Advertisement

Thirteen Types of Rent in the Globalized World

  • Péter Mihályi
  • Iván Szelényi
Chapter

Abstract

Scarcity rent was already identified and analyzed by Ricardo, but the concept of solidarity rent is the present authors’ innovation; then further sub-categories are introduced in this chapter. The rent-based interpretation of the importance of the natural resource sector is further generalized in this chapter. As Nicholas Kaldor and János Kornai have contended for decades, perfect competition exists only in economic textbooks. In reality, markets are oligopolistic not only in agriculture, in the extracting industries (as Ricardo thought), but also in the manufacturing and service sectors, too. The most efficient firms have always harness higher than average profits through larger mark-ups, or using this book’s own terminology: they collect scarcity rent.

Keywords

Scarcity rent Solidarity rent Oligopolies Intellectual property rights Occupational licenses Minimum wages Pay-as-you-go pensions Trade unions 

References

  1. Aghion, Philippe, Ufuk Akcigit, Antonin Bergeaud, Richard William Blundell, and David Hemous. 2015. Innovation and Top Income Inequality. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 10659.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, Dan, Chiara Criscuolo, and Peter N. Gal. 2015. Frontier Firms, Technology Diffusion and Public Policy: Micro Evidence from OECD Countries. The Future of Productivity: Main Background Papers. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  3. Autor, David, David Dorn, F. Lawrence Katz, Christina Patterson, and John Van Reenen. 2017. The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms. NBER Working Paper No. 23396, May.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, G. 2014. The Son Also Rises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Engels, Jens Ivo. 2014. Die Geschichte der Korruption: Von der Frühen Neuzeit bis ins 20. Jahrhundert [The History of Corruption: From the Early Modern Period to the 20th Century]. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  6. Felipe, Jesus, and John S.L. McCombie. 2013. The Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change: ‘Not Even Wrong’. Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Furman, Jason, and Peter Orszag. 2015. A Firm-Level Perspective on the Role of Rents in the Rise in Inequality. Presentation at “A Just Society” Centennial Event in Honor of Joseph Stiglitz Columbia University, 16 October. Manuscript.Google Scholar
  8. Guerriero, Marta. 2012. The Labor Share of Income Around the World: Evidence from a Panel Dataset. University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management, Working Paper No. 32.Google Scholar
  9. Henderson, Bruce. 1976. The Rule of Three and Four, ld. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/Classics/strategy_the_rule_of_three_and_four/.
  10. International Labour Office. 2017. Global Estimates of Child Labour: Results and Trends, 2012–2016. Geneva.Google Scholar
  11. Kaldor, Nicholas. [1934a] 1960: A Classificatory Note on the Determinateness of Equilibrium. In Essays on Value and Distribution, 13–33. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  12. Kaldor, Nicholas. [1934b] 1960. The Equilibrium of the Firm. In Essays on Value and Distribution, 34–50. London: Duckworth. Google Scholar
  13. Kaldor, Nicholas. [1935] 1960. Market Imperfection and Excess Capacity. In Essays on Value and Distribution, 62–80. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  14. Kaldor, Nicholas. [1938] 1960. Professor Chamberlin on Monopolistic and Imperfect Competition. In Essays on Value and Distribution, 81–95. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  15. Keen, Steve. 2011. Debunking Economics—Revised and Expanded Edition. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  16. Kornai, János. 1971. Anti-equilibrium (On Economic Systems: Theory and the Tasks of Research). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Lindsey, Brink, and Steven M. Teles. 2017. The Captured Economy (How the Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth and Increase Inequality). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics, 8th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Moseley, F. 2014. Piketty and Marginal Productivity Theory: A Superficial Application of a Very Bad Theory. Manuscript. https://www.aeaweb.org/conference/2015/retrieve.php?pdfid=942. Date last accessed 5 December 2016.
  20. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reeves, Martin, Mike Deimler, George Stalk, and Filippo L. Scognamiglio Pasini. 2012. BCG Classics Revisited, the Rule of Three and Four. www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/business_unit_strategy_the_rule_of_three_and_four_bcg_classics_revisited/.
  22. Roemer, John. 1982. A General Theory of Exploitation and Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sorensen, Aage B. 1996. The Structural Basis of Inequality. American Journal of Sociology 101 (5): 1333–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sorensen, Aage B. 2000. Toward a Sounder Basis for Class Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 6: 1523–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stiglitz, Joseph. 1992. Economics. New York and London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2015a. New Theoretical Perspectives on the Distribution of Income and Wealth Among Individuals, Parts I–IV. NBER Working Paper Series, 21189, 21190, 21191, 21192.Google Scholar
  27. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2015b. The Origins of Inequality, and Policies to Contain It. National Tax Journal 68 (2): 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weeden, Kim A., and David Grusky. 2014. Inequality and Market Failure. American Behavioral Scientist 58 (3): 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MacroeconomicsCorvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Central European UniversityBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.New York UniversityAbu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations