Advertisement

From Roma to Squatters: Ambiguity and Urban Solidarity During the Economic Crisis

  • Gaja Maestri
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

This chapter looks at the recent developments in political contention around the Italian Roma camps in Rome. In the last years, an increasing number of Roma have joined political squats set up by urban squatting movements. The chapter introduces ‘Roma squatting’ as a new repertoire of action that emerged in the aftermath of the 2007–2008 economic crisis, which bypasses the ethnicisation of Roma claims through a new alliance with other marginalised categories. It then illustrates how the ambiguity of the Roma policy categorisation has opened up new opportunities, allowing the Roma, who present themselves as squatters, to escape segregation in Roma camps. The third part of the chapter unpacks the process of becoming Roma-squatters: it considers four housing squats that include Roma groups, two of which were evicted while other two are still open. While the book broadly tackles the question of camp persistence, the last section of this chapter examines the spatial and discursive factors that contribute to the enduring of these new spaces of solidarity.

Bibliography

  1. Aguilera, Thomas. 2017. “Racialization of Informal Settlements, Depoliticization of Squatting and Everyday Resistances in French Slums.” In Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy, edited by Pierpaolo Mudu and Sutapa Chattopadhyay. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alunni, Lorenzo. 2015. “Securitarian Healing: Roma Mobility and Health Care in Rome.” Medical Anthropology 34 (2): 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amnesty International. 2013. Double Standards: Italy’s Housing Policies Discriminate Against Roma. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
  4. Aradau, Claudia, Jef Huysmans, P. G. Macioti, and Vicki Squire. 2010. “Paradoxes of Citizenship: The Roma, Mobility and Europe.” Enacting European Citizenship (ENACT), European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (Grant Agreement No. 217504).Google Scholar
  5. Belloni, Milena. 2016. “Learning How to Squat: Cooperation and Conflict Between Refugees and Natives in Rome.” Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (4): 506–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benford, Robert D., and David A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and an Assessment.” Annua Review of Sociology 26: 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berenice, Compare, Lunaria, and OsservAzione. 2013. “Segregare costa. La spesa per i ‘campi nomadi’ a Napoli, Roma e Milano.” I diritti non sono un costo. Roma.Google Scholar
  8. Blokland, Talja, Christine Hentschel, Andrej Holm, Henrik Lebuhn, and Talia Margalit. 2015. “Urban Citizenship and Right to the City: The Fragmentation of Claims.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (4): 655–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boschetti, Laura, and Tommaso Vitale. 2011. “Les Roms ne sont pas encore prêts à se représenter eux-mêmes! Asymétries et tensions entre groupes Roms et associations ‘gadjé’ à Milan.” Du civil au politique. Ethnographies du vivre-ensemble, 403–29.Google Scholar
  10. Bouillon, Florence. 2009. Les mondes du squat. Anthropologie d’un habitat précaire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  11. Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. De Moor, Joost. 2016. “Practicing Openness: Investigating the Role of Everyday Decision Making in the Production of Squatted Space.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 40 (2): 410–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Della Porta, Donatella, and Alice Mattoni, eds. 2014. Spreading Protest: Social Movements in Times of Crisis. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  14. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2012. The Situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States: Survey Results at a Glance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  15. Grazioli, Margherita. 2017. “From Citizens to Citadins? Rethinking Right to the City Inside Housing Squats in Rome, Italy.” Citizenship Studies 21 (4): 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harvey, David. 2003. “The Right to the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (4): 939–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 2nd rev. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. MacLeod, Gordon, and Colin McFarlane. 2014. “Introduction: Grammars of Urban Injustice.” Antipode 46 (4): 857–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maestri, Gaja. 2014. “The Economic Crisis as Opportunity: How Austerity Generates New Strategies and Solidarities for Negotiating Roma Access to Housing in Rome.” City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 18 (6): 808–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2016. “From Nomads to Squatters: Towards a Deterritorialisation of Roma Exceptionalism Through Assemblage Thinking.” In Re-thinking Life at the Margins: Assemblage, Subjects and Spaces, edited by Michele Lancione, 122–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2017a. “Extensive Territorial Stigma and Ways of Coping with It: The Stigmatisation of the Roma in Italy and France.” In Negative Neighbourhood Reputation and Place Attachment, edited by Paul Kirkness and Andreas Tijé-Dra, 42–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2017b. “Struggles and Ambiguities Over Political Subjectivities in the Camp: Roma Camp Dwellers Between Neoliberal and Urban Citizenship in Italy.” Citizenship Studies 21 (6): 640–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Makrygianni, Vasiliki. 2017. “Migrant Squatters in the Greek Territory: Practices of Resistance and the Production of the Athenian Urban Space.” In Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy, edited by Pierpaolo Mudu and Sutapa Chattopadhyay. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Martínez, Miguel A. 2012. “The Squatters’ Movement in Europe: A Durable Struggle for Social Autonomy in Urban Politics.” Antipode 45 (4): 866–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2017. “Beyond Solidarity: Migrants and Squatters in Madrid.” In Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy, edited by Pierpaolo Mudu and Sutapa Chattopadhyay. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. McAdam, Dough, Sidney Tarrow, and Charles Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. McFarlane, Colin, and Jonathan Silver. 2017. “The Poolitical City: ‘Seeing Sanitation’ and Making the Urban Political in Cape Town.” Antipode 49 (1): 125–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, Byron, and Walter Nicholls. 2013. “Social Movements in Urban Society: The City as a Space of Politicization.” Urban Geography 34 (4): 452–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudu, Pierpaolo. 2004. “Resisting and Challenging Neoliberalism: The Development of Italian Social Centers.” Antipode 36: 917–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mudu, Pierpaolo, and Sutapa Chattopadhyay, eds. 2017. Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Nicholls, Walter. 2007. “The Geographies of Social Movements.” Geography Compass 1 (3): 607–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nur, Nadia, and Alejandro Sethman. 2017. “Migration and Mobilization for the Right to Housing in Rome: New Urban Frontiers?” In Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy, edited by Pierpaolo Mudu and Sutapa Chattopadhyay. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Péchu, Cécile. 2010. Les squats. Paris: Presse de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  34. Piazza, Gianni. 2016. “Squatting Social Centres in a Sicilian City: Liberated Spaces and Urban Protest Actors.” Antipode.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2017. “Palazzo Bernini: An Experience of a Multicultural Squatted House in Catania.” In Migration, Squatting and Radical Autonomy, edited by Pierpaolo Mudu and Sutapa Chattopadhyay. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Pruijt, Hans. 2013a. “Squatting in Europe.” In Squatting in Europe: Radical Spaces, Urban Struggles, edited by Squatting Europe Kollective. Wivenhoe, New York and Port Watson: Minor Composition.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2013b. “The Logic of Urban Squatting.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (1): 19–45.Google Scholar
  38. Rancière, Jacques. 2001. “Ten Theses on Politics.” Theory and Event 5 (3).  https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2001.0028.
  39. Rolnik, Raquel. 2013. “Late Neoliberalism: The Financialization of Homeownership and Housing Rights.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (3): 1058–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenberger, Sieglinde, and Jakob Winkler. 2014. “Com/Passionate Protests: Fighting the Deportation of Asylum Seekers.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19 (2): 489–510.Google Scholar
  41. Rossi, Monica. 2006. “Rom a Roma. Pratiche di integrazione e controllo: il campo di via Casilina 700.” In La periferia perfetta. Migrazioni, istituzioni e relazioni etniche nell’area metropolitana romana, edited by Simone Misiani, Pier Paolo Mudu, Daria Pessina, Monica Rossi, and Eugenio Sonnino, 221–43. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
  42. Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tremlett, Annabel. 2009. “Bringing Hybridity to Heterogeneity in Romani Studies.” Romani Studies 19 (2): 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uitermark, Justus, and Walter Nicholls. 2014. “From Politicization to Policing: The Rise and Decline of New Social Movements in Amsterdam and Paris.” Antipode 46 (4): 970–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vermeersch, Peter. 2012. “Reframing the Roma: EU Initiatives and the Politics of Reinterpretation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (8): 1195–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zamponi, Lorenzo. 2012. “‘Why Don’t Italians Occupy?’ Hypotheses on a Failed Mobilisation.” Social Movement Studies 11 (3–4): 416–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Media, Communication and SociologyUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations