Advertisement

Acquirer’s Country of Origin and Target Firm’s Performance

  • Jinlong Gu
  • Yong Yang
  • Roger Strange
Chapter
Part of the The Academy of International Business book series (AIB)

Abstract

Cross-border acquisition is a pivotal strategy for a firm. Our chapter seeks to examine the relationship between an acquirer’s country of origin and performance of the target firm, and to uncover what factors strengthen or weaken this relationship. Drawing on over 3000 firm-year observations for the period 2004–13, we found that target firms acquired by foreign acquirers perform better than those acquired by domestic acquirers. This additional performance gain from foreign acquisition is positively moderated by the characteristics of the acquirer-target industry and ownership linkages. Specifically, we find that this additional performance gain becomes stronger for targets locating in the same industry as the acquirers, while weaker for targets whose low-level ownership is owned by the acquirers.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank comments from an anonymous referee. We also thank for comments from Mirko Benischke, Bert Jarreau, Christian Asmussen, Andreas Petrou, and conference participants at the Academy of International Business (UK and Ireland Chapter) in Birmingham, 12–14 April 2018, UK. We are responsible for all errors.

References

  1. Balsvik, R., & Haller, S. A. (2010). Picking “lemons” or picking “cherries”? Domestic and foreign acquisitions in Norwegian manufacturing. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 112(2), 361–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bebenroth, R., & Hemmert, M. (2015). Country-level antecedents of target firms’ post-acquisition business performance: A study of inbound Japanese and Korean M&As. Asian Business and Management, 14(4), 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, H., & Kaul, A. (2016). Replicating the multinationality-performance relationship: Is there an S-curve? Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2275–2290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertrand, O., & Zitouna, H. (2008). Domestic versus cross-border acquisitions: Which impact on the target firms’ performance? Applied Economics, 40(17), 2221–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. London: Macmillan and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley, P. J., & Strange, R. (2011). The governance of the multinational enterprise: Insights from internalization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 460–470.Google Scholar
  7. Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce. (1999). Methodologies for direct U.S. investment abroad. International direct investment studies by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. Cheng, L. T., & Chan, K. C. (1995). A comparative analysis of the characteristics of international takeovers. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(5), 637–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chidlow, A., Salciuviene, L., & Young, S. (2009). Regional determinants of inward FDI distribution in Poland. International Business Review, 18(2), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Claessens, S., & Van Horen, N. (2012). Being a foreigner among domestic banks: Asset or liability? Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(5), 1276–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conn, R. L., & Connell, F. (1990). International mergers: Returns to US and British firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 17(5), 689–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desai, M. A., Foley, C. F., & Hines, J. R. (2004). The costs of shared ownership: Evidence from international joint ventures. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 323–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewenter, K. L. (1995). Does the market react differently to domestic and foreign takeover announcements? Evidence from the US chemical and retail industries. Journal of Financial Economics, 37(3), 421–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Driffield, N., Love, J. H., & Yang, Y. (2016). Reverse international knowledge transfer in the MNE: (Where) does affiliate performance boost parent performance? Research Policy, 45(2), 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The theory of international production. The International Trade Journal, 3(1), 21–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Eun, C. S., Kolodny, R., & Scheraga, C. (1996). Cross-border acquisitions and shareholder wealth: Tests of the synergy and internalization hypotheses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(9), 1559–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaur, A. S., & Lu, J. W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaur, A. S., Delios, A., & Singh, K. (2007). Institutional environments, staffing strategies, and subsidiary performance. Journal of Management, 33(4), 611–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geluebcke, J. P. W. (2015). The impact of foreign takeovers: Comparative evidence from foreign and domestic acquisitions in Germany. Applied Economics, 47(8), 739–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haleblian, J., Devers, C. E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M. A., & Davison, R. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassan, I., Chidlow, A., & Romero-Martínez, A. M. (2016). Selection, valuation and performance assessment: Are these truly inter-linked within the M&A transactions? International Business Review, 25(1), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heugens, P. P., Van Essen, M., & van Oosterhout, J. H. (2009). Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: Towards a more fine-grained understanding. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3), 481–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiménez, A., Benito-Osorio, D., & Palmero-Cámara, C. (2015). Learning from risky environments: Global diversification strategies of Spanish MNEs. Management International Review, 55(4), 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, L., & Qian, G. (2005). Dimensions of international diversification: Their joint effects on firm performance. Journal of Global Marketing, 18(3–4), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, Q., Lu, R., & Qiu, L. D. (2017). Foreign acquisitions and target firms’ performance in China. The World Economy, 40(1), 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Majocchi, A., & Strange, R. (2012). International diversification: The impact of ownership structure, the market for corporate control and board independence. Management International Review, 52(6), 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moeller, S. B., & Schlingemann, F. P. (2005). Global diversification and bidder gains: A comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(3), 533–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ning, L., Kuo, J.-M., Strange, R., & Wang, B. (2014). International investors’ reactions to cross-border acquisitions by emerging market multinationals. International Business Review, 23(4), 811–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Panzar, J. C., & Willig, R. D. (1981). Economies of scope. The American Economic Review, 71(2), 268–272.Google Scholar
  34. Park, B. I., & Ghauri, P. N. (2011). Key factors affecting acquisition of technological capabilities from foreign acquiring firms by small and medium sized local firms. Journal of World Business, 46(1), 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Diversification strategy and profitability. Strategic Management Journal, 3(4), 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10(3), 307–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swenson, D. L. (1993). Foreign mergers and acquisitions in the United States. In K. A. Froot (Ed.), Foreign direct investment (pp. 255–284). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. UNCTAD. (2017). World investment report. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  39. Yang, Y., & Martins, P. S. (2011). Multinational performance and intellectual property rights: Evidence from 46 countries. In J. Berrill, E. Hutson, & R. Sinkovics (Eds.), Firm-level internationalization, regionalism and globalization (pp. 96–112). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, Y., & Singh, D. A. (2014). Foreign subsidiary location strategy and financial performance: A global value chain perspective. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.Google Scholar
  41. Yang, Y., Narayanan, V. K., & De Carolis, D. M. (2014). The relationship between portfolio diversification and firm value: The evidence from corporate venture capital activity. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1993–2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zaheer, S., & Mosakowski, E. (1997). The dynamics of the liability of foreignness: A global study of survival in financial services. Strategic Management Journal, 18(6), 439–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zou, H., & Ghauri, P. N. (2008). Learning through international acquisitions: The process of knowledge acquisition in China. Management International Review, 48(2), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinlong Gu
    • 1
  • Yong Yang
    • 1
  • Roger Strange
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Sussex Business SchoolBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations