Advertisement

The Quakers and the Joint Stock Company: Uneasy Bedfellows

  • Donncha KavanaghEmail author
  • Martin Brigham
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

The twenty-first century has witnessed a number of corporate scandals and private-sector take-overs that have called into question the shareholder-focused economy. By way of contrast, this chapter focuses on the Quakers as a (largely forgotten) exemplar of good organisation and good governance that has traditionally distinguished itself from the shareholder model. Since their origins in the mid-seventeenth century, the Quakers were known for their honest and honorable business practices, their enlightened approach to employee welfare, their concern for wider society, and their willingness to innovate. Today, most of these ‘Quaker’ businesses are no longer either owned or controlled by Quakers, and have almost invariably adopted the conventional shareholder model of corporate governance. In this chapter, we identify innovations in corporate law in the mid-nineteenth century and especially the introduction of limited liability as important, though largely overlooked, reasons for their demise. These changes provided the legal basis for the Quaker family firms to incorporate, which many of them did in the late nineteenth century. We argue that this change inexorably decanted the unique Quaker ethos out of these companies during the twentieth century as the Quakers slowly lost both ownership and control of their businesses. We then inquire into how the Quaker story might help us reimagine the theory and practice of corporate governance and management.

References

  1. Barley SR, Kunda G (1992) Design and devotion – surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Adm Sci Q 37(3):363–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackstone W (1756) Commentaries on the laws of England. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Carney WJ (1995) Limited liability companies: origins and antecedents Llcs Llps and the evolving corporate form. Univ Colorado Law Rev 66(4):855–880Google Scholar
  4. Chandler AD (1962) Strategy and structure. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandler AD (1977) The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Cobbett W (1830) Rural rides in the counties of Surrey, Kent, Sussex. William Cobbett, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Copley FB (1923) Frederick W. Taylor: father of scientific management. Harper and Brothers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Djelic M-L (2013) When limited liability was (still) an issue: mobilization and politics of signification in 19th-century England. Organ Stud 34(5–6):595–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djelic M-L, Bothello J (2013) Limited liability and its moral hazard implications: the systemic inscription of instability in contemporary capitalism. Theory Soc 42(6):589–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eastman W, Bailey J (1998) Mediating the fact-value antinomy: patterns in managerial and legal rhetoric, 1890–1990. Organ Sci 9(2):232–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finn MC (2007) The character of credit: personal debt in english culture, 1740–1914. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald R (2007) Rowntree and the marketing revolution, 1862–1969. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman M (2013) Quakers, business and philanthropy. In: Angell SW, Dandelion P (eds) The oxford handbook of quaker studies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Furtado P (2013) Quakers. Shire, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Graeber D (2011) Debt: the first 5,000 years. Melville House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Guillén MF (1994) Models of management: work, authority, and organization in a comparative perspective. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansmann H, Kraakman R (2000) The end of history for corporate law essay. Georgetown Law J 89:439–468Google Scholar
  18. Harris R (2013) The private origins of the private company: Britain 1862–1907. Oxf J Leg Stud 33(2):339–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holdsworth WSC (1922) English corporation law in the 16th and 17th centuries. Yale Law J 31(4):382–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyde D, Ellert J, Killing JP (1991) The Nestlé takeover of rowntree: a case study. Eur Manag J 9(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ireland P (1984) The rise of the limited liability company. Int J Soc Law 12(3):239–260Google Scholar
  22. Ireland P (1996) Capitalism without the capitalist: the joint stock company share and the emergence of the modern doctrine of separate corporate personality. J Leg Hist 17(1):41–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ireland P (2010) Limited liability, shareholder rights and the problem of corporate irresponsibility. Camb J Econ 34(5):837–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Isichei E (1970) Victorian quakers. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Jefferys JB (1938) Trends in business organization in Great Britain since 1856, with special reference to the financial structure of companies, the mechanism of investment and the relations between shareholder and company, University of LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahan DR (2009) Shareholder liability for corporate torts: a historical perspective. Georgetown Law J 97:1085–1110Google Scholar
  27. Kempin FG (1960) Limited liability in historical perspective. Am Bus Law Assoc Bull 4(1):11–34Google Scholar
  28. Lamoreaux N (2004) Partnerships, corporations and the limits on contractual freedom in US history: an essay in economics, law, and culture. In: Lipartito K, Sicilia DB (eds) Constructing corporate America: history, politics, culture. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Matthews M, Boyns T, Edwards JR (2003) Chandlerian image or mirror image? managerial and accounting control in the chemical industry: the case of Albright & Wilson, C. 1892 to C. 1923. Bus Hist 45(4):24–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morley B (1993) Beyond consensus: salvaging sense of the meeting. Pendle Hill, Wallingford, PAGoogle Scholar
  31. Muldrew C (1998/2016) The economy of obligation: the culture of credit and social relations in early modern England. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmer FB (1877) Private companies; or how to convert your business into a private company, and the benefit of so doing. Stevens and Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Raistrick A (1950/1968) Quakers in science and industry: being an account of the quaker contributions to science and industry during the 17th and 18th centuries. Kelley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowlinson M, Hassard J (1993) The invention of corporate culture: a history of the histories of Cadbury. Hum Relat 46(3):299–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowntree BS (1901) Poverty, a study of town life. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Saville J (1956) Sleeping partnership and limited liability, 1850–1856. Econ Hist Rev 8(3):418–433Google Scholar
  37. Shenhav Y (1995) From chaos to systems: the engineering foundations of organization theory, 1879–1932. Adm Sci Q 40(4):557–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shenhav Y (1999) Manufacturing rationality: the engineering foundations of the managerial revolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Slaney RA (1850) Select committee on investments for savings of middle and working classes: report, proceedings, minutes of evidence, index. 19th Century House of Commons Sessional PapersGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith A (1776/1981) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Liberty Classics, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith BM (2004) A history of the global stock market: from ancient rome to silicon valley. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith C, Child J, Rowlinson M (1990) Reshaping work: the Cadbury experience. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Society of Friends (1802) Extracts from the minutes and advices of the yearly meeting of friends held in London. Society of Friends, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Society of Friends (1858) Epistles from the yearly meeting of friends, I. Society of Friends, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Southern A (2010) The rowntree history series and the growth of liberal quakerism: 1895–1925. Department of theology and religion. The University of Birmingham, BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor J (2014) Creating capitalism: joint-stock enterprise in British politics and culture, 1800–1870. Boydell & Brewer, WoodbridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Thornton HMP (1802) An enquiry into the nature and effects of the paper credit of Great Britain. J. Hatchard, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Towne HR (1886) The engineer as an economist. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng 7:428–432Google Scholar
  49. Turnbull R (2014) Quaker capitalism. Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  50. Williston SC (1888a) History of the law of business corporations before 1800. I. Harv Law Rev 2(3):105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Williston SC (1888b) History of the law of business corporations before 1800. II. Harv Law Rev 2(4):149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Windsor DB (1980) The quaker enterprise: friends in business. Muller, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Wren DA (ed) (1997) Early management thought. Dartmouth, AldershotGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College DublinDublinRepublic of Ireland
  2. 2.Lancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations