Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Paul Almond
  • Mike Esbester
Chapter

Abstract

This concluding chapter summarises the main findings of the book, including that recent concerns about the supposed crisis of health and safety since 2010 might not be so severe as commonly imagined. Via a series of observations on the legitimacy of health and safety, it highlights the differences between public opinions and attitudes as well as the historical continuities which have shaped health and safety since 1960. Core themes of participation, the contingency of change and the centrality of contest to the development of health and safety are picked out, before a future-oriented section argues for the benefit of looking to the past for insight on the future.

References

Primary Sources

  1. Cameron, D. (2008, October 1). Quoted in Guardian. Online. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/oct/01/davidcameron.toryconference1.
  2. Department of Work and Pensions (DWP). (2011). Good Health and Safety, Good for Everyone. Online. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/good-health-and-safety.pdf.
  3. Löfstedt, R. (2011). Reclaiming Health and Safety for All: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation (The Löfstedt Review). London: Crown.Google Scholar
  4. Policy Exchange. (2010). Health and Safety: Reducing the Burden. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
  5. Young, L. (2010). Common Sense, Common Safety (The Young Review). London: Crown.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Almond, P. (2015). Revolution Blues: The Reconstruction of Health and Safety Law as ‘Common-Sense’ Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 42(2), 202–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, T., & Hanlon, M. (2014). In the Interests of Safety: The Absurd Rules that Blight Our Lives and How We Can Change Them. London: Sphere.Google Scholar
  3. Divall, C. (2010). Mobilizing the History of Technology. Technology and Culture, 51(4), 938–960.Google Scholar
  4. Geertz, C. (1975). Common Sense as a Cultural System. The Antioch Review, 33(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green, D. (2006). Public Opinion Versus Public Judgement About Crime: Correcting the ‘Comedy of Errors’. British Journal of Criminology, 46(1), 131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. James, P., & Walters, D. (2002). Worker Representation in Health and Safety: Options for Regulatory Reform. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(2), 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. James, P., Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2013). An Independent Review of British Health and Safety Regulation? From Common Sense to Non-sense. Policy Studies, 34(1), 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moran, M. (2003). The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Smismans, S. (2017). Risk Regulation at Risk: Brexit, Trump It, Risk It. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tversky, A. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Walters, D. (2006). One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Worker Representation and Health and Safety in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Health Services, 36(1), 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.School of Area Studies, History, Politics and LiteratureUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations