Advertisement

Implementation Teams: A Stakeholder View of Leading and Sustaining Change

  • Allison MetzEmail author
  • Leah Bartley
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

An implementation team is a group of stakeholders that oversees, attends to, and is accountable for facilitating key activities in the selection, implementation, and continuous improvement of an intervention. There is growing attention on the important role of implementation teams in supporting the sustainable use of evidence to improve outcomes. This chapter provides a state-of-the-field as it relates to the use of implementation teams to support, scale, and sustain change efforts to produce population impacts. Competencies for implementation team members are also discussed.

Keywords

Implementation team evidence use stakeholder engagement competencies 

References

  1. Aarons, G. A. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57(8), 1162–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aarons, G. A., Sommerfeld, D. H., Hecht, D. B., Silovsky, J. F., & Chaffin, M. J. (2009). The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: Evidence for a protective effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aarons, G. A., Fettes, D., Hurlburt, M., Palinkas, L., Gunderson, L., Willging, C., & Chaffin, M. (2014). Collaboration, negotiation, and coalescence for interagency-collaborative teams to scale-up evidence-based practice. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(6), 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bammer, G. (2005). Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berta, W., Cranley, L., Dearing, J.W., Dogherty, E.J., Squires, J.E., & Estabrooks, C.A. (2015). Why (we think) facilitation works: Insights from organizational learning theory. Implementation Science, 10. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0.
  6. Bornbaum, C.C., Kornas, K., Peirson, L., & Rosella, L.C. (2015). Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Implementation Science, 10. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9.
  7. Brown, C.H., Chamberlain, P., Saldana, L., Padgett, C, Wang, W., & Cruden G. (2014). Evaluation of two implementation strategies in 51 child county public service systems in two states: Results of a cluster randomized head-to-head implementation trial. Implementation Science, 9. Retrieved online: https://www.springermedizin.de/evaluation-of-two-implementation-strategies-in-51-child-county-p/9772796.
  8. Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Aarons, G., Fettes, D., Hurlburt, M., & Ledesma, K. (2015). EBT fidelity trajectories across training cohorts using the interagency collaborative team strategy. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 144–156.Google Scholar
  9. Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2014). The dynamic sustainability framework: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science 8(1), 117. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
  10. Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2004). Getting to outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation (technical report). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  11. Chovil, N. (2009). One small step at a time: Implementing continuous quality improvement in child and youth mental health services. Child and Youth Services, 31, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI publication no. 231). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Network.Google Scholar
  15. Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M. A. (2008). Unpacking prevention capacity: An intersection of research-to-practice models and community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 182–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9162-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Green, A. E., Trott, E., Willging, C. E., Finn, N. K., Ehrhart, M. G., & Aarons, G. A. (2016). The role of collaborations in sustaining and evidence-based intervention to reduce child neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect, 53, 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgins, M. C., Young, L., Weiner, J., & Wlodaczyk, S. (2009). Leading teams of leaders: What helps team member learning? The Phi Delta Kappan, 91, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Higgins, M. C., Weiner, J., & Young, L. (2012). Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 366–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horner, R., Blitz, C., & Ross, S. W. (2014). Investing in what works issue brief: The role of contextual fit when implementing evidence-based interventions. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from https://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/eec2015_day01_breakoutc_ebp_issuebriefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hurlburt, M., Aarons, G. A., Fettes, D., Willging, C., Gunderson, L., & Chaffin, M. J. (2014). Interagency collaborative team model for capacity building to scale-up evidence-based practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joiner, T. A. (2007). Total quality management and performance: The role of organization support and coworker support. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Lau, R., Stevenson, F., Ong, B. N., Dziedzic, K., Treweek, S., Eldridge, S., … Peacock, R. (2015). Achieving change in primary care-effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: Systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 5(12), e009993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lessard, S., Bareil, C., Lalonde, L., Duhamel, F., Hudon, E.,….Levesque, L. (2016). External facilitators and interprofessional facilitation teams: A qualitative study of their roles in supporting practice change. Implementation Science, 11, 97. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-016-0458-7.
  26. Li, S. A., Jeffs, L., Barwick, M., & Stevens, B. (2018). Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: A systematic integrative review. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lorinkova, N. M., Pearsall, M. J., & Sims, H. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Medves, J., Godfrey, C., Turner, C., Paterson, M., Harrison, M., MacKenzie, L., & Durando, P. (2010). Systematic review of practice guideline dissemination and implementation strategies for healthcare teams and team-based practice. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 8, 79–89.Google Scholar
  29. Metz, A. (2016). Practice profiles: A process for capturing evidence and operationalizing innovations. Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active implementation frameworks for program success: How to use implementation science to improve outcomes for children. Zero to Three Journal, 34(4), 11–18.Google Scholar
  31. Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2015). Co-creating the conditions to sustain the use of research evidence in public child welfare. Child Welfare, 94(2), 115.Google Scholar
  32. Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2016). Co-creating the conditions to sustain the use of research evidence in public child welfare. Child Welfare, 94, 115–139.Google Scholar
  33. Metz, A., Bartley, L., Ball, H., Wilson, D., Naoom, S., & Redmond, P. (2015). Active implementation frameworks for successful service delivery: Catawba County child wellbeing project. Research on Social Work Practice, 25, 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Metz, A., Naoom, S. F., Halle, T., & Bartley, L. (2015). An integrated stage-based framework for implementation of early childhood programs and systems (OPRE Research Brief 2015–48). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  35. Metz, A., Louison, L., Ward, C., & Burke, K. (2017). Active implementation practitioner profile. The National Implementation Research Network. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  36. Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The quality implementation framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 462–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moullin, J. C., Ehrhart, M. G., & Aarons, G. A. (2017). The role of leadership in organizational implementation and sustainment in service agencies. Research on Social Work Practice. 1049731517718361.Google Scholar
  38. Neilsen, K., Randall, R., & Christensen. (2017). Do different training conditions facilitate team implementation? A quasi-experimental mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11, 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Permanency Innovations Initiative Training and Technical Assistance Project. (2016). Guide to developing, implementing, and assessing an innovation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
  40. Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., … Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the expert recommendations for implementation (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rycroft-Malone, J., Seers, K., Chandler, J., Hawkes, C. A., Crichton, N., Allen, C., … Strunin, L. (2013). The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: Implications for the development of the PARIHS framework. Implementation Science, 8, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singer, S. J., Benzer, J. K., & Hamdan, S. U. (2015). Improving health care quality and safety: The role of collective learning. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 7, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Saldana, L., & Chamberlain, P. (2012). Supporting implementation: The role of community development teams to build infrastructure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 334–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorgenfrei, M., & Wrigley, R. (2005). Building analytical and adaptive capacities for organizational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: INTRAC.Google Scholar
  45. Sprigg, C., Jackson, P., & Parker, S. (2000). Production teamworking: The importance of interdependence and autonomy for employee strain and satisfaction. Human Relations, 53, 1519–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stirman, S. W., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation science, 7(1), 17.Google Scholar
  47. Supplee, L., & Metz, A. (2015). Opportunities and challenges in evidence-based social policy. Social Policy Report, 28(4), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. V. (2005). Team diagnostic survey: Development of an instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations