Advertisement

Future Directions

  • Brandon M. Turner
  • Birte U. Forstmann
  • Mark Steyvers
Chapter
Part of the Computational Approaches to Cognition and Perception book series (CACP)

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss several open areas for investigation, areas we consider to be future directions for joint models of neural and behavioral data. We discuss two such directions. First, we discuss new directions in the formulation of linking hypotheses relating neural measures to the parameters of cognitive models. Some of the joint models discussed in our Chap. 4, while elucidating, are very complex and are sometimes unable to scale easily with increases in the number of neural measures. As such, we discuss one method for reducing the dimensionality of the linking function, and provide some examples illustrating the power of this new approach. Second, we discuss some new work relating structural data to functional data in an effort to provide greater constraint on the brain-to-behavior linking hypothesis. We now turn to each of these future directions in turn.

Keywords

Structural equation models Linking functions Postmortem data 

References

  1. 8.
    J.I. Gold, M.N. Shadlen, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 535 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 11.
    L. van Maanen, S.D. Brown, T. Eichele, E.J. Wagenmakers, T. Ho, J. Serences, J. Neurosci. 31, 17488 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 18.
    B.M. Turner, L. Van Maanen, B.U. Forstmann, Psychol. Rev. 122, 312 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 68.
    B.M. Turner, T. Wang, E. Merkel, NeuroImage 153, 28 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 74.
    I.J. Myung, M.A. Pitt, Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4, 79 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 76.
    I.J. Myung, M. Forster, M.W. Browne, J. Math. Psychol. 44, 1 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 86.
    B.U. Forstmann, G. Dutilh, S. Brown, J. Neumann, D.Y. von Cramon, K.R. Ridderinkhof, E.J. Wagenmakers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 17538 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 145.
    R. Ratcliff, J.N. Rouder, Psychol. Sci. 9, 347 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 146.
    B.U. Forstmann, G. de Hollander, L. van Maanen, A. Alkemade, M.C. Keuken, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 57 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 147.
    T. Ho, S. Brown, J. Serences, J. Neurosci. 29, 8675 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 148.
    A.K. Churchland, R. Kiani, M.N. Shadlen, Nat. Neurosci. 11, 693 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 149.
    C.A. K., D. J., Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 150.
    M.C. Keuken, L. Van Maanen, R. Bogacz, A. Schäfer, J. Neumann, R. Turner, B.U. Forstmann, Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 4041 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 151.
    R. Bogacz, K. Gurney, Neural Comput. 19, 442 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 152.
    A. Alkemade, A. Schnitzler, B. Forstmann, Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 3075 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 153.
    K. Gurney, T.J. Prescott, P.A. Redgrave, Biol. Cybern. 84, 401 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 154.
    M.C. Keuken, C. Müller-Axt, R. Langner, S.B. Eickhoff, B.U. Forstmann, J. Neumann, Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 445 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 155.
    M.C. Keuken, H.B.M. Uylings, S. Geyer, A. Schäfer, R. Turner, B.U. Forstmann, Front. Neuroanat. 6 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 156.
    L. Waldorp, I. Christoffels, V. van de Ven, NeuroImage 54, 2695 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brandon M. Turner
    • 1
  • Birte U. Forstmann
    • 2
  • Mark Steyvers
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Cognitive Science CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Cognitive SciencesUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations