Advertisement

Cinematic VR as a Reflexive Tool for Critical Empathy

  • Sojung BahngEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11318)

Abstract

This practice-based research aims to develop cinematic VR as a reflexive device for exploring critical empathy. Critical empathy is a concept that emphasizes the limitations and complications of empathy from reflexive perspectives. Many artists and filmmakers have become increasingly interested in using VR as a creative medium for evoking empathy. However, the complexity of the empathic process in reflexive contexts has not been considered sufficiently. Current cinematic VR is focused on creating an immersive illusion to induce a sense of presence or embodied experience rather than eliciting reflection. Although VR technologies have been developing rapidly, there are obvious gaps between physical reality and virtual reality in terms of embodiment and bodily presence. Those gaps do not necessarily need to be erased to create immersive illusions; rather, they can be used effectively as a new method of storytelling and as aesthetic techniques for promoting self and social reflection. The practical exploration of the creation of a new method of immersive storytelling could add substantive insight to understanding cinematic VR, which can be seen as a reflexive device as well as a sociocultural tool for critical empathy.

Keywords

Virtual reality Cinematic VR Critical empathy Immersive storytelling Reflexivity 

References

  1. 1.
    Vosmeer, M., Schouten, B.: Interactive cinema: engagement and interaction. In: Mitchell, A., Fernández-Vara, C., Thue, D. (eds.) ICIDS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8832, pp. 140–147. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12337-0_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    How Virtual Reality Can Create the Ultimate Empathy Machine (2015). https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Kunyk, D., Olson, J.K.: Clarification of conceptualizations of empathy. J. Adv. Nurs. 35(3), 317–325 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leake, E.: The (Un) knowable Self and Others: Critical Empathy and Expressivism. Critical Expressivism: Theory and Practice in the Composition Classroom, pp. 149–160 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DeStigter, T.: Public displays of affection: political community through critical empathy. Res. Teach. Engl. 33(3), 235–244 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryan, M.L.: Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media, vol. 2. JHU Press, Baltimore (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brecht, B.: Brecht on Theatre. Bloomsbury Publishing, London (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slater, M., Wilbur, S.: A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleop. Virtual Environ. 6(6), 603–616 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ryan, M.L.: Immersion vs interactivity virtual reality and literary theory. SubStance 28(2), 110–137 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sensilab, Faculty of Information TechnologyMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations