Advertisement

Intervention-Oriented Designs

  • Oddbjørn Bukve
Chapter

Abstract

In the present chapter I discuss two types of intervention-oriented designs by looking at purpose and strategies in evaluation research and action research. My main argument is that comprehensive evaluations of interventions and measures must combine studies of process and effect. Measures, interventions, and reforms in society build on a more or less explicit theory of action about the effects of the measure. To evaluate the measures, we need to know something about the effects, and this can best be done through a variable-centred effect study with a control group. However, in order to develop knowledge about why the action succeeded or failed in producing the expected effects, we also need to analyse the underlying theories of action and implementation processes. Therefore, it is possible to talk about intervention-oriented designs as combinations of process-oriented and effect-oriented analysis.

References

  1. Andreassen, T. A., & Aars, J. (2015). Den store reformen: da NAV ble til. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duus, G., Husted, M., Kildedal, K., Laursen, E., & Tofteng, D. (2012). Aktionsforskning. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  5. Eikeland, O. (1997). Erfaring, dialogikk og politikk: den antikke dialogfilosofiens betydning for rekonstruksjonen av moderne empirisk samfunnsvitenskap: et begrepshistorisk og filosofisk bidrag. In ([3. utg]. ed., Vol. 11). Oslo: Det historisk-filosofiske fakultet, Universitetet i Oslo Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  6. Eikeland, O., & Nicolini, D. (2011). Turning practically: Broadening the horizon. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 164–174.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111119744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foss, O. (2000). Evaluering – samfunnsforskning i politikkens tjeneste. In O. Foss & J. Mønnesland (Eds.), Evaluering av offentlig virksomhet. Metoder og vurderinger. Oslo, Norway: NIBR.Google Scholar
  8. Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, H. F. (2005). Choosing evaluation models: A discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation, 11(4), 447–462.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005060265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nielsen, K. A. (2012). Aktionsforskningens historie – på vej til et refleksivt akademisk selskap. In G. Duus, M. Husted, K. Kildedal, E. Laursen, & D. Tofteng (Eds.), Aktionsforskning (pp. 19–36). Fredriksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  11. Øvretveit, J. (1990). Quality health services. London: Brunel Institute of Organisation and Social Studies, Brunel University.Google Scholar
  12. Resaland, G. K., Moe, V. F., Aadland, E., Steene-Johannessen, J., Glosvik, Ø., Andersen, J. R., et al. (2015). Active Smarter Kids (ASK): Rationale and design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of daily physical activity on children’s academic performance and risk factors for non-communicable diseases. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 709.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2049-y
  13. Ricoeur, P. (1988 (1986)). Det praktiske förnuftet. In Från text till handling: en antologi om hermeneutik (Orig.: Du texte à l’action, Essais d’hermenutiques) (Vol. 1, pp. 167–205). Stockholm: Brutus Östlings bokförlag Symposion.Google Scholar
  14. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Thorsrud, E., & Emery, F. E. (1970). Mot en ny bedriftsorganisasjon: eksperimenter i industrielt demokrati (Ny utg. ed. Vol. 2). Oslo: Tanum.Google Scholar
  18. Tornes, K. (2012). Evaluering i teori og praksis. Trondheim, Norway: Akademika.Google Scholar
  19. Vedung, E. (2009). Utvärdering i politik och förvaltning (3. uppl. ed.). Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oddbjørn Bukve
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Norway University of Applied SciencesSogndalNorway

Personalised recommendations