Advertisement

Cyclist Trajectory Prediction Using Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks

  • Khaled Saleh
  • Mohammed Hossny
  • Saeid Nahavandi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11320)

Abstract

Predicting a long-term horizon of vulnerable road users’ trajectories such as cyclists become an inevitable task for a reliable operation of highly and fully automated vehicles. In the literature, this problem is often tackled using linear dynamics-based approaches based on recursive Bayesian filters. These approaches are usually challenged when it comes to predicting long-term horizon of trajectories (more than 1 sec). Additionally, they also have difficulties in predicting non-linear motions such as maneuvers done by cyclists in traffic environments. In this work, we are proposing two novel models based on deep stacked recurrent neural networks for the task of cyclists trajectories prediction to overcome some of the aforementioned challenges. Our proposed predictive models have achieved robust prediction results when evaluated on a real-life cyclist trajectories dataset collected using vehicle-based sensors in the urban traffic environment. Furthermore, our proposed models have outperformed other traditional approaches with an improvement of more than 50% in mean error score averaged over all the predicted cyclists’ trajectories.

References

  1. 1.
    Alahi, A., Goel, K., Ramanathan, V., Robicquet, A., Fei-fei, L., Savarese, S.: Social LSTM: human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In: CVPR (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clegg, B., Digirolamo, G., Keele, S.: Sequence learning. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2(8), 275–281 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fragkiadaki, K., Levine, S., Felsen, P., Malik, J.: Recurrent network models for human dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4346–4354 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gers, F.A., Schmidhuber, J., Cummins, F.: Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput. 12(10), 2451–2471 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldhammer, M., Köhler, S., Doll, K., Sick, B.: Camera based pedestrian path prediction by means of polynomial least-squares approximation and multilayer perceptron neural networks. In: SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys), 2015, pp. 390–399. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graves, A.: Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.0850 (2013)
  7. 7.
    Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keller, C.G., Gavrila, D.M.: Will the pedestrian cross? A study on pedestrian path prediction. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15(2), 494–506 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kingma, D., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)
  10. 10.
    Kooij, J.F.P., Schneider, N., Flohr, F., Gavrila, D.M.: Context-based pedestrian path prediction. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8694, pp. 618–633. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, X., et al.: A new benchmark for vision-based cyclist detection. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1028–1033. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olah, C.: Understanding LSTM networks (2015). http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/
  13. 13.
    Pool, E.A., Kooij, J.F., Gavrila, D.M.: Using road topology to improve cyclist path prediction. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 289–296. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088), 533 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saleh, K., Hossny, M., Nahavandi, S.: Driving behavior classification based on sensor data fusion using LSTM recurrent neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saleh, K., Hossny, M., Nahavandi, S.: Intent prediction of vulnerable road users from motion trajectories using stacked LSTM network. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saleh, K., Hossny, M., Nahavandi, S.: Towards trusted autonomous vehicles from vulnerable road users perspective. In: 2017 Annual IEEE International on Systems Conference (SysCon), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider, N., Gavrila, D.M.: Pedestrian path prediction with recursive Bayesian filters: a comparative study. In: Weickert, J., Hein, M., Schiele, B. (eds.) GCPR 2013. LNCS, vol. 8142, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40602-7_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schuster, M., Paliwal, K.K.: Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45(11), 2673–2681 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zernetsch, S., Kohnen, S., Goldhammer, M., Doll, K., Sick, B.: Trajectory prediction of cyclists using a physical model and an artificial neural network. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 833–838. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khaled Saleh
    • 1
  • Mohammed Hossny
    • 1
  • Saeid Nahavandi
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI)Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations