Justice and Values: Whose Interests Are Served?

  • Paul AlmondEmail author
  • Mike Esbester


This chapter explores the justice element of legitimacy—how far what has been done since 1960s accords with the values and demands of wider society and whose interests were served. It examines four major aspects: the commercialisation of health and safety; the notion of a ‘harmony of interests’ and a period of consensual working in the 1970s; the idea of worker autonomy and choice; and wider societal and workplace cultures, including around gendered roles that might have had a detrimental impact upon health and safety outcomes. The contested nature of health and safety is fundamental to this analysis, as is the position of lived experience.


Primary Sources

  1. Alexander, W. G. (1971, June 14). Verbal Evidence on Behalf of RoSPA to Robens Committee. The National Archives of the UK, London [TNA], LAB 96/75.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, K. R. (1963, November 9). ‘Training for Safety’, Talk Given to Central Metropolitan Group of the London Industrial Committee. Modern Records Centre, University of Warwick [MRC], MSS.292B/146/2/3.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous Interviewee. (2009). Interviewed by David Walker. Glasgow Dock Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC18 (2009).Google Scholar
  4. Barrow Docks Safety First Committee. (1959, October 1). Minutes. TNA, BK 9/48.Google Scholar
  5. British Rail. (1966, September 28). Minutes of meeting of Regional Accident Prevention Officers. TNA, AN 208/218.Google Scholar
  6. British Rail. (1967, May 9). ‘High Visibility Clothing’ memorandum. TNA, AN 171/683.Google Scholar
  7. British Rail. (1967, May 16). Meeting of Regional Accident Prevention Representatives. TNA, AN 208/218.Google Scholar
  8. British Rail. (n.d., c. 1971). ‘High Visibility Clothing’ memorandum, (n.d., c. May 1971). TNA, AN 171/683.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J. H. (1980, March). Letter to The Land Worker. Museum of English Rural Life, University of Reading [MERL].Google Scholar
  10. CBI. (1976). File of Employer Responses to the HSC’s Consultation on Safety Representatives. MRC, MSS.200/C/3/EMP/4/40.Google Scholar
  11. Council of Service Unions. (1982, March 2). Health of Women at Work. MRC, MSS.381/W/1/4/10.Google Scholar
  12. Coventry Health and Safety Movement. (n.d., c. 1979). Work Hazards 21: 19. Samuel Barr Collection, Glasgow Caledonian University [GCU] DC 140/2/1/2.Google Scholar
  13. Denning, J. (1985, January 17). The Hazards of Women’s Work. New Scientist, pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
  14. Dock and Harbour Authorities’ Association. (n.d., c. 1971). Written Evidence to the Robens Committee. TNA, LAB 96/57.Google Scholar
  15. Employment Committee. (1992). The Work of the Health and Safety Commission and Executive, Minutes of Evidence 12 February 1992 (HC 263; London: Crown).Google Scholar
  16. Equal Opportunities Commission. (1979, March). Health and Safety Legislation: Should We Distinguish Between Men and Women? MRC, MSS.222/AP/5/102.Google Scholar
  17. Esbester, M. (forthcoming). The Birth of Modern Safety: Preventing Worker Accidents on Britain’s Railways, 1871–1948. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  18. Foot, M. (1974, April 3). ‘Health and Safety at Work Etc. Bill’, HC Deb, Hansard Vol. 871 cc1286–1394, 1287.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, N. T. (1970, November 25). ‘Safety in the Seventies’, in Minutes of Teesside Industrial Accident Prevention Committee meeting. Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents [RoSPA] Archives, D.266/2/18/11.Google Scholar
  20. Greater London Council. (1985, March 23). Bulletin: ‘Danger: Women at Work’. Trades Union Congress [TUC] Library, HD 7268.Google Scholar
  21. Hampton, P. (2005). Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement (The Hampton Review). London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  22. KG. (2005). Interviewed by David Walker. Chemical Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC7 (2004–2005).Google Scholar
  23. Kinnock, N. (1973, May 21). ‘Workers’ Safety and Health’, HC Deb, Hansard vol. 857 cc62–117, 65.Google Scholar
  24. Lee, T. (n.d.). Portsmouth Dockyard Worker c.1933–81, Including as Safety Officer c.1963–76. Portsmouth Royal Dockyard Historical Trust (PRDHT) Interview, Accessed at Portsmouth History Centre (PHC), PD3/AD/185.Google Scholar
  25. Löfstedt, R. (2011). Reclaiming Health and Safety for All: An Independent Review of Health and Safety Legislation (The Löfstedt Review). London: Crown.Google Scholar
  26. Lord Drumalbyn. (1969, July 23). H. L. Deb., Hansard vol. 304, col. 1061.Google Scholar
  27. Lord Robens. (1972). Safety and Health at Work: Report of the Committee 1970–72 (The Robens Report). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  28. Lord Young. (2010). Common Sense, Common Safety [The Young Review]. London: Crown.Google Scholar
  29. May, D. (2005). Interviewed by David Walker. Chemical Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC7 (2004–2005).Google Scholar
  30. McGrath, J. (2009). Interviewed by David Walker. Glasgow Dock Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC18 (2009).Google Scholar
  31. McIntyre, O. (2009). Interviewed by David Walker. Glasgow Dock Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC18 (2009).Google Scholar
  32. McMillan, A. (2009). Interviewed by David Walker. Glasgow Dock Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC18 (2009).Google Scholar
  33. Ministry of Labour. (1964). Annual Report of the Chief Inspector of Factories, 1963 (Cmnd. 2450; London: Crown).Google Scholar
  34. National Union of Agricultural and Allied Workers. (1960–1961). Minutes of Health Safety and Welfare Committee, 12 October 1960, p. 1; 25 October 1961, p. 2. MERL, SR5NUAW BXXI/I.Google Scholar
  35. National Union of Agricultural and Allied Workers. (1967, March 21). Legal Department Memorandum to Executive Committee MERL, SR 5NUAW/B/XXI/4.Google Scholar
  36. O’Connor, T. (2009). Interviewed by David Walker. Glasgow Dock Workers Project, Scottish Oral History Centre, University of Strathclyde Archives and Special Collections, GB249 SOHC18 (2009).Google Scholar
  37. Parker, E. C. (n.d., c. 1979). Letter to Work Hazards 21, p. 17. Samuel Barr Collection, GCU DC 140/2/1/2.Google Scholar
  38. Policy Exchange. (2010). Health and Safety: Reducing the Burden. London: Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
  39. RoSPA. (1968). RoSPA’s Experience with Posters as an Aid to Accident Prevention. MRC, MSS.292B/146/17/2.Google Scholar
  40. Scarborough Evening News. (1963, May 3). Steel Men Say Safety Hats Make Them Look Ridiculous.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, C. (1974, April 3). Health and Safety at Work Etc. Bill’, HC Deb, Hansard vol. 871, c1322.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, T. (n.d.). Interview; Portsmouth Dockyard Worker c.1950s. PRDHT, PHC, PD3/LF/3.Google Scholar
  43. Stubbs, B. (n.d.). Interview; Portsmouth Dockyard worker c.1955–1980s, Including as Safety Officer. PRDHT, PHC PD3/AD/123.Google Scholar
  44. Swinden, T. A. (1962, November 12). Joint Industrial Conference on the Prevention of Accidents. TUC Library, HD 7273.Google Scholar
  45. Temple, M. (2014). Triennial Review Report: Health and Safety Executive [The Temple Review]. London: HMSO.
  46. Thompson, M. (c. 2000). Interviewed as Part of University of Aberdeen ‘Lives in the Oil Industry’ Project. British Library, London, C963/13.Google Scholar
  47. Trade Union Research Unit. (1974). Safety, Accidents and Collective Bargaining. TUC Library, HD 7262–7262.5.Google Scholar
  48. TUC. (n.d., c. 1999). Restoring the Balance. Women’s Health and Safety at Work. TUC Library, HD 7268.Google Scholar
  49. University of Aberdeen. (1993). The Effectiveness of Offshore Safety Representatives and Safety Committees, Report to HSE. TUC Library, HD 7269.Google Scholar
  50. Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Yard. (1968, April 18). Letter from Assistant Shipyard Manager to Shipyard Convenor of Shop Stewards. Samuel Barr Collection, GCU DC 140/1/1/5.Google Scholar
  51. Upper Clyde Shipbuilders Yard. (1970, April 14). Yard Council Meeting. Samuel Barr Collection, GCU DC 140/1/1/5.Google Scholar
  52. Verdon-Smith, D. A. (1970, June 9). Correspondence. TNA, AN 174/1522.Google Scholar
  53. Whitelaw, W. (1974, April 3). ‘Health and Safety at Work Etc. Bill’, HC Deb, Hansard vol. 871 c1302.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, R. (n.d., c. 1979). ‘A Key Issue’, Work Hazards 21 (c.1979). Samuel Barr Collection, GCU DC 140/2/1/2.Google Scholar
  55. Workington Safety Committee. (1978, November 7). Minutes. TNA, BK 9/14.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Almond, P. (2007). Regulation Crisis: Evaluating the Potential Legitimizing Effects of ‘Corporate Manslaughter’ Cases. Law and Policy, 29(3), 285–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, P. (2009). The Dangers of Hanging Baskets: Regulatory Myths’ and Media Representations of Health and Safety Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 36(3), 352–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almond, P. (2013). Corporate Manslaughter and Regulatory Reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Almond, P. (2015). Revolution Blues: The Reconstruction of Health and Safety Law as ‘Common-Sense’ Regulation. Journal of Law and Society, 42(2), 202–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almond, P., & Gray, G. C. (2017). Frontline Safety: Understanding the Workplace as a Site of Regulatory Engagement. Law & Policy, 39(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asher, R. (2003). Experience Counts: British Workers, Accident Prevention and Compensation, and the Origins of the Welfare State. Journal of Policy History, 15(4), 359–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baldwin, R. (1987). Health and Safety at Work: Consensus and Self-Regulation. In R. Baldwin & C. McCrudden (Eds.), Regulation and Public Law (pp. 132–158). London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
  8. Baldwin, R. (1995). Rules and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baldwin, R., & Black, J. (2016). Driving Priorities in Risk‐based Regulation: What’s the Problem? Journal of Law and Society, 43(4), 565–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banks, S. (2009). Woodley v Metropolitan District Railway Company (1877). In C. Mitchell & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort (pp. 127–152). Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  11. Bartrip, P. (2014). “Enveloped in Fog”: The Asbestos Problem in Britain’s Royal Naval Dockyards, 1949–1999. International Journal of Maritime History, 26(4), 685–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bartrip, P., & Burman, S. (1983). The Wounded Soldiers of Industry: Industrial Compensation Policy, 1833–1897. New York: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bartrip, P., & Fenn, P. T. (1983). The Evolution of Regulatory Style in the Nineteenth Century British Factory Inspectorate. Journal of Law and Society, 10(2), 201–222.Google Scholar
  14. Beck, M., & Woolfson, C. (2000). The Regulation of Health and Safety in Britain: From Old Labour to New Labour. Industrial Relations Journal, 31(1), 35–49.Google Scholar
  15. Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimacy of Power. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Black, J. (2005). The Emergence of Risk-based Regulation and the New Public Risk Management in the United Kingdom. Public Law, 512–549.Google Scholar
  17. Black, J. (2008). Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradley, D. (2012). Occupational Health and Safety in the Scottish Steel Industry, c.1930–1988: The Road to ‘Its Own Wee Empire’ (Unpublished PhD thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University).Google Scholar
  19. Braithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory Capitalism: How It Works, Ideas for Making It Work Better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Breyer, S. (1982). Regulation and Its Reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bronstein, J. (2008). Caught in the Machinery: Workplace Accidents and Injured Workers in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brown, H. W. (1931). Employers’ Liability Insurance. Transactions of the Faculty of Actuaries, 13(1), 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carson, W. G. (1979). The Conventionalisation of Early Factory Crime. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 7(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
  24. Clarke, L., & Wall, C. (2009). “A Woman’s Place is Where She Wants to Work”: Barriers to the Entry and Retention of Women into the Skilled Building Trades. Scottish Labour History, 44, 16–39.Google Scholar
  25. Dalton, A. J. P. (1998). Safety, Health and Environmental Hazards at the Workplace. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  26. Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. (1997). Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(4), 303–350.Google Scholar
  27. Dawson, S., Willman, P., Clinton, A., & Bamford, M. (1988). Safety at Work: The Limits of Self-Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dodds, A. (2006). The Core Executive’s Approach to Regulation: From ‘Better Regulation’ to ‘Risk-Tolerant Deregulation’. Social Policy & Administration, 40(5), 526–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ericson, R. V., & Doyle, A. (2003). Risk and Morality [eds.]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ewald, F. (2002). The Return of Descartes’s Malicious Demon: An Outline of a Philosophy of Precaution. In T. Baker & J. Simon (Eds.), Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility (pp. 273–302). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fudge, J., & Owens, R. (Eds.). (2006). Precarious Work, Women, and the New Economy: The Challenge to Legal Norms. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  32. Gray, G. C. (2009). The Responsibilization Strategy of Health and Safety: Neo-liberalism and the Reconfiguration of Individual Responsibility for Risk. British Journal of Criminology, 49(3), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Habermas, J. (1976). Communication and the Evolution of Society (F. G. Lawrence, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action: Book Two: The Critique of Functionalist Reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Halliday, S., Ilan, J., & Scott, C. (2011). The Public Management of Liability Risks. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31(3), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkins, K. (2002). Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hayes, N. (2002). Did Manual Workers Want Industrial Welfare? Canteens, Latrines and Masculinity on British Building Sites 1918–1970. Journal of Social History, 35(3), 637–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutter, B. (1997). Compliance: Regulation and Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. James, P., Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2013). An Independent Review of British Health and Safety Regulation? From Common Sense to Non-sense. Policy Studies, 34(1), 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2004). Dangerous Work, Hard Men and Broken Bodies: Masculinity in the Clydeside Heavy Industries, c.1930s–1970s. Labour History Review, 69(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnston, R., & McIvor, A. (2007). Miners’ Lung. A History of Dust Disease in British Coal Mining. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Kerr, P. (2005). Postwar British Politics: From Conflict to Consensus. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kostal, R. W. (1994). Law and English Railway Capitalism 1825–1875. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Leka, S., Jain, A., Hollis, D., Andreou, N., & Zwetsloot, G. (2012). The Changing Landscape of OSH Regulation in the UK: A Review. Leicester: IOSH.Google Scholar
  46. Leneman, L. (1993). Workmen’s Compensation at the Wemyss Coal Company 1906–1924. Scottish Economic & Social History, 13(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Long, V. (2011). The Rise and Fall of the Healthy Factory: The Politics of Industrial Health in Britain, 1914–60. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  48. Mascini, P., Achterberg, P., & Houtman, D. (2013). Neoliberalism and Work-Related Risks: Individual or Collective Responsibilization? Journal of Risk Research, 16(10), 1209–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDermott, V., & Hayes, J. (2018). Risk Shifting and Disorganization in Multi-Tier Contracting Chains: The Implications for Public Safety. Safety Science, 106, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McIvor, A. (2013). Working Lives: Work in Britain Since 1945. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. McIvor, A., & Johnston, R. (2002). Voices from the Pits: Health and Safety in Scottish Coal Mining Since 1945. Scottish Economic and Social History, 22(2), 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Melling, J. (2003). The Risks of Working and the Risks of Not Working: Trade Unions, Employers and Responses to the Risk of Occupational Illness in British Industry, c.1890–1940s (LSE Discussion Paper 12).Google Scholar
  53. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure and Myth and Ceremony. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Moran, M. (2003). The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morris, A. (2007). Spiralling or Stabilising? The Compensation Culture and Our Propensity to Claim Damages for Personal Injury. Modern Law Review, 70(3), 349–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nichols, T. (1997). The Sociology of Industrial Injury. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
  57. Nichols, T., & Armstrong, P. (1973). Safety or Profit?: Industrial Accidents and the Conventional Wisdom. London: Falling Wall.Google Scholar
  58. O’Malley, P. (2004). Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  59. Ogus, A. (1994). Regulation: Legal Forms and Economic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  60. Pidgeon, N., Walls, J., Weyman, A., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2003). Perceptions of and Trust in the Health and Safety Executive as a Risk Regulator [Research Report 100]. Sudbury: HSE Books.Google Scholar
  61. Pouliakas, K., & Theodossiou, I. (2013). The Economics of Health and Safety at Work: An Interdiciplinary Review of the Theory and Policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(1), 167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Prosser, T. (2006). Regulation and Social Solidarity. Journal of Law and Society, 33(3), 364–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Quinlan, M., Mayhew, C., & Bohle, P. (2001). The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research. International Journal of Health Services, 31(2), 335–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Scott, C. (2004). Regulation in the Age of Governance: the Rise of the Post-Regulatory State. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance (pp. 145–174). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  67. Silbey, S. S. (2009). Taming Prometheus: Talk About Safety Culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simpson, R. C. (1972). Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969. Modern Law Review, 35(1), 63–68.Google Scholar
  69. Sirrs, C. (2016). Risk, Responsibility and Robens: The Transformation of the British System of Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, 1961–1974. In T. Crook & M. Esbester (Eds.), Governing Risks in Modern Britain: Danger, Safety and Accidents, c.1800–2000 (pp. 249–276). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Smismans, S. (2017). Risk Regulation at Risk: Brexit, Trump It, Risk It. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(1), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Suchman, M. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Teubner, G. (1987). Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In R. Baldwin, C. Scott, & C. Hood (Eds.), A Reader on Regulation (pp. 389–440). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thane, P. (2018). Divided Kingdom: A History of Britain, 1900 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2010). A Deadly Consensus: Worker Safety and Regulatory Degradation under New Labour. British Journal of Criminology, 50(1), 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tombs, S., & Whyte, D. (2013). The Myths and Realities of Deterrence in Workplace Safety Regulation. British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 746–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tucker, E. (1995). And Defeat Goes On: An Assessment of Third-Wave Health and Safety Regulation. In F. Pearce & L. Snider (Eds.), Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates (pp. 245–267). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  77. Veljanovski, C. G. (1983). Regulatory Enforcement: An Economic Study of the British Factory Inspectorate. Law & Policy, 5(1), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Viscusi, W. K. (1983). Risk by Choice: Regulating Health and Safety in the Workplace. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Walls, J., Pidgeon, N., Weyman, A., & Horlick-Jones, T. (2004). Critical Trust: Understanding Lay Perceptions of Health and Safety Risk Regulation. Health, Risk, and Society, 6(2), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wright, M., Beardwell, C., Pennie, D., Smith, R., Norton Doyle, J., & Dimopoulos, E. (2008). Evidence-based Evaluation of the Scale of Disproportionate Decisions on Risk Assessment and Management (HSE Research Report 536). London: HSE Books.Google Scholar
  81. Young, H. (2010). Being a Man: Everyday Masculinities. In L. Abrams & C. G. Brown (Eds.), A History of Everyday Life in Scotland: Twentieth-Century Scotland (pp. 131–152). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Zwetsloot, G., van Scheppingen, A. R., Bos, E. H., Dijkman, A., & Starren, A. (2013). The Core Values that Support Health, Safety, and Well-Being at Work. Safety and Health at Work, 4(4), 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
  2. 2.School of Area Studies, History, Politics and LiteratureUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations