Advertisement

Ludonarrative Hermeneutics: A Way Out and the Narrative Paradox

  • Christian RothEmail author
  • Tom van Nuenen
  • Hartmut Koenitz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)

Abstract

The practice of designing Interactive Digital Narratives [IDN] is often described as a challenge facing issues such as the “narrative paradox” and avoiding the unintentional creation of “ludonarrative dissonance”. These terms are expressions of a perspective that takes narrative and interactivity as dichotomic ends of a design trajectory, mirroring an enduring discussion in game studies between positions often cast as ludologists and narratologists. The dichotomy of ludo versus narrative is, in itself, problematic and is often the source of the very conflict it describes. In this paper, we investigate this issue through the example of the cooperative game A Way Out, in which two players team up to break out of prison. The game is designed with a narrative twist, involving the escalation and final resolution of the game’s competitive motif in the final scene. To understand the user experiences of this reveal, and the concomitant consequences, we engage in a discursive analysis of “Let’s Play” videos as a largely untapped resource for research. By analyzing the interactions and performances in these videos, we can more clearly understand player responses to unsatisfying IDN design. As a result we introduce the notion of a ‘hermeneutic strip’, extending Koenitz’ SPP model to locate and describe the involved processes of narrative cognition in IDN work.

Keywords

Interactive narrative design Ludonarrative dissonance Narrative paradox Hermeneutics Hermeneutic strip SPP model Role distancing 

References

  1. 1.
    Hocking, C.: Ludonarrative Dissonance in Bioshock: The Problem of What Game is About. ETC Press, Pittsburgh (2007). http://clicknothing.typepad.com/click_nothing/2007/10/ludonarrative-d.html
  2. 2.
    Aylett, R.: Emergent narrative, social immersion and “storification”. Presented at the 1st International Workshop on Narrative Interaction for Learning Environments, Edinburgh (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Makedonski, B.: Ludonarrative Dissonance: The Roadblock to Realism (2012). https://www.destructoid.com/ludonarrative-dissonance-the-roadblock-to-realism-235197.phtml
  4. 4.
    Hazelight Studios: A Way Out (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klevjer, R.: What is the avatar? Fiction and embodiment in avatar-based singleplayer computer games (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nitsche, M.: Video Game Spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Genette, G.: Narrative Discourse, An Essay in Method. Cornell UP, Ithaca (1980)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roth, C., Vermeulen, I.: Breaching interactive storytelling’s implicit agreement: a content analysis of fac̨ade user behaviors. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 168–173. Springer, Cham (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lets Play Pals: A Way Out - It Doesn’t Have To Be Like This (End). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nvi3bguqoE
  10. 10.
    Pynenburg, T.: Games worth a thousand words: critical approaches and Ludonarrative Harmony in Interactive narratives. http://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=honors
  11. 11.
    Ryle, G.: The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruner, J.: Life as narrative. Soc. Res. 54, 11–32 (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Starbreeze Studios: Brothers: A Tale of Two Sons (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Solving the narrative paradox in VEs – lessons from RPGs. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 244–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39396-2_41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Narrative theory and emergent interactive narrative. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. Life Learn. 14, 506–518 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: the Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. Free Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Costikyan, G.: Where stories end and games begin (2001). http://www.costik.com/gamnstry.html
  18. 18.
    Jennings, P.: Narrative structures for new media. Leonardo 29, 345–350 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mateas, M.: A preliminary poetics for interactive drama and games. Digit. Creat. 12, 140–152 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koenitz, H.: Towards a theoretical framework for interactive digital narrative. In: Aylett, R., Lim, M.Y., Louchart, S., Petta, P., Riedl, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6432, pp. 176–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koenitz, H.: Narrative in video games. In: Lee, N. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Computer Graphics and Games, pp. 1–9. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08234-9_154-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Montfort, N.: Twisty Little Passages. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koenitz, H.: Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. In: Koenitz, H., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., Sezen, T.I. (eds.) Interactive Digital Narrative, pp. 91–105. Routledge, New York (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Knoller, N.: The expressive space of IDS-as-art. In: Oyarzun, D., Peinado, F., Young, R.M., Elizalde, A., Méndez, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7648, pp. 30–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34851-8_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karhulahti, V.-M.: Double fine adventure and the double hermeneutic videogame. Presented at the Foundations of Digital Games, New York, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dubbelman, T.: Narrative game mechanics. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 39–50. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herman, D.: Story Logic. U of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bordwell, D.: Poetics of Cinema. Routledge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ryan, M.-L.: Narrative Across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Glas, R., de Vos, J., van Vught, J., Zijlstra, H.: Playing the Archive. In: Mol, A.A.A., Ariese-Vandemeulebroucke, C.E., Boom, K.H.J., Politopoulos, A. (eds.) The Interactive Past: Archaeology. Heritage & Video Games. Sidestone Press, Leiden (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wooffitt, R.: Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis. SAGE, London (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liddicoat, A.J.: An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2011)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reeves, S., Greiffenhagen, C., Laurier, E.: Video gaming as practical accomplishment: ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and play. Top. Cogn. Sci. 9, 308–342 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ytreberg, E.: Erving Goffman as a theorist of the mass media. Crit. Stud. Media Commun. 19, 481–497 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press, Boston (1974)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    GameGrumps: A Way Out: Finale - PART 20. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWFMPkU0hKc
  37. 37.
    #TheEscapeBros: Ending - a Way Out [Co-Op] - Part 11. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUfru2Gk92k
  38. 38.
    T&J Nexus: A Way Out, Vincent Ending (Spoilers Duh) Reaction ft Bes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXYLd0J2Lh0
  39. 39.
    Troisi, A.: Interactive Narrative Design in Mass Effect 2. Vancouver, Canada (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Salen, K., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of Play. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goffman, E.: Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Allen Lane, London (1972)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Glas, R.: Vicarious play: engaging the viewer in Let’s Play videos. Empedocles Eur. J. Philos. Commun. 5, 81–86 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Newman, J.: Videogames. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Eakin, P.J.: How Our Lives Become Stories: Making Selves. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1999)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Roth, C., Koenitz, H.: Towards creating a body of evidence-based interactive digital narrative design knowledge: approaches and challenges. Presented at the AltMM 2017, Mountain View, CA 21 August (2017)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Barthes, R.: S/Z. Hill and Wang, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck. The Free Press, New York (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Roth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tom van Nuenen
    • 2
  • Hartmut Koenitz
    • 1
  1. 1.HKU University of the Arts UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations