Advertisement

The Scale-Up of Linked Multilevel Interventions: A Case Study

  • Fred WulczynEmail author
  • Sara Feldman
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe the scale-up and impact of a linked multilevel intervention in a public child welfare system. Linked multilevel interventions are interventions with multiple components that target one or more levels within the systems. In health care, multilevel interventions are gaining traction, but there are few references to multilevel interventions in the child welfare despite obvious parallels. Families with children in the child welfare system face challenges across multiple life domains, and the systems designed to serve those families are administratively and financially interdependent. Single prong interventions that address one level of the service system while ignoring the interdependencies may be less effective. In this chapter, we describe one attempt to align the interdependencies in ways that improve the chances an intervention will have its intended effect.

Keywords

Linked multilevel intervention Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) Evidence-based models Keeping foster parents supported and trained (KEEP) Parenting through change for reunification (PTC-R) Parent training programs Staff capacity Administrative intervention Fiscal intervention R3 Placement stability Permanency rates 

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. C. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4–23.Google Scholar
  2. Chamberlain, P., Feldman, S. W., Wulczyn, F., Saldana, L., & Forgatch, M. (2016). Implementation and evaluation of linked parenting models in a large urban child welfare system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 53, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chamberlain, P., Price, J., Leve, L., Laurent, H., Landsverk, J., & Reid, J. (2008). Prevention of behavior problems for children in foster care: Outcomes and mediation effects. Prevention Science, 9(1), 17–27. [PMC: 18185995].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Greeno, E. J., Uretsky, M. C., Lee, B. R., Moore, J. E., Barth, R. P., & Shaw, T. V. (2016). Replication of the KEEP Foster and Kinship parent training program in a population of youth with externalizing behavior problems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 61, 75–82.Google Scholar
  5. Huang, T. T., Drewnosksi, A., Kumanyika, S., & Glass, T. A. (2009). A systems-oriented multilevel framework for addressing obesity in the 21st century. Preventing Chronic Disease, 6(3), A82.Google Scholar
  6. McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Whitley, R., Bond, G. R., Campbell, K., Rapp, C. A., … Finnerty, M. T. (2007). Fidelity outcomes in the National Implementing Evidence-Based Practices Project. Psychiatric Services, 58(10), 1279–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Price, J., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., & Reid, J. B. (2009). KEEP foster parent training intervention: Model description and effectiveness. Child and Family Social Work, 14, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Price, J. M., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J., Reid, J., Leve, L., & Laurent, H. (2008). Effects of a foster parent training intervention on placement changes of children in foster care. Child Maltreatment, 13(1), 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scott, P. A., Meurer, W. J., Frederiksen, S. M., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Xu, Z., Haan, M. N., et al. (2013). A multilevel intervention to increase community hospital use of alteplase for acute stroke (INSTINCT): A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurology, 12(2), 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trickett, E. J., & Beehler, S. (2013). The ecology of multilevel interventions to reduce social inequalities in health. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(8), 1227–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wulczyn, F. (2000). Federal fiscal reform in child welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wulczyn, F., Alpert, L., Orlebeke, B., & Haight, J. (2014). Principles, language, and shared meaning: Toward a common understanding of CQI in child welfare (pp. 1–18). Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children.Google Scholar
  13. Wulczyn, F., Daro, D., Fluke, J., Feldman, S., Glodek, C., & Lifanda, K. (2010). Adapting a systems approach to child protection. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  14. Wulczyn, F., & Halloran, J. (2017). Foster care dynamics and system science: Implications for research and policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1181–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wulczyn, F., Kogan, J., & Harden, B. (2003). Placement stability and movement trajectories. Social Service Review, 77, 212–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wulczyn, F., & Orlebeke, B. (2000). Fiscal reform and managed care in child welfare services. Policy and Practice of Public Human Services, 58, 26–31.Google Scholar
  17. Wulczyn, F., & Orlebeke, B. (2006). Getting what we pay for: Do expenditures align with outcomes in the child welfare system? No. 106 (pp. 1–8). Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for State Child Welfare Data, Chapin Hall Center for ChildrenUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations