Advertisement

A Conceptual Architecture for Stewarding Sustainability Transformations

  • Petra Kuenkel
Chapter

Abstract

This Chapter takes the emerging conceptual architecture for stewarding sustainability transformations to the next level. It suggests that collaboration literacy enhances transformation literacy, which is defined as the capability to steward sustainability transformations collectively, across the boundaries of institutions, nations, sectors, and cultures. The chapter proposes four shifts in thinking toward a new way of approaching large-system change that consider the Patterns of Aliveness Theory with its six aliveness-enhancing principles. It summarizes the insights from 50 semi-structured research interviews with scholars and practitioners in the global sustainability arena and links these insights to the currently most discussed intervention approaches to sustainability transformations. The integration with the aliveness principles and the dimensions of the Collective Leadership Compass leads to the final level of the conceptual architecture for stewarding sustainability transformations. How this can be applied to enhance systems aliveness is illustrated by an example from the circular economy approach.

Keywords

Transformation literacy Collaboration literacy Stewardship of sustainability transformations Circular economy Collective leadership compass Systems aliveness Patterns of aliveness theory Multi-stakeholder collaboration SDG implementation Transformative change Large-system change 

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2010). Animal spirits: How human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, J. (2006). The use of consumption taxes to re-launch green tax reforms. International Review of Law and Economics, 26(1), 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, C. (2002). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book I – The phenomenon of life. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, C. (2005). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book III – A vision of a living world. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.Google Scholar
  6. Alexander, C. (2004). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book IV – The luminous ground. Berkeley: The Center for Environmental Structure.Google Scholar
  7. Anders, S. M., & Caswell, J. A. (2009). Standards as barriers versus standards as catalysts: Assessing the impact of HACCP implementation on US seafood imports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. Houghton: Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  10. Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & McConney, P. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Astleithner, F., & Hamedinger, A. (2003). The analysis of sustainability indicators as socially constructed policy instruments: Benefits and challenges of ‘interactive research’. Local Environment, 8(6), 627–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., O’Riordan, T., Haxeltine, A., Weaver, P., Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2014). Gamechangers and transformative social innovation. The case of the economic crisis and tranformative social innovation. TRANSIT Working Paper, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.Google Scholar
  13. Bäck, M. A., & Levay, C. (2015). Alternative insights on health and social management: tackling and solving the wicked problems. Is there an alternative? In Management after critique. Conference proceedings of the Critical Management Studies. 9th International Conference, 7–10 July, Leicester, England. Retrieved from https://iris.unito.it/retrieve/handle/2318/1558382/53038/conf%20abstracts.pdf#page=5
  14. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bason, C. (2011). Leading public sector innovation. Bristol: Public Policy Press.Google Scholar
  16. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the anthropocene. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Biermann, F., Man-san Chan, A. M., & Pattberg, P. (2007). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Does the promise hold? In P. Glasbergen, F. Biermann, & A. Mol (Eds.), Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Blackett, A. (2001). Global governance, legal pluralism and the decentered state: A labor law critique of codes of corporate conduct. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 8, 401–447.Google Scholar
  20. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The wealth of the commons: A world beyond market and state. Amherst: Levellers Press.Google Scholar
  21. Boone, C., & Hendricks, W. (2009). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity. Management Science, 55(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Boström, M., Jönsson, A. M., Lockie, S., Mol, A. P., & Oosterveer, P. (2015). Sustainable and responsible supply chain governance: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brest, P. (2010). The power of theories of change. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(2), 47–51.Google Scholar
  24. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  25. Burke, S. C., Wilson, K. A., & Salas, E. (2005). The use of a team-based strategy for organizational transformation: Guidance for moving toward a high reliability organization. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6(6), 509–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Burns, D. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Rugby: Practical Action.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bush, S. R., Oosterveer, P., Bailey, M., & Mol, A. (2014). Sustainability governance of chains and networks: A review and future outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 8–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chabay, I., Frick, M., & Helgeson, J. (Eds.). (2016). Land restoration: Reclaiming landscapes for a sustainable future. Waltham: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Chan, E. A., Cheung, K., Mok, E., Cheung, S., & Tong, E. (2006). A narrative inquiry into the Hong Kong Chinese adults’ concepts of health through their cultural stories. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Constanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Development: Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 505(7483), 283–285.  https://doi.org/10.1038/505283a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cornell, S. (2012). On the system properties of the planetary boundaries. Ecology and Society, 17(1), r2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Crowards, T. M. (1998). Safe minimum standards. Costs and opportunities. Ecological Economics, 25(3), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind: The anthropocene. Nature, 415(6867), 23–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Czarniawska, B. (2004). Narratives in social science. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Czarniawska, B., & Gagliari, P. (2003). Narratives we organize by. Philadelphis: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  36. Daily, G. (Ed.). (1997). Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  37. Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1992). Population, sustainability, and earth‘s carrying capacity. Bioscience, 42(10), 761–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. De Liefde, H. J. W. (2003). Lekgotla, the art of leadership through dialogue. Houghton: Jacana.Google Scholar
  39. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Dombrowski, K. (2010). Filling the gap? An analysis of non-governmental organizations responses to participation and representation deficits in global climate governance. International environmental agreements: politics, law and economics, 10(4), 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Dooley, K. J. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1(1), 69–97.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022375910940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Doz, Y., Hellström, E., Kosonen, M., Lähdemäki, J., & Wilson, K. (2017). Reflections on the “leadership under complexity” workshop, SITRA working papers. Finland: The Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra.Google Scholar
  43. Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Dürr, H. P., Dahm, D., & zur Lippe, R. (2005). Potsdam Manifesto 2005. We have to learn to think in a new way, Federation of German Scientists – Vereinigung Deutscher Wissenschaftler VDW e.V. München.Google Scholar
  45. Dutilleul, B., Birrer, A. J., & Mensink, W. (2010). Unpacking European living labs: Analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), 60–85.Google Scholar
  46. Ernstson, H., Leeuw, S. E. V. D., Redman, C. L., Meffert, D. J., Davis, G., Alfsen, C., & Elmqvist, T. (2010). Urban transitions: On urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 39(8), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Feola, G. (2015). Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 44(5), 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ferenschild, S. (2002). The OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises – an insufficient step towards realization of social standards. Responsible globalization? The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprise. Discussion Paper, Berlin: German Watch. Accessed at http://www.germanwatch.org/download/tw/oecd-e.pdf
  49. Finidori, H (2016). Patterns that connect: Potential of pattern/languages for sustainable futures – Model Report: Systems Thinking, Modeling and Simulation News. Retrieved from https://model.report/s/mjmowj/patterns_that_connect_potential_of_pattern_languages_for_sustainable_futures_-_finidori
  50. Finidori, H. (2015). Purplsoc Conference 2015 Plast (Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation): A fourth generation pattern language, Free Knowledge Institute. Retrieved from http://www.purplsoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/45_PLAST_A-Fourth-Generation-Pattern-Language.pdf
  51. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Franz, H. W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: And introduction. In H. W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, & J. Howaldt (Eds.), Challenge social innovation, potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Havinga, T. (2011). Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multi-stakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(3), 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fullerton, J. (2015). Regenerative capitalism: How universal principles and patterns will shape our new economy. Capital Institute: Future of Finance Publication [online publication]. Retrieved from http://capitalinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-Regenerative-Capitalism-4-20-15-final.pdf
  56. Gadinger, F., Jarzebski, S., & Yildiz, T. (2014). Politische Narrative. Konturen einer politikwissenschaftlichen Erzähltheorie. In F. Gadinger, S. Jarzebski, & T. Yildiz (Eds.), Politische Narrative: Konzepte, Analysen – Forschungspraxis (pp. 3–38). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  57. Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Goepel, M. (2016). The great mindshift. How a new economic paradigm and sustainability transformations go hand in hand. New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Gonzalez-Gaudiano, E., & Meira-Cartea, P. (2009). Climate change education and communication: A critical perspective on obstacles and resistances. In D. Selby & F. Kagawa (Eds.), Education and climate change. Living and learning in interesting times (pp. 13–34). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience, 50, 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Guth, W. D., & MacMillan, I. C. (1986). Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hanjra, M. A., & Qureshi, M. E. (2010). Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy, 35(5), 365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  65. Hayward, R., Lee, J., Keeble, J., McNamara, R., Hall, C., Cruse, S., & Robinson, E. (2013). The UN global compact-accenture CEO study on sustainability 2013. UN Global Compact Reports, 5(3), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hellström, E., & Kosonen, M. (2016). Governing the welfare state and beyond: Solutions for a complex world and uncertain future. Sitra Studies, 107.Google Scholar
  67. Henderson, H. (1995). Paradigms in progress. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  68. Henderson, H. (1997). Building a win-win world: Life beyond global economic warfare. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler.Google Scholar
  69. Henderson, R., Locke, R. M., Liddy, C., & Reavis, C. (2009). Nike considered: Getting traction on sustainability. In MIS Sloan Management School of Management Paper # 08–077. Cambridge: MIT Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
  70. Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Higman, S. (2013). The sustainable forestry handbook: A practical guide for tropical forest managers on implementing new standards. Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  72. Hilborn, R. C. (2000). Chaos and nonlinear dynamics: An introduction for scientists and engineers. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Hinrichs, K., & Kangas, O. (2003). When is a change big enough to be a system shift? Small system-shifting changes in German and Finnish pension policies. Social Policy, & Administration, 37(6), 573–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. von Hippel, E. (2010). Comment on ‘Is open innovation a field of study or a communication barrier to theory development?’. Technovation, 30(11–12), 555–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hulme, M. (2008). The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal, 174(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. IDEO (2008). Design thinking. In Harvard Business Review [Online]. Available from: http://www.ideo.com/by-ideo/design-thinking-in-harvard-business-review
  77. IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014. Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  78. Ison, R. L. (2014). What is systemic about innovation systems? The implications for policies, governance and institutionalisation. In J. Francis & A. van Huis (Eds.), Innovation systems: Towards effective strategies in support of smallholder farmers. Wageningen: CTA/WUR.Google Scholar
  79. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  80. Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8–21.Google Scholar
  81. Kjaer, A. M. (2004). Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  82. Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SME: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Korten, D. C. (2007). The great turning: From empire to earth community. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  84. Korten, D. C. (2015). Change the story, change the future: A living economy for a living earth. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  85. KPMG International, De Boer, Y., & van Bergen, B. (2012). Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. Amsterdam: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  86. Kraemer, R. A., Carin, B., Gruenig, M., Blumenschein, F. N., Flores, R., Mathur, A., & Vaughan, S. (2017). Green shift to sustainability: Co-benefits and impacts of energy transformation on resource industries, trade, growth, and taxes. G20 Insights. Retrieved from: http://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/G20_T20Insight_Resources_170424.pdf
  87. Kuenkel, P. (2008). Mind and heart: Mapping your personal journey towards leadership for sustainability. Potsdam: Collective Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  88. Kuenkel, P. (2016). The art of leading collectively: How we can co-create a sustainable, socially just future. Claremont: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  89. Kuenkel, P. (2017). A pattern approach to sustainability transformation – How the 17 SDG can become a starting point for systemic change, Collective leadership studies Vol. 5; Collective Leadership Institute: Potsdam/Germany. ISSN 2569–1171.Google Scholar
  90. Kuenkel, P., Fricke, V., & Cholakova, S. (2009). The common code for the coffee community. In D. Volmer (Ed.), Enhancing the effectiveness of sustainability partnerships. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  91. Kuenkel, P. & Schaefer, K. (2013). Shifting the way we co-create: How we can turn the challenges of sustainability into opportunities. Collective Leadership Studies No 1. Potsdam, Germany: The Collective Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  92. Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Brussels: Nelson Parker.Google Scholar
  93. Leading4Wellbeing (2017). Meadows memorandum: A new economic model for a finer future. Retrieved from http://leading4wellbeing.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Meadows-Memorandum-with-Cover-V8.1.pdf
  94. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A. G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Levett, R. (1998). Sustainability indicators: Integrating quality of life and environmental protection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 161(3), 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Lewin, K. (1963). Feldtheorie in den Sozialwissenschaften. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  97. Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  98. Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D., & Schreiber, C. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. In E. J. K. Hazy, J. A. Goldstein, & B. B. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory: New perspectives from complexity science and organizational effectiveness (pp. 129–144). Mansfield: ISCE Publushing.Google Scholar
  99. Lobel, O. (2007). The paradox of extralegal activism: Critical legal consciousness and transformative politics. Harvard Law Review, 120, 937–988.Google Scholar
  100. Lodge, M. (2007). Comparing non-hierarchical governance in action: The open method of co-ordination in pensions and information society. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(2), 343–365.Google Scholar
  101. Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. Doctoral Dissertation. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  102. Loorbach, D., Avelino, F., Haxeltine, A., Wittmayer, J., O'Riordan, T., Weaver, P., & Kemp, R. (2016). The economic crisis as a game changer? Exploring the role of social construction in sustainability transitions. Ecology and Society, 21(4), 15.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08761-210415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1991). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (Vol. 42). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  104. Meadows, D. (1994). Envisioning a sustainable world. In R. Constanza, O. Segura, & J. Martinez-Alier (Eds.), Getting down to earth: Practical applications of ecologial economics (pp. 117–126). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  105. Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene into a system. Hartland: Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  106. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Earth Island Limited.Google Scholar
  107. Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: The 30-year update. White River Junction: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  108. Mizobuchi, H. (2004). Measuring world better life frontier: A composite indicator for OECD better life index. Social Indicators Research, 118, 987.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0457-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Moldan, B., Janouskova, S., & Hak, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Niestroy, I., & Meuleman, L. (2015). Common but differentiated governance: Making the SDGs work. Sustainability, 7(9), 12295–12321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. O'Malley, R., Cavender-Bares, K., & Clark, W. C. (2003). “Better” data: Not as simple as it might seem. Environment, 45(1), 8–18.Google Scholar
  112. OECD (2015). System innovation. Synthesis report. Retrieved from https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/general/SYSTEMINNOVATION_FINALREPORT.pdf. (June 30, 2017).
  113. Pask, G. (1992). Different kinds of cybernetics. In G. Van de Vijver (Ed.), New perspectives on cybernetics (pp. 11–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Pauli, G. A. (2010). The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Brookline: Paradigm Publications.Google Scholar
  115. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2011). Developing responsible global leaders through international service-learning programs: The Ulysses experience. Academy of Management Learning, & Education, 10(2), 237–260.Google Scholar
  116. Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  117. Ponte, S., & Cheyns, E. (2013). Voluntary standards, expert knowledge and the governance of sustainability networks. Global Networks, 13(4), 459–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  119. Prádanos, L. I. (2016). The pedagogy of degrowth: Teaching Hispanic studies in the age of social inequality and ecological collapse. Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies, 19(1), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rickels, W., Dovern, J., Hoffmann, J., Quaas, M. F., Schmidt, J. O., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Indicators for monitoring sustainable development goals: An application to oceanic development in the European Union. Earth’s Future, 4(5), 252–267.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E., & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sahtouris, E., & Lovelock, J. E. (2000). Earthdance: Living systems in evolution. San Jose: iUniverse.Google Scholar
  125. Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-System to ecosystem economies. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  126. Schneidewind, U. (2013). Transformative literacy: Understanding and shaping societal transformations. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(2), 82–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical, and statistical analysis of the capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  128. Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015). The dawn of system leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13, 27–33.Google Scholar
  129. SITRA (2016). Leading the cycle Finnish road map to a circular economy 2016–2025. Finland: The Finnish Innovation Fund, Sitra Studie 121. Retrieved from: https://media.sitra.fi/2017/02/28142644/Selvityksia121.pdf
  130. Snowden, D. (2015). Propensities and dispositions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.Google Scholar
  132. von Stamm, B. (2008). Managing innovation design and creativity (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  133. von Stamm, B., & Trifilova, A. (2009). The future of innovation. Surrey: Cower Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  134. Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015a). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., & Sörlin, S. (2015b). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855–1259855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Stern, N. (2015). Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  137. Sternin, J., & Choo, R. (2000). The power of positive deviance. Harvard Business Review, 73(1), 14–15.Google Scholar
  138. Stieglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: The Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress Retrieved from http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/index.htm.Google Scholar
  139. Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Taplin, D. H., Clark, H., Collins, E., & Colby, D. C. (2013). Theory of change technical papers: A series of papers to support development of theories of change based on practice in the field. New York: ActKnowledge and the Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
  141. Termeer, C. J., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G., & Stiller, S. J. (2013). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration, & Society, 47(6), 680–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. UNEP. (2012). GEO5 global environmental outlook 5: Environment for the future we want. Valletta: Progress Press.Google Scholar
  143. Vázquez, P., Jesús, A., Cedano, K. G., Martínez, M., & Jensen, H. J. (2015). An entangled model for sustainability indicators. PLoS One, 10(8), e0135250 [online publication].  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Vermaak, H. (2011). Nobody has all the answers, but collectively we can find them using causal loop diagrams to deal with ambiguity. In A. F. Buono, L. de Caluwé, & A. Stoppelenburg (Eds.) Exploring the professional identity of management consultants. Conference proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Management Consulting, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://hansvermaak.com/wpcontent/uploads/hans-vermaak-causal-loop-diagrams-ambiguity.pdf
  145. Vörösmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., & Lammers, R. B. (2000). Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289(5477), 284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Waddell, S. (2011). Global action networks: Creating our future together. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Waddell, S. (2016). Change for the audacious: A doers' guide to large systems change for a flourishing future. Boston: NetworkingAction.Google Scholar
  148. Waddell, S., Waddock, S., Cornell, S., Dentoni, D., McLachlan, M., & Meszoely, G. (2015). Large systems change: An emerging field of transformation and transitions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. WBGU (2011a). World in transition: A social contract for sustainability. Flagship Report. Berlin, Germany: WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change).Google Scholar
  150. WBGU (2011b). The transformation towards sustainability. Factsheet 4/2011. Berlin: WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change). Retrieved from http://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/factsheets/fs2011-fs4/wbgu_fs4_2011_en.pdf
  151. WBGU (2016). Entwicklung und Gerechtigkeit durch Transformation: Die vier großen I. Sondergutachten. Berlin, Germany: WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change).Google Scholar
  152. Weber, A. (2013). Enlivenment. Towards a fundamental shift in the concepts of nature, culture and politics. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  153. Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. The Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
  154. Westley, F., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Homer-Dixon, T., Vredenburg, H., Loorbach, D., Thompson, J., Nilsson, M., Lambin, E., Senzimir, J., Banerjee, B., Galaz, V., & van der Leeuw, S. (2011). Tipping toward sustainability: Emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio, 40(7), 762–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Wright, C., & Rwabizambuga, A. (2006). Institutional pressures, corporate reputation, and voluntary codes of conduct: An examination of the equator principles. Business and Society Review, 111(1), 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Kuenkel
    • 1
  1. 1.Full Member of the Club of RomeCollective Leadership InstitutePotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations