Advertisement

Towards an Ontological Modelling of Preference Relations

  • Daniele PorelloEmail author
  • Giancarlo Guizzardi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11298)

Abstract

Preference relations are intensively studied in Economics, but they are also approached in AI, Knowledge Representation, and Conceptual Modelling, as they provide a key concept in a variety of domains of application. In this paper, we propose an ontological foundation of preference relations to formalise their essential aspects across domains. Firstly, we shall discuss what is the ontological status of the relata of a preference relation. Secondly, we investigate the place of preference relations within a rich taxonomy of relations (e.g. we ask whether they are internal or external, essential or contingent, descriptive or non-descriptive relations). Finally, we provide an ontological modelling of preference relation as a module of a foundational (or upper) ontology (viz. OntoUML).

The aim of this paper is to provide a sharable foundational theory of preference relation that foster interoperability across the heterogeneous domains of application of preference relations.

Keywords

Preference relations Ontology of relations Foundational ontology Conceptual model OntoUML 

References

  1. 1.
    Arrow, K.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University, Monograph 12. Yale University Press, New Haven (1963)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgo, S., Masolo, C.: Foundational choices in DOLCE. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 361–381. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratman, M.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dietrich, F., List, C.: A reason-based theory of rational choice. Nous 47(1), 104–134 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dietrich, F., List, C.: Where do preferences come from? Int. J. Game Theor. 42(3), 613–637 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gärdenfors, P.: The geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G.: Relationships and events: towards a general theory of reification and truthmaking. In: Adorni, G., Cagnoni, S., Gori, M., Maratea, M. (eds.) AI*IA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10037, pp. 237–249. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49130-1_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guizzardi, G., Fonseca, C., Benevides, A.B., Almeida, J., Porello, D., Sales, T.: Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: towards OntoUML 2.0. In: Trujillo, J., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 136–150. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D. thesis, CTIT, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, Enschede (2005). http://doc.utwente.nl/50826/
  10. 10.
    Kreps, D.: Notes on the Theory of Choice. Underground Classics in Economics. Avalon Publishing, New York (1988). https://books.google.it/books?id=9D0Oljs5GrQC
  11. 11.
    List, C., Pettit, P.: Group Agency. The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacBride, F.: Truthmakers. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, fall 2016. Stanford University, Stanford (2016). Metaphysics Research LabGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masolo, C., et al.: Social roles and their descriptions. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR2004, 2–5 June 2004, Whistler, Canada, pp. 267–277 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore, G.E.: External and internal relations. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 20, 40–62 (1919)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ottonelli, V., Porello, D.: On the elusive notion of meta-agreement. Polit. Philos. Econ. 12(1), 68–92 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parsons, J.: There is no truthmaker argument against nominalism. Australas. J. Philos. 77(3), 325–334 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porello, D.: Ranking judgments in arrow’s setting. Synthese 173(2), 199–210 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Porello, D.: A proof-theoretical view of collective rationality. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2013, 3–9 August 2013, Beijing, China (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porello, D.: Single-peakedness and semantic dimensions of preferences. Logic J. IGPL 24(4), 570–583 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Porello, D.: Logics for modelling collective attitudes. Fundam. Inform. 158(1–3), 239–275 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Porello, D., Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R.: The ontology of group agency. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS 2014, 22–25 September 2014, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 183–196 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Porello, D., Guizzardi, G.: Towards a first-order modal formalisation of the unified foundational ontology. In: Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops 2017 Episode 3: The Tyrolean Autumn of Ontology, 21–23 September 2017, Bozen-Bolzano, Italy (2017)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. KR 91, 473–484 (1991)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Roemer, J.E.: Theories of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russell, B.: Philosophical Essays. Routledge, Abingdon (1910)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sales, T., Porello, D., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J., Guarino, N.: Ontological foundations of competition. In: 10th International Conference on Formal Ontologies and Information Systems, FOIS 2018, Cape Town, South Africa (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: 37th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER) (2018)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sales, T.P., Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., Mylopoulos, J.: An ontological analysis of value propositions. In: 21st IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, EDOC 2017, 10–13 October 2017, Quebec City, QC, Canada, pp. 184–193 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Free University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly

Personalised recommendations