Advertisement

The Delphi Research Process

  • Xufan ZhangEmail author
  • Michael Roe
Chapter

Abstract

The Delphi technique is clearly a suitable methodology for primary data collection in the analysis of the impacts of the CSI on EU container seaport competition. Various sources have claimed that the US maritime security initiatives have either positive or negative effects on EU container port competitiveness. Based on that, the conceptual model and related assumptions were developed to achieve the research aim and objectives. The conceptual model structured five assumptions that derived a list of statements, which in turn were used to formulate Delphi round one. This chapter presents the process used to analyse the results from the Delphi survey. It starts with the presentation of the pilot study and then outlines the process of each round of Delphi. The results of the three rounds are presented, including the response rate, the consensus level and formulation of next round statement if one does not reach consensus. For statements that reach consensus level, comments and discussions will be presented in Chapter  7.

References

  1. Abdel-Fattah, N. (1997). Privatisation of the Road Freight Industry in Egypt and Hungary (PhD thesis). University of Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing Social Research (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Cottam, H. (2012). An Analysis of Eastern European Liner Shipping During the Period of Transition (PhD thesis). University of Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Cottam, H., Roe, M., & Challacombe, J. (2004). Outsourcing of trucking activities by relief organisations. Journal of Humanitarian Assistance, 1(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Goluchowicz, K., & Blind, K. (2011). Identification of future fields of standardisation: An explorative application of the Delphi methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1526–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goodman, C. M. (1987). The Delphi technique: A critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12, 729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grix, J. (2004). The Foundations of Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Peat, J., Mellis, C., Williams, K., & Xuan, W. (2002). Health Science Research: A Handbook of Quantitative Methods. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Von der Gracht, H. A. (2008). The Future of Logistics: Scenarios for 2025. Berlin: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LogisticsBeijing WuZi UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of ManagementPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations