Implementation Teams: A Stakeholder View of Leading and Sustaining Change
- 15 Downloads
An implementation team is a group of stakeholders that oversees, attends to, and is accountable for facilitating key activities in the selection, implementation, and continuous improvement of an intervention. There is growing attention on the important role of implementation teams in supporting the sustainable use of evidence to improve outcomes. This chapter provides a state-of-the-field as it relates to the use of implementation teams to support, scale, and sustain change efforts to produce population impacts. Competencies for implementation team members are also discussed.
KeywordsImplementation team evidence use stakeholder engagement competencies
- Aarons, G. A., Sommerfeld, D. H., Hecht, D. B., Silovsky, J. F., & Chaffin, M. J. (2009). The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: Evidence for a protective effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aarons, G. A., Fettes, D., Hurlburt, M., Palinkas, L., Gunderson, L., Willging, C., & Chaffin, M. (2014). Collaboration, negotiation, and coalescence for interagency-collaborative teams to scale-up evidence-based practice. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(6), 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berta, W., Cranley, L., Dearing, J.W., Dogherty, E.J., Squires, J.E., & Estabrooks, C.A. (2015). Why (we think) facilitation works: Insights from organizational learning theory. Implementation Science, 10. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-015-0323-0.
- Bornbaum, C.C., Kornas, K., Peirson, L., & Rosella, L.C. (2015). Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Implementation Science, 10. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9.
- Brown, C.H., Chamberlain, P., Saldana, L., Padgett, C, Wang, W., & Cruden G. (2014). Evaluation of two implementation strategies in 51 child county public service systems in two states: Results of a cluster randomized head-to-head implementation trial. Implementation Science, 9. Retrieved online: https://www.springermedizin.de/evaluation-of-two-implementation-strategies-in-51-child-county-p/9772796.
- Chaffin, M., Hecht, D., Aarons, G., Fettes, D., Hurlburt, M., & Ledesma, K. (2015). EBT fidelity trajectories across training cohorts using the interagency collaborative team strategy. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 144–156.Google Scholar
- Chambers, D. A., Glasgow, R. E., & Stange, K. C. (2014). The dynamic sustainability framework: Addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science 8(1), 117. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
- Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2004). Getting to outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation (technical report). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
- Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI publication no. 231). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Network.Google Scholar
- Flaspohler, P., Duffy, J., Wandersman, A., Stillman, L., & Maras, M. A. (2008). Unpacking prevention capacity: An intersection of research-to-practice models and community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9162-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Horner, R., Blitz, C., & Ross, S. W. (2014). Investing in what works issue brief: The role of contextual fit when implementing evidence-based interventions. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from https://www.cde.state.co.us/cdesped/eec2015_day01_breakoutc_ebp_issuebriefGoogle Scholar
- Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision-making (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Lessard, S., Bareil, C., Lalonde, L., Duhamel, F., Hudon, E.,….Levesque, L. (2016). External facilitators and interprofessional facilitation teams: A qualitative study of their roles in supporting practice change. Implementation Science, 11, 97. Retrieved online: https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-016-0458-7.
- Medves, J., Godfrey, C., Turner, C., Paterson, M., Harrison, M., MacKenzie, L., & Durando, P. (2010). Systematic review of practice guideline dissemination and implementation strategies for healthcare teams and team-based practice. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, 8, 79–89.Google Scholar
- Metz, A. (2016). Practice profiles: A process for capturing evidence and operationalizing innovations. Chapel Hill, NC: National Implementation Research Network, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
- Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active implementation frameworks for program success: How to use implementation science to improve outcomes for children. Zero to Three Journal, 34(4), 11–18.Google Scholar
- Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2015). Co-creating the conditions to sustain the use of research evidence in public child welfare. Child Welfare, 94(2), 115.Google Scholar
- Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2016). Co-creating the conditions to sustain the use of research evidence in public child welfare. Child Welfare, 94, 115–139.Google Scholar
- Metz, A., Naoom, S. F., Halle, T., & Bartley, L. (2015). An integrated stage-based framework for implementation of early childhood programs and systems (OPRE Research Brief 2015–48). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Metz, A., Louison, L., Ward, C., & Burke, K. (2017). Active implementation practitioner profile. The National Implementation Research Network. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Moullin, J. C., Ehrhart, M. G., & Aarons, G. A. (2017). The role of leadership in organizational implementation and sustainment in service agencies. Research on Social Work Practice. 1049731517718361.Google Scholar
- Permanency Innovations Initiative Training and Technical Assistance Project. (2016). Guide to developing, implementing, and assessing an innovation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau.Google Scholar
- Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., … Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the expert recommendations for implementation (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sorgenfrei, M., & Wrigley, R. (2005). Building analytical and adaptive capacities for organizational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: INTRAC.Google Scholar
- Stirman, S. W., Kimberly, J., Cook, N., Calloway, A., Castro, F., & Charns, M. (2012). The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation science, 7(1), 17.Google Scholar