Advertisement

Introduction and Context: The State of the World

  • Petra Kuenkel
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the 17 Sustainable Development Goals for the United Nations Agenda 2030 “Transforming Our World” as the background for exploring the notion of stewardship of sustainability transformations. It describes the world’s sustainability challenges, which range from climate change to ecosystem decline and from energy insecurity to water scarcity, as systemic in nature. The chapter subsequently suggests that the interdependence of the challenges requires a new approach to implementing the Agenda 2030. It emphasizes that a systems view of life could potentially incorporate shifts in perspective from the parts to the whole, from silo thinking to networked collective action, and from fixation on economic growth rates to revisiting the purpose of measurements. This leads to a chapter overview that summarizes the flow of the books argument toward an emerging theory and practice of sustainability transformations.

Keywords

Sustainable development goals SDG implementation Sustainability challenges Agenda 2030 Stewardship Systems view of life Sustainability transformations Collective leadership Climate change Anthropocene Flourishing world 

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1998). A systemic view of transformational leadership. Systematic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C. (2004). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book IV – The Luminous Ground. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, K. E., Stelzner, S. P., & Wielkiewicz, R. W. (1999). The ecology of leadership: Adapting to the challenges of a changing world. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 5(2), 62–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199900500207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done. London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, J., & Bartunek, J. (2003). Theories and practices of organization development. In W. Borman, D. Ilgen, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 309–332). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., O’Riordan, T., Haxeltine, A., Weaver, P., Kemp, R., Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2014). Gamechangers and transformative social innovation. The case of the economic crisis and tranformative social innovation. TRANSIT Working Paper, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.Google Scholar
  7. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bai, X., van der Leeuw, S., O’Brien, K., Berkhout, F., Biermann, F., Brondizio, E. S., & Revkin, A. (2016). Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barbour, I. G. (1999). Neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and human nature: Theological and philosophical reflections. Zygon, 34(3), 361–398.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0591-2385.00222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beinhocker, E. D. (2007). The origin of wealth: Evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. London: Random House Business.Google Scholar
  11. Bernstein, M., & Linsky, M. (2016). Leading change through adaptive design, Stanford Social Innovation review, Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/leading_change_through_adaptive_design
  12. Berry, T. (1988). The dream of the Earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  13. Biesta, G. J., & Mirón, L. F. (2002). The new discourses on educational leadership: An introduction. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(2), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Black, R., Bennett, S. R. G., Thomas, S. M., & Beddington, J. R. (2011). Climate change: Migration as adaptation. Nature, 478(7370), 447–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bøås, M., & McNeill, D. (Eds.). (2004). Global institutions and development: Framing the world? London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, L. R. (2011). World on edge: How to prevent environmental and economic collapse. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  18. Burns, D. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Rugby: Practical Action.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burns, H., Diamond-Vaught, H., & Bauman, C. (2015). Leadership for sustainability: Theoretical foundations and pedagogical practices that foster change. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(1), 131–143.Google Scholar
  20. Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). Contemporary worldviews: Personal and policy implications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(3), 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Camacho, L. (2015). Sustainable development goals: Kinds, connections and expectations. Journal of Global Ethics, 11(1), 18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2015.1010097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  23. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The system’s view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00068-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2000). Systemic leadership: Ethical and effective. Leadership, & Organization Development Journal, 21(4), 207–215.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730010335454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Constanza, R., & Kubiszewski, I. (Eds.). (2014). Creating a sustainable and desirable future: Insights from 45 global thought leaders. New York: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  27. Donaldson, T. (2012). The epistemic fault line in corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 256–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dooley, K. J. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1(1), 69–97.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022375910940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferdig, M. A. (2007). Sustainability leadership: Co-creating a sustainable future. Journal of Change Management, 7(1), 25–35.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010701233809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finidori, H. (2015). Purplsoc Conference 2015 Plast (Pattern Languages for Systemic Transformation): A fourth generation pattern language, Free Knowledge Institute, Retrieved from http://www.purplsoc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/45_PLAST_A-Fourth-Generation-Pattern-Language.pdf
  31. Finidori, H. (2016). Patterns that connect: Potential of pattern/languages for sustainable futures – Model Report: Systems Thinking, Modeling and Simulation News. Retrieved from https://model.report/s/mjmowj/patterns_that_connect_potential_of_pattern_languages_for_sustainable_futures_-_finidori
  32. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics: How the economy and institutions affect wellbeing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). A framework for understanding collective leadership: The selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(6), 933–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Friedrich, J., Fetzer, I., & Cornell, S. (2016). Modelling for planetary boundaries: a network analysis of representations of complex human-environmental interactions in integrated global models. In EGU general assembly conference abstracts. Vol. 18, p. 18394–18349.Google Scholar
  36. Fullerton, J. (2015). Regenerative capitalism: How universal principles and patterns will shape our new economy. Capital Institute: Future of Finance Publication [online publication]. Retrieved from http://capitalinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-Regenerative-Capitalism-4-20-15-final.pdf
  37. Future Earth. (2013). Future Earth initial design: Report of the transition team. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar
  38. Future Earth. (2014). Strategic research agenda 2014. Priorities for a global sustainability research strategy. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar
  39. Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, J. I., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Goepel, M. (2016). The great mindshift. How a new economic paradigm and sustainability transformations go hand in hand. New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Gray, L. C., & Moseley, W. G. (2005). A geographical perspective on poverty–environment interactions. The Geographical Journal, 171(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Greenleaf, R. K. (1998). The power of servant leadership. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451.Google Scholar
  46. Hajiran, H. (2006). Toward a quality of life theory: Net domestic product of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 75, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  48. Hausschildt, J., & Kirchmann, E. (2001). Teamwork for innovation: The troika of promoters. R&D Management, 31(1), 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hay, I. (Ed.). (2013). Geographies of the super-rich. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  50. HayGroup. (2014). Leadership 2030: Building the New Leader. Retrieved from http://www.haygroup.com/downloads/MicroSites/L2030/Hay_Group_Leadership_2030%20w hitepaper_2014.pdf
  51. Hayward, R., Lee, J., Keeble, J., McNamara, R., Hall, C., Cruse, S., …, & Robinson, E. (2013). The UN global compact-Accenture CEO study on sustainability. UN Global Compact Reports, 5(3), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hotes, R. W. (2011). Organization development in the 21st century: an organizational behavior, organization development and process consultation guide. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse Inc, Bloomington Publisher.Google Scholar
  53. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
  55. Jaworski, J. (1996). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  56. Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.Google Scholar
  57. Kaul, I. (2013). Global public goods: a concept for framing the post-2015 agenda? (Discussion Paper). Retrieved from German Development Institute website: http://www.die-gdi.de/CMS-Homepage/openwebcms3.nsf/%28ynDK_contentByKey%29/ANES-959D4N/$FILE/DP%202.2013.pdf
  58. Korten, D. C. (2015). Change the story, change the future: A living economy for a living earth. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. KPMG International, De Boer, Y., & van Bergen, B. (2012). Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. Amsterdam: KPMG International.Google Scholar
  60. Kritz, M. (1987). International migration policies: Conceptual problems. International Migration Review, 21(4), 947–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kuenkel, P. (2008). Mind and heart: Mapping your personal journey towards leadership for sustainability. Potsdam: Collective Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  62. Kuenkel, P. (2015). Navigating change in complex multi-actor settings: A practice approach to better collaboration. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kuenkel, P. (2016). The art of leading collectively: How we can co-create a sustainable, socially just future. Claremont, NH: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  64. Kuenkel, P., & Schaefer, K. (2013). Shifting the way we co-create: How we can turn the challenges of sustainability into opportunities, Collective Leadership Studies No 1. Potsdam: The Collective Leadership Institute.Google Scholar
  65. Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice (pathways to sustainability). Washington, DC: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lichtenstein, B. B., Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., Seers, A., Orton, J. D., & Schreiber, C. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: An interactive perspective on leading in complex adaptive systems. In E. J. K. Hazy, J. A. Goldstein, & B. B. Lichtenstein (Eds.), Complex systems leadership theory: New perspectives from complexity science and organizational effectiveness (pp. 129–144). Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. Liening, A. (2013). The breakdown of the traditional mechanistic worldview, the development of complexity sciences and the pretence of knowledge in economics. Modern Economy, 4, 305–319.  https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2013.44034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lovins, H. A. (2012). The way out: Kick-starting capitalism to save our economic ass. In H. Lovins & B. Cohen (Eds.), The way out: Kick-starting capitalism to save our economic ass. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  70. Low, K. C. P. (2011). Confucius, the value of benevolence and what’s in it for humanity? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1960366). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1960366
  71. Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2009). Business leaders as citizens of the world. Advancing humanism on a global scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 537–550.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0122-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Marion, R., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leadership in complex organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(4), 389–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00092-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: Roots of human understanding. London: New Science Library.Google Scholar
  74. Meadows, D. (1994). Envisioning a sustainable world. In R. Constanza, O. Segura, & J. Martinez-Alier (Eds.), Getting down to Earth: Practical applications of ecological economics (pp. 117–126). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  75. Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene into a system. Hartland, VT: Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  76. Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. London: Earth Island Limited.Google Scholar
  77. Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to growth: the 30-year update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
  78. Nucci, L. P., & Narvaez, D. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of moral and character education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  79. O’Connor, D., & Yballe, L. (2007). Maslow revisited: Constructing a road map of human nature. Journal of Management Education, 31(6), 738–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. OECD. (2015). System innovation. Synthesis report. Retrieved from 30, June 2017 https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/general/SYSTEMINNOVATION_FINALREPORT.pdf
  81. Ospina, S., Foldy, W., Hadidy, E. I., Dodge, J., Hofmann-Pinilla, A., & Su, C. (2012). Social change leadership as relational leadership. In M. Uhl-Bien & S. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives, Leadership Horizons Series. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  82. Patscheke, S., Barmettler, A., Herman, L., Overdyke, S., & Pfitzer, M. (2014). Shaping global partnerships for a post 2015 world. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
  83. Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2014). Transnational multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development. Building blocks for success. IVM Report, R-14/31. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  84. Pattberg, P., Biermann, F., Chan, S., & Mert, A. (Eds.). (2012). Public-private partnerships for sustainable development. Emergence, influence and legitimacy. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  85. Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2005). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. In M. Seppä, M. Hannula, A. M. Järvelin, J. Kujala, M. Ruohonen, & T. Tiainen (Eds.), Frontiers of e-Business Research 2004, Conference proceedings of eBRF (Vol. 2004, pp. 267–281). Tampere: Tampere University of Technology and University of Tampere.Google Scholar
  86. Pirson, M. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as the paragons of shared value creation? A critical perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 8(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pirson, M., & Lawrence, P. (2015). Economistic and humanistic narratives of leadership in the age of globality: Toward a renewed Darwinian theory of leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Pór, G. (2008). Collective intelligence and collective leadership: twin paths to beyond chaos. A PrimaVera working paper, Universiteit van Amsterdam, All Sprouts Content. Retrieved from http://sprouts.aisnet.org/8-2/
  89. Probst, G. J. B., & Bassi, A. (2014). Tackling complexity: A systemic approach for decision makers. Sheffield: Green Leaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  90. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E., & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: A systemic and reflexive approach. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change (pp. 105–222). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  92. Sahtouris, E., & Lovelock, J. E. (2000). Earthdance: Living systems in evolution. San Jose, CA: iUniverse.Google Scholar
  93. Scharmer, O., & Kaufer, K. (2013). Leading from the emerging future: From ego-system to ecosystem economies. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  94. Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015). The dawn of system leadership (Vol. 13, pp. 27–33). Stanford Social Innovation Review.Google Scholar
  95. Snowden, D. (2015). Propensities and dispositions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.Google Scholar
  97. Stacey, R. D. (1995). The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 477–495.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C. P., Barnosky, A. D., Cornell, S. E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J. F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S. J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2018). Trajectories of the earth system in the anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Svensson, G., & Wood, G. (2006). Sustainable components of leadership effectiveness in organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 25(6), 522–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Timmer, D., Creech, H., & Buckler, C. (2008). Supporting the next generation of sustainability leadership. International Institute for Sustainable Development: Winnipeg. Retrieved from: www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/support_next_gen_leaders.pdf
  101. TWI2050 – The World in 2050. (2018). Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Report prepared by The World in 2050 initiative. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria. www.twi2050.org
  102. United Nations. (2014a). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/sg/management/pdf/HLP_P2015_Report.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2017.
  103. United Nations. (2014b). The road to dignity by 2030: Ending poverty, transforming all lives and protecting the planet. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/reports/SG_Synthesis_Report_Road_to_Dignity_by_2030.pdf. Accessed June 23, 2017.
  104. Van Tulder, R., & Pfisterer, S. (2013). Creating partnership space: Exploring the right fit for sustainable development partnerships. In M. M. Seitanidi & A. Crane (Eds.), Social partnerships and responsible business. A research handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Waddell, S. (2003). Global action networks. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 3(12), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Waddell, S. (2011). Global action networks: Creating our future together. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Waddell, S., Waddock, S., Cornell, S., Dentoni, D., McLachlan, M., & Meszoely, G. (2015). Large systems change: An emerging field of transformation and transitions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Waddell, S. (2016a). Change for the audacious: A doers’ guide to large systems change for a flourishing future. Boston, MA: Networking Action.Google Scholar
  110. Waddell, S. (2016b). Societal change systems: A framework to address wicked problems. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(4), 422–449.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886316666374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Waddock, S. (2005). Hollow men and women at the helm: Hollow accounting ethics? Issues in Accounting Education, 20(2), 145–150.  https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2005.20.2.145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Waddock, S., Meszoely, G. M., Waddell, S., & Dentoni, D. (2015). The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(6), 993–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2014-0146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Weber, A. (2013). Enlivenment. Towards a fundamental shift in the concepts of nature, culture and politics. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  115. Weber, A. (2016). Biology of wonder: Aliveness, feeling and the metamorphosis of science. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.Google Scholar
  116. Wheatley, M. J., & Kellner-Rogers, M. (1996). A simpler way. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  117. Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science, discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
  118. Wilkinson, A., & Eidinow, E. (2008). Evolving practices in environmental scenarios: A new scenario typology. Environmental Research Letters, 3(4), 045017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Petra Kuenkel
    • 1
  1. 1.Full Member of the Club of RomeCollective Leadership InstitutePotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations