africa. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. OECD. (2017). Development Co-operation Report 2017: Data for Development. Paris: OECD Publishing. Scholar
  29. OXFAM. (2017). Uprooted by Climate Change: Responding to the Growing Risk of Displacement (Oxfam Briefing Paper).
  30. OXFAM. (2018). Reward Work, Not Wealth: To End the Inequality Crisis, We Must Build an Economy for Ordinary Working People, Not the Rich and Powerful. (Oxfam Briefing Paper 2018).
  31. Pattberg, P., & Zelli, F. (Eds.). (2016). Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and Legitimacy in a Complex World. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Pfeffer, K., & Verrest, H. (2016). Perspectives on the Role of Geo-Technologies for Addressing Contemporary Urban Issues: Implications for IDS. European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 154–166. Scholar
  33. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajan, R. G., & Subramanian, A. (2008). Aid and Growth: What Does the Cross-Country Evidence Really Show? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 643–665. Scholar
  35. Shah, S. H., Hasnat, H., & Rosefield, S. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Indian Soft Power. Strategy, Asia Politics and Policy, 4(2), 268–288. Scholar
  36. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Sumner, A. (2012). Where Do the Poor Live? World Development, 40(5), 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sumner, A. (2016). Why Are Some People Poor? European Journal of Development Research, 28(2), 130–142. Scholar
  39. Sumner, A., & Mallett, R. (2013). Development Cooperation and the New Geography of Global Poverty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  40. UNDESA. (2016). International Migration Report 2015. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  41. UNDP. (2013). Working with Civil Society in Foreign Aid: Possibilities for South–South Cooperation? China: UNDP.Google Scholar
  42. UNDP and ILO. (2007). Asian Experience on Growth, Employment and Poverty. Geneva: UNDP.Google Scholar
  43. UN-IOM. (2018). World Migration Report 2018. Geneva: International Organisation for Migration.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations. (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations