Advertisement

On the Use of Matrix Based Representation to Deal with Automatic Composer Recognition

  • Izaro Goienetxea
  • Iñigo Mendialdua
  • Basilio Sierra
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11320)

Abstract

In this article the use of a matrix based representation of pieces is tested for the classification of musical pieces of some well known classical composers. The pieces in two corpora have been represented in two ways: matrices of interval pair probabilities and a set of 12 global features which had previously been used in a similar task. The classification accuracies of both representations have been computed using several supervised classification algorithms. A class binarization technique has also been applied to study how the accuracies change with this kind of methods. Promising results have been obtained which show that both the matrix representation and the class binarization techniques are suitable to be used in the automatic composer recognition problem.

Keywords

Matrices Pairwise classification Composer recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the Basque Government Research Teams grant (IT900-16) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. TIN2015-64395-R (MINECO/FEDER).

References

  1. 1.
    Conklin, D.: Multiple viewpoint systems for music classification. J. New Music Res. 42(1), 19–26 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conklin, D., Witten, I.H.: Multiple viewpoint systems for music prediction. J. New Music Res. 24, 51–73 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dor, O., Reich, Y.: An evaluation of musical score characteristics for automatic classification of composers. Comput. Music J. 35(3), 86–97 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fürnkranz, J.: Round robin classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 721–747 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galar, M., Fernández, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recognit. 44(8), 1761–1776 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goienetxea, I., Martínez-Otzeta, J.M., Sierra, B., Mendialdua, I.: Towards the use of similarity distances to music genre classification: a comparative study. PLOS ONE 13(2), 1–18 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goienetxea, I., Neubarth, K., Conklin, D.: Melody classification with pattern covering. In: 9th International Workshop on Music and Machine Learning (MML 2016), Riva del Garda, Italy (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The weka data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herremans, D., Sörensen, K., Martens, D.: Classification and generation of composer-specific music using global feature models and variable neighborhood search. Comput. Music J. 39(3), 71–91 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hillewaere, R., Manderick, B., Conklin, D.: Global feature versus event models for folk song classification. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Kobe, Japan, pp. 729–733 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hillewaere, R., Manderick, B., Conklin, D.: String methods for folk tune genre classification. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, Porto, Portugal (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van Kranenburg, P., Conklin, D.: A pattern mining approach to study a collection of Dutch folk-songs. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Folk Music Analysis (FMA 2016), Dublin, pp. 71–73 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mckay, C., Fujinaga, I.: jsymbolic: a feature extractor for midi files. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 302–305 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sapp, C.S.: Online database of scores in the humdrum file format. In: ISMIR 2005, Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, 11–15 September 2005, London, UK, pp. 664–665 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of the Basque Country UPV/EHUSan SebastianSpain
  2. 2.Department of Computer Languages and SystemsUniversity of the Basque Country UPV/EHUSan SebastianSpain

Personalised recommendations