Advertisement

Models of Container Port Security

  • Xufan ZhangEmail author
  • Michael Roe
Chapter

Abstract

Maritime security issues and their framework, the Container Security Initiative (CSI) and its controversial implications and port competition theories have been thoroughly reviewed. A study on the long-term analysis on the effects of security initiatives on EU seaports is needed to fill the research gaps which have been identified. This chapter focuses on the CSI and its implications for EU container seaport competition. A conceptual model and five conceptual assumptions are developed to assist to achieve the aim and objectives.

References

  1. Allen, N. H. (2006). The container security initiative costs, implications and relevance to developing countries. Public Administration and Development, 26(5), 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. M., Park, Y. A., Chang, Y. T., Yang, C. H., Lee, T. W., & Luo, M. (2008). A game-theoretic analysis of competition among container port hubs: The case of Busan and Shanghai. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babione, R., Kim, C. K., Phone, E., & Sanjaya, E. (2003). Post 9/11 Security Cost Impact on Port of Seattle Import/Export Container Traffic (Working Paper GTTL 502). The University of Washington.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, A. C., & Chin, Y. Z. (2008). 100% Container Scanning: Security Policy Implications for Global Supply Chains (Master of Science Dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Bichou, K. (2004). The ISPS Code and the cost of port compliance: An initial logistics and supply chain framework for port security assessment and management. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bichou, K. (2008). Security and risk-based models in shipping and ports: Review and critical analysis, in ITF, terrorism and international transport: Towards risk-based security policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bichou, K. (2011). Assessing the impact of procedural security on container port efficiency. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 13(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bichou, K., & Evans, A. (2007). Maritime security and regulatory risk-based models: Review and critical analysis. In K. Bichou, M. G. H. Bell, & A. Evans (Eds.), Risk Management in Port Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Security (pp. 265–280). London: Informa.Google Scholar
  9. Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research A, 39, 75–92.Google Scholar
  10. Bichou, K., Lai, K. H., Lun, Y. H. V., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2007). A quality management framework for liner shipping companies to implement the 24-hour advance vessel manifest rule. Transportation Journal, 46(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
  11. Crutch, M. (2006). The Benefits of Investing in Global Supply Chain Security: Executive Summary from the DVDR 2006 Roundtable Meeting. Lehigh University Centre for Value Chain Research.Google Scholar
  12. Cullinane, K., Fei, W. T., & Cullinane, S. (2004). Container terminal development in Mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong. Transport Reviews, 24(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dekker, S., & Stevens, H. (2007). Maritime security in the European Union-empirical findings on financial implications for port facilities. Maritime Policy and Management, 34(5), 458–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleming, D. K., & Baird, A. J. (1999). Some reflections on port competition in the United States and Western Europe. Maritime Policy and Management, 26(4), 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fung, K. F. (2001). Competition between the ports of Hong Kong and Singapore: A structural vector error correction model to forecast the demand for container handling services. Maritime Policy and Management, 27(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gutiérrez, X., Hintsa, J., Wieser, P., & Hameri, A. P. (2007). Voluntary supply chain security program impacts: An empirical study with BASC member companies. World Customs Journal, 1(2), 31–48.Google Scholar
  17. Huybrechts, M., Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., Van Hooydonk, E., Verbeke, A., & Winkelmans, W. (Eds.). (2002). Port Competitiveness: An Economic and Legal Analysis of the Factors Determining the Competitiveness of Seaports. Antwerp: De Boeck Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Jeon, I.-S., Kim, H.-S., & Kim, B.-J. (1993). Strategy for Improvement of Competitive Power in Korea Container Port. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, H.-S. (1993). Decision Components of Shippers’ Port Choice in Korea. Seoul: Korea Maritime Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Kruk, C., & Donner, M. (2008). Review of Cost of Compliance with The New International Freight Transport Security Requirements. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, H. L., & Whang, S. (2005). Higher supply chain security with lower cost: Lessons from total quality management. International Journal of Production Economies, 96(3), 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malchow, M. B., & Kanafani, A. (2004). A disaggregate analysis of port selection. Transportation Research Part E, 40, 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, J. (2007, October 25). New Shipping Law Makes Big Waves in Foreign Ports. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. (2003). Maritime Transport Committee Security in Maritime Transport: Risk Factors and Economic Impact. Available at https://www.oecd.org/newsroom/4375896.pdf.
  25. Park, H. G. (2013). Impact of Supply Chain Security Orientation on Port Performance (PhD dissertation). Cardiff University, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Parliament of Australia. (2003). The US Container Security Initiative and Its Implications for Australia. Available at http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/Publications_Archive/CIB/cib0203/03cib27.
  27. Parola, F., Risitano, M., Ferretti, M., & Panetti, E. (2017). The drivers of port competitiveness: A critical review. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 116–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabadi, G., PintoI, C. A., Talley, W., & Arnaout, J. P. (2007). Port recovery from security incidents: A simulation approach. In K. Bichou, M. Bell, & A. Evans (Eds.), Risk Management in Port Operations, Logistics and Supply Chain Security (pp. 83–94). London: Informa.Google Scholar
  29. Song, D. W., & Yeo, K.-T. (2004). A competitive analysis of Chinese container ports using the analytic hierarchy process. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 6, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stasinopoulos, D. (2003). Maritime security: The need for a global agreement. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(3), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Talas, R., & Menachof, D. (2009). The efficient tradeoff between security and cost for seaports: A conceptual model. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 13(1), 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thai, V. V. (2007). Impacts of security improvements on service quality in maritime transport: An empirical study of Vietnam. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9(4), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thibault, M., Brooks, M., & Button, K. (2006). The response of the US maritime industry to the new container security initiatives. Transportation Journal, 45(1), 5–15.Google Scholar
  34. Timlen, T. (2007, April/May). The ISPS Code: Where are we now? Cargo Security International, 5(3), 14–15.Google Scholar
  35. Tiwari, P., Itoh, H., & Doi, M. (2003). Shippers’ port and carrier selection behaviour in China: A discrete choice analysis. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 5(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tongzon, J., & Heng, W. (2005). Port privatisation, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(5), 405–424.Google Scholar
  37. UNCTAD. (2004, February 26). Container Security: Major Initiatives and Related International Developments. Report by the UCTAD Secretariat, Geneva.Google Scholar
  38. UNCTAD. (2007). Maritime Security: ISPS Code Implementation, Costs and Related Financing UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/2007. Available at http://unctad.org/en/Docs/sdtetlb20071_en.pdf.
  39. Urciuoli, L., Sternberg, H., & Ekwall, D. (2010, July 11–15). The Effects of Security on Transport Performances. Paper Presented at the 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  40. Valentine, V. F. (2002). Measuring Efficiency of Container Ports: An Analysis By Organisational and Ownership Structure (PhD thesis). Plymouth University, UK.Google Scholar
  41. Voss, M., Whipple, J., & Closs, D. (2009). The role of strategic security: Internal and external security measures with security performance implications. Transportation Journal, 48(2), 5–23.Google Scholar
  42. WSC. (2007). Statement Regarding Legislation to Require 100% Container Scanning. Available at http://www.worldshipping.org/pdf/wsc_legislation_statement.pdf.
  43. Yang, Y. C. (2010). Impact of the container security initiative on Taiwan’s shipping industry. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(7), 699–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yap, W. Y., Lam, J. S. J., & Notteboom, T. (2006). Developments in container port competition in East Asia. Transport Reviews, 26(2), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yeo, G. T. (2007). Port Competitiveness in North East Asia: An Integrated Fuzzy Approach to Expert Evaluations (PhD thesis). Plymouth University, UK.Google Scholar
  46. Yeo, G. T., Roe, M., & Dinwoodie, J. (2008). Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China. Transportation Research Part A, 42(6), 910–921.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LogisticsBeijing WuZi UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of ManagementPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations