Advertisement

Russia’s Strategy of Forging Spaces Around Itself

  • Tomislava Penkova
Chapter

Abstract

Space has always been an organic, intimate element of Russia’s mentality and politics. The country has indeed a long history of moulding spaces around itself which respond to precise (geo)political, economic, and cultural strategies. Today, it pursues its interests mainly in three spaces: in the post-Soviet space, in a space where relations with the US and the European Union (EU) take place, and in the space that includes the Middle East and North Africa. In this manner it seeks to economise resources and build the desired relations with its relevant counterparts for the sake of re-gaining its previous status in international politics. However, Russia’s ambitions are mired in its parallel identity redefinition process and in the complex, unpredictable dynamics with the West. This fact forces her to confirm its traditional spatial vectors of foreign policy. It does not have the potential to provoke systemic changes in international affairs on its own.

References

  1. Arsent’eva, I. 2008. Rossjia mezdu Vostokom i Zapadom: strateghia natzional’noi bezopasnosti. Moskva: Vostok-Zapad.Google Scholar
  2. Baranovski, V. 2000. Russia: A Part of Europe or Apart from Europe? International Affairs 76 (3): 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casier, T. 2017. Punching Above Its Weight? Russia and Power. Reconnecting Europe—Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Foundation, May 23. http://reconnecting-europe.boellblog.org/2017/05/23/833/. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  4. Casula, P. 2017. Russia’s Foreign Policy from the Crimean Crisis to the Middle East: Great Power Gamble or Biopolitics? Rising Powers Quarterly 2 (1): 27–51.Google Scholar
  5. Kholodkovskii, K. 2011. Rossiiskaya identichnost’: Koleblyushchayasya identicnost’. In Identichnost’ kak predmet politicheskogo analiza. Sbornik statei po itogam Vserossiiskoi nauchno-teoreticheskoi konferentsii, ed. I. Semenenko, L. Fadeeva, V. Lapkin, and P. Panov, 151–154. Moskva: IMEMO-RAN.Google Scholar
  6. Klyuchevskiy, V. 1987. Sochineniia. Vol. 3. Moskva: Mysl’.Google Scholar
  7. Korosteleva, E. 2017. Eastern Partnership: Bringing ‘The Political’ Back In. East European Politics 33 (3): 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Malashenko, A. 2017. West and East: Things to Discuss and Agreements to Forge. Russia in Global Affairs, February 13. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/West-and-East-Things-to-Discuss-and-Agreements-to-Forge-18593. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  9. Maliavin, V. 2017. Evrasia: Sniatie Pechatei. Russia in Global Affairs, February 2. http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Evraziya-snyatie-pechatei-18569. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  10. Mezhuev, B. 2017. ‘Ostrov Rossija’ i Rossijskaia politika identicnosti. Russia in Global Affairs, April 6. http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Ostrov-Rossiya-i-rossiiskaya-politika-identichnosti-18657. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  11. Perevezentsev, S. 2004. Smysl russkoi istorii. Moskva: Vece.Google Scholar
  12. Sakwa, R. 2011. Russia’s Identity: Between the Domestic and the International. Europe-Asia Studies 63 (6): 957–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ———. 2012. The Problem of ‘The International’ in Russian Identity Formation. International Politics 49 (4): 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2017. Europe and the Political: From Axiological Monism to Pluralistic Dialogism. East European Politics 33 (3): 406–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skriba, A. 2016. Russian Strategy Towards the Post-Soviet Space in Europe: Searching for Balance Between Economy, Security, and Great Power Attractiveness. Strategic Analysis 40 (6): 604–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Trenin, D. 2017a. Russia’s Evolving Grand Eurasia Strategy: Will It Work?. Carnegie Moscow, July 20. http://carnegie.ru/2017/07/20/russia-s-evolving-grand-eurasia-strategy-will-it-work-pub-71588. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  17. ———. 2017b. China, Russia Needs Shared Vision for Eurasia. Global Times, July 3. http://carnegie.ru/2017/07/03/china-russia-need-shared-vision-for-eurasia-pub-71441. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.
  18. Tsygankov, A. 2012. The Heartland No More: Russia’s Weakness and Eurasia’s Meltdown. Journal of Eurasian Studies 3 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2016. Russia’s Foreign Policy. Change and Continuity in National Identity. Lanham: Rowman & Littkefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2017. In the Shadow of Nikolai Danilevskii: Universalism, Particularism, and Russian Geopolitical Theory. Europe-Asia Studies 69 (4): 571–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yefremenko, D. 2017. The Birth of a Greater Eurasia. Russia in Global Affairs, February 13. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/The-Birth-of-a-Greater-Eurasia-18591. Accessed 1 Jan 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomislava Penkova
    • 1
  1. 1.Brussels School of International Studies, University of KentBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations