Advertisement

How Do Writing Tools Shape Interactive Stories?

  • Sofia KitromiliEmail author
  • James Jordan
  • David E. Millard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)

Abstract

Interactive Digital Storytelling is a diverse field, with a variety of different tools and platforms, many of them bespoke. Understanding how these tools effect the stories created using them would allow authors to better select tools for projects, and help developers understand the consequences of their design decisions. We present an initial exploration of this question, using a critical reflection method to analyze the process of adapting a story from StoryPlaces into both Twine and Inform 7. We report four significant differences that posed challenges for adaptation: support for rewinding and/or revisiting, the definition and description of locations, the way in which text is delivered to the reader, and how navigational cues are provided to help readers progress the story. Our observations show that tools impact the stories created using them in ways that are not obvious when working with one platform alone.

Keywords

Interactive storytelling Writing tools Interactive story authoring Hypertext fiction Interactive fiction Location aware narratives 

References

  1. 1.
    Pope, J.: How do readers interact with hypertext fiction? An empirical study of readers’ reactions to interactive narratives. Ph.D., Bournemouth University, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schneider, R.: Hypertext narrative and the reader: a view from cognitive theory. Eur. J. Engl. Stud. 9(2), 197–208 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koenitz, H.: Three questions concerning authoring tools. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling Workshops, Madeira, Portugal, p. 4 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morley, C.: Critical reflection as a research methodology. In: Knowing Differently: Arts-Based and Collaborative Research Methods, pp. 265–280 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Packer, H.S., Hargood, C., Howard, Y., Papadopoulos, P., Millard, D.E.: Developing a writer’s toolkit for interactive locative storytelling. In: Nunes, N., Oakley, I., Nisi, V. (eds.) ICIDS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10690, pp. 63–74. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71027-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hargood, C., Weal, M.J., Millard, D.E.: The StoryPlaces platform: building a web-based locative hypertext system. In: Proceedings of the 29th on Hypertext and Social Media, New York, NY, USA, pp. 128–135 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Twine/An open-source tool for telling interactive, nonlinear stories. http://twinery.org/. Accessed 03 May 2018
  8. 8.
    Inform. http://Inform7.com/. Accessed 03 May 2018
  9. 9.
    Bernstein, M.: Structural patterns and hypertext rhetoric. ACM Comput. Surv. 31(4es), 19 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weal, M.J., Bernstein, M., Millard, D.: On Writing Sculptural Hypertext (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Short, E.: Beyond branching: quality-based, salience-based, and waypoint narrative structures. In: Emily short’s interactive storytelling, 12 April 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall, C.C., Shipman, F.M.: Spatial hypertext: designing for change. Commun. ACM 38(8), 88–97 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atzenbeck, C., Schedel, T., Tzagarakis, M., Roßner, D., Mages, L.: Revisiting hypertext infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, New York, NY, USA, pp. 35–44 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hargood, C., Davies, R., Millard, D., Taylor, M.R., Brooker, S.: Exploring (the poetics of) strange (and fractal) hypertexts. In: 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jenkins, H.: Game design as narrative architecture. Computer 44, 53 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Kitromili
    • 1
    Email author
  • James Jordan
    • 1
  • David E. Millard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations