Advertisement

A Case of Lesson Study in South Africa

  • Jill AdlerEmail author
  • Jehad Alshwaikh
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)

Abstract

The Wits Maths Connect Secondary Project, a research-linked professional development project, included Lesson Study with teachers in school clusters. When two teachers shared their experiences of doing Lesson Study, they spoke spontaneously about how much they had learned about choosing and using examples in their teaching. Exemplification is a key element of the mathematics teaching framework developed in the project to support planning and reflection in our Lesson Study work. The teachers’ reflection suggested that working on examples had been enabling and empowering. We zoom in on one Lesson Study cycle with the same teachers to give meaning to what, how and why we work with examples in the way that we do and how our LS practices provide a supportive context for this work. Through this we build a case for a focus on exemplification when studying and working on mathematics teaching and for support at a more general level for theoretically informed Lesson Study.

Keywords

Lesson Study Mathematics Secondary Exemplification South Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is based on the research supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation (Grant No. 71218). Any opinion, finding and conclusion or recommendation expressed in this material is that of the author(s), and the NRF does not accept any liability in this regard.

References

  1. Adler, J. (2017). Mathematics discourse in instruction (MDI): A discursive resource as boundary object across practices. Paper presented at the 13th international congress on mathematical education, ICME-13, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2015). A framework for describing mathematics discourse in instruction and interpreting differences in teaching. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 237–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1089677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2017a). Mathematical discourse in instruction matters. In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: Transforming researchers’ insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 64–81). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (2017b). A lesson to learn from: From research insights to teaching a lesson. In J. Adler & A. Sfard (Eds.), Research for educational change: Transforming researchers’ insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 133–143). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Adler, J., & Ronda, E. (in preparation). What changes in the quality of mathematics in instruction following teachers’ participation in subject matter focused professional development.Google Scholar
  6. Adler, J., & Venkat, H. (2014). Teachers’ mathematical discourse in instruction: Focus on examples and explanations. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring mathematics and science teachers’ knowledge: Windows into teacher thinking (pp. 132–146). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Alshwaikh, J., & Adler, J. (2017a). Researchers and teachers as learners in lesson study. In M. K. Mhlolo, S. N. Matoti, & B. Fredericks (Eds.), SAARMSTE book of long papers (pp. 2–14). Free State: Central University of Technology.Google Scholar
  8. Alshwaikh, J., & Adler, J. (2017b). Tensions and dilemmas as source of coherence. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Mathematics education and life at times of crisis: Proceedings of the ninth international mathematics education and society conference (V2) (pp. 370–381). Volos: University of Thessaly.Google Scholar
  9. Antonini, S., Presmeg, N., Mariotti, M. A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2011). On examples in mathematical thinking and learning. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(2), 191–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0334-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baba, T., & Nakai, K. (2011). Teachers’ institution and participation in a lesson Study Project in Zambia: Implication and Possibilities. Paper presented at the Africa-Asia University Dialogue for Educational Development. Report of the international experience sharing seminar (2). Actual Status and Issues of Teacher Professional Development. Retrieved from http://aadcice.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/e/publications/sosho4_2-06.pdf.
  11. Benson, B., Mudenda, V., Tindi, E., & Nakai, K. (2014). Lesson study practice of science teachers in Zambia: Its effects, enhancing and hindering factors. In Pixel (Ed.), Conference proceedings: New perspectives in science education (pp. 473–477). Florence: libreriauniveritaria.it.Google Scholar
  12. Bills, L., & Watson, A. (2008). Editorial introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 77–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9147-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. da Ponte, J. P. (2017). Lesson studies in initial mathematics teacher education. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(2), 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-08-2016-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dienes, Z. (1960). Building up mathematics. London: Hutchinson Educational Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Dudley, P. (2013). Teacher learning in lesson study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliot, J. (2012). Developing a science of teaching through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 108–125.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251211224163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis, A. B., Ozgur, Z., Vinsonhaler, R., Dogan, M. F., Carolan, T., Lockwood, E., Lynch, A., Sabouri, P., Knuth, E., & Zaslavsky, O. (in press). Student thinking with examples: The criteria-affordances-purposes-strategies framework. Journal of Mathematical Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.06.003.
  18. Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 393–405.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujii, T. (2014). Implementing Japanese lesson study in foreign countries: Misconceptions revealed. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 65–83 Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1046666.Google Scholar
  20. Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: A critical process of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 411–423.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldenberg, P., & Mason, J. (2008). Spreading light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gu, F., & Gu, L. (2016). Characterizing mathematics teaching research specialists’ mentoring in the context of Chinese lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 441–454.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0756-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang, R., & Shimizu, Y. (2016). Improving teaching, developing teachers and teacher educators, and linking theory and practice through lesson study in mathematics: An international perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 393–409.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0795-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, R., Fang, Y., & Chen, X. (2017). Chinese lesson study: A deliberate practice, a research methodology, and an improvement science. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(4), 270–282.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-08-2017-0037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jita, L. C., Maree, J. G., & Ndlalane, T. C. (2008). Lesson study (Jyugyo Kenkyu) from Japan to South Africa: A science and mathematics intervention program for secondary school teachers. In B. Atweh et al. (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 465–486). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Kullberg, A., Runesson, K., & Marton, F. (2017). What is made possible to learn when using the variation theory of learning in teaching mathematics? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 559–569.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0858-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larssen, D. L. S., Cajkler, W., Mosvold, R., Bjuland, R., Helgevold, N., Fauskanger, J., & Norton, J. (2018). A literature review of lesson study in initial teacher education: Perspectives about learning and observation. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 8–22.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2017-0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis, J. M. (2016). Learning to lead, leading to learn: How facilitators learn to lead lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 527–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0753-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.). (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Mason, J. (2001). Tunja sequences as examples of employing students’ powers to generalize. The Mathematics Teacher, 94(3), 164–168.Google Scholar
  31. Murata, A., Bofferding, L., Pothen, B. E., Taylor, M. W., & Wischnia, S. (2012). Making connections among student learning, content, and teaching: Teacher talk paths in elementary mathematics lesson study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(5), 616–650.  https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.5.0616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ntow, F., & Adler, J. (2017). An exploration into teachers’ take up of professional development teaching resources. In B. Kaur, W. K. Ho, T. L. Toh, & B. H. Choy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 313–320). Singapore: PME.Google Scholar
  33. Olteanu, L. (2017). Distributive law as object of learning through direct and inverse tasks. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 56–65.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2016-0014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ono, Y., & Ferreira, J. (2010). A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30(1), 59–74.Google Scholar
  35. Pang, J. (2016). Improving mathematics instruction and supporting teacher learning in Korea through lesson study using five practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 471–483.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0768-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pournara, C., Hodgen, J., Adler, J., & Pillay, V. (2015). Can improving teachers’ knowledge of mathematics lead to gains in learners’ attainment in mathematics? South African Journal of Education, 35(3), 10.  https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n3a1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quaresma, M., Winsløw, C., Clivaz, S., da Ponte, J. P., Ní Shúilleabháin, A., & Takahashi, A. (Eds.). (2018). Mathematics lesson study around the world: Theoretical and methodological issues (ICMI-13 monographs). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Runesson, U. (2006). What is it possible to learn? On variation as a necessary condition for learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600823753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shuilleabhain, A. N. (2016). Developing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in lesson study: Case study findings. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(3), 212–226.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-11-2015-0036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinclair, N., Watson, A., Zazkis, R., & Mason, J. (2011). The structuring of personal example spaces. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(4), 291–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takahashi, A. (2014). The role of the knowledgeable other in lesson study: Examining the final comments of experienced lesson study practitioners. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 4–12.Google Scholar
  42. Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 513–526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0752-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Venkat, H., & Adler, J. (2012). Coherence and connections in teachers’ mathematical discourses in instruction. Pythagoras, 33(3), 25–32.  https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v33i3.188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0802_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wood, K. (2017). Is there really any difference between lesson and learning study? Both focus on neriage. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(2), 118–123.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-02-2017-0008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wood, K. (2018). The many faces of lesson study and learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 7(1), 2–7.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2017-0047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yoshida, M. (2012). Mathematics lesson study in the United States: Current status and ideas for conducting high quality and effective lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 140–152.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251211224181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zaslavsky, O. (in press). There is more to examples than meets the eye: Thinking with and through mathematical examples in different settings. Journal of Mathematical Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.10.001.
  50. Zodik, I., & Zaslavsky, O. (2008). Characteristics of teachers’ choice of examples in and for the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 165–182.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9140-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wits Maths Connect Secondary Project (WMCS), School of EducationUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationBirzeit UniversityBirzeitPalestine
  3. 3.Wits Maths Connect Secondary ProjectUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations