In this chapter, constitutive models as mathematical expressions describing mechanical behaviour of soils are introduced. They are classified based on the concept of incremental non-linearity (dependency of tangent stiffness on loading direction), with the aid of response envelope graphical representation. The classification is the best at highlighting the differences between hypoplasticity and the more common elasto-plastic modelling approaches.
- 2.Gudehus, G.: A comparison of some constitutive laws for soils under radially symmetric loading and unloading. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, pp. 1309–1323. Aachen (1979)Google Scholar
- 3.Gudehus, G., Mašín, D.: Graphical representation of constitutive equations. Géotechnique 59(2), 147–151 (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Darve, F.: The expression of rheological laws in incremental form and the main classes of constitutive equations. In: Darve, F. (ed.) Geomaterials: Constitutive Equations and Modelling, pp. 123–148. Elsevier (1990)Google Scholar
- 6.Houlsby, G.T., Puzrin, A.M.: Principles of Hyperplasticity: An Approach to Plasticity Theory Based on Thermodynamic Principles. Springer-Verlag, London Limited, London (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Roscoe, K.H., Burland, J.B.: On the generalised stress-strain behaviour of wet clay. In: Heyman, J., Leckie, F.A. (eds.) Engineering Plasticity, pp. 535–609. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1968)Google Scholar