Advertisement

A Dearth of Empirical Investigations

  • Klaus Schmerler
Chapter
Part of the Developments in Health Economics and Public Policy book series (HEPP, volume 13)

Abstract

This chapter outlines the motivation to engage in empirical investigations of medical tourism. While the medical tourism literature explores its legal and ethical issues in considerable detail, the absence of quantitative studies in this field has left stakeholders without appropriate empirical guidance. The author identifies stakeholder benefits that have been associated with medical tourism and briefly explains his focus on inbound medical tourism in Germany and on cultural proximity and networks as its drivers. ‘A Dearth of Empirical Investigations’ concludes with an outline of the book which connects the required groundwork in Chaps. 2 and 3 with the empirical investigations in Chaps. 4 through 6.

References

  1. Baker, D., & Rho, H. J. (2009). Free trade in health care: The gains from globalized medicare and medicaid. Washington, DC: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, I. G. (2010). Protecting patients with passports: Medical tourism and the patient-protective argument. Iowa Law Review, 95, 1467–1567.Google Scholar
  3. Davis, L., & Erixon, F. (2008). The health of nations: Conceptualizing approaches to trade in health care. ECIPE Policy Briefs 04/2008. European Centre for International Political Economy.Google Scholar
  4. Ehrbeck, T., Guevara, C., & Mango, P. D. (2008). Mapping the market for medical travel. Seattle, WA: The McKinsey Quarterly.Google Scholar
  5. European Union. (2011). Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare.Google Scholar
  6. Hanefeld, J., Horsfall, D., Lunt, N., & Smith, R. (2013). Medical tourism: A cost or benefit to the NHS? PLoS One, 8, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klusen, N., Verheyen, F., & Wagner, C. (Eds.). (2011). England and Germany in Europe: What lessons can we learn from each other?: European health care conference 2011 (Vol. 32, 1st ed. Beiträge zum Gesundheitsmanagement). Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verl.-Ges.Google Scholar
  8. Lunt, N., Smith, R., Exworthy, M., Green, S. T., Horsfall, D., & Mannion, R. (2011). Medical tourism: Treatments, markets and health system implications: A scoping review. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  9. Lunt, N., Horsfall, D., Smith, R., Exworthy, M., Hanefeld, J., & Mannion, R. (2014). Market size, market share and market strategy: Three myths of medical tourism. Policy & Politics, 42, 597–614.  https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X655918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosenmöller, M., McKee, M., & Baeten, R. (2006). Patient mobility in the European Union: Learning from experience. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  11. Schneider, M., Krauss, T., Hofmann, U., Köse, A., Ostwald, D. A., Gandjour, A., Gerlach, J., Hofman, S., Karmann, B., Legler, B., Marion, S. C., Karmann, A., Plaul, C., Henke, K.-D., Troppens, S., Braeseke, G., & Richter, T. (2015). Die Gesundheitswirtschaftliche Gesamtrechnung für Deutschland. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.Google Scholar
  12. Wagner, C., & Verheyen, F. (2010). TK-Europabefragung 2009: Deutsche Patienten auf dem Weg nach Europa. Hamburg: Techniker Krankenkasse.Google Scholar
  13. Xin, W. (2014). Taking wellness high-tech in prevention and rehabilitation. China Daily, 10.Google Scholar
  14. Ying, G. (2015). Desperation, money drive patients abroad. China Daily, 16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Schmerler
    • 1
  1. 1.Martin Luther University Halle-WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany

Personalised recommendations