This concluding chapter summarises the main findings of the book, including that recent concerns about the supposed crisis of health and safety since 2010 might not be so severe as commonly imagined. Via a series of observations on the legitimacy of health and safety, it highlights the differences between public opinions and attitudes as well as the historical continuities which have shaped health and safety since 1960. Core themes of participation, the contingency of change and the centrality of contest to the development of health and safety are picked out, before a future-oriented section argues for the benefit of looking to the past for insight on the future.
- Cameron, D. (2008, October 1). Quoted in Guardian. Online. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/oct/01/davidcameron.toryconference1.
- Department of Work and Pensions (DWP). (2011). Good Health and Safety, Good for Everyone. Online. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/good-health-and-safety.pdf.
- Löfstedt, R. (2011). Reclaiming Health and Safety for All: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation (The Löfstedt Review). London: Crown.Google Scholar
- Policy Exchange. (2010). Health and Safety: Reducing the Burden. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
- Young, L. (2010). Common Sense, Common Safety (The Young Review). London: Crown.Google Scholar
- Brown, T., & Hanlon, M. (2014). In the Interests of Safety: The Absurd Rules that Blight Our Lives and How We Can Change Them. London: Sphere.Google Scholar
- Divall, C. (2010). Mobilizing the History of Technology. Technology and Culture, 51(4), 938–960.Google Scholar
- Tversky, A. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar