Advertisement

HOUSE 1 Protostructure: Enhancement of Spatial Imagination and Craftsmanship Between the Digital and the Analogical

  • Dieter Dietz
  • Dario Negueruela del CastilloEmail author
  • Agathe Mignon
  • Julien Lafontaine Carboni
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 24)

Abstract

Conceived around the concept of protostructure, HOUSE 1 deploys a strategy to answer a daring but simple question: How could we design a house between almost 300 people? The unique pedagogical framework of ALICE, first year Architectural Design course, proposes the integration of a series of full scale physical wooden constructs, enacting collaborative thinking and drawing on collective spatial knowledge. The protostructure constitutes at once both a material and immaterial open source support for the individual and collective interventions by the students. Its material dimension as a physical construction is invested and complemented by the immateriality of the guiding scheme. In this article, we review the steps in the development of the theoretical model and physical implementation of HOUSE 1 and discuss its relevance with regards to the relation between analogical and digital modes of engagement, pedagogical frameworks and spatial cognitive strategies. This implementation of the protostructure shows its potential as a tool to approach wood design, through a combination of digital and analogical processes, enhancing the deployment of spatial cognitive strategies with the use of wood as a material through and with which to think about space.

Keywords

Protostructure Collaborative design Pedagogy Craftsmanship Open source Database Spatial imagination Parametric design Fabrication strategies 

References

  1. Baack S (2015) Datafication and empowerment: how the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data Soc 2:205395171559463.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715594634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barthélémy J-H, Boever AD (2012) Glossary: fifty key terms in the works of Gilbert Simondon. In: De Boever A, Murray A, Roffe J (eds) Gilbert Simondon: being and technology. Edinburgh University Press, pp 203–231Google Scholar
  3. Clark A (1997) Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  4. Couldry N, Powell A (2014) Big data from the bottom up. Big Data Soc 1:205395171453927.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cross N (2001) Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des Issues 17:49–55.  https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Boever A (ed) (2012) Gilbert Simondon: being and technology. Edinburgh University Press, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  7. Demil B, Lecocq X (2006) Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: the emergence of bazaar governance. Organ Stud 27:1447–1466.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freksa C (1991) Qualitative spatial reasoning. Springer Google Scholar
  9. Gallistel CR (2017) Navigation: whence our sense of direction? Curr Biol 27:R108–R110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiménez AC (2003) On space as a capacity. jroyaanthinst. J Royal Anthropol Inst 9:137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelty CM (2008) Two bits: the cultural significance of free software, Experimental futures. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  12. Lecourt D (ed) (2006) Dictionnaire d’histoire et philosophie des sciences, 4e éd., rev. et augmentée. ed, Quadrige. Dicos poche. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Matei A, Irimia SI (2014) Open source governance—a more ambitious cousin of collaborative governance. Int J Public Adm 37:812–823.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.907315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Negueruela Del Castillo D (2015) The city as a prototype. A frame for pragmatic social action. In: Bianchetti C, Cogato Lanza E, Enver Kercuku A, Sampieri A, Voghera A (eds) Territories in crisis. Architecture and urbanism facing changes in Europe. Jovis, Berlin, pp 222–234Google Scholar
  15. Open Definition 2.1—open definition—defining open in open data, open content and open knowledge [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/. Accessed 25 May 18)
  16. Pizzi M (2003) The invention of the balloon frame, how it affected architecture in the New World. The case of Chile. In: Proceedings of the first international congress on construction history, Madrid, 20th–24th Jan 2003. Presented at the first international congress on construction history, I. Juan de Herrera, Madrid, p 10Google Scholar
  17. Portugali J (2005) Cognitive maps are over 60. In: Cohn AG, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajanen M, Iivari N (2015) Power, empowerment and open source usability. ACM Press, pp 3413–3422.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702441
  19. Ratti C, Claudel M (2015) Open source architecture. Thames & Hudson, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Simondon G (2005) L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information, Krisis. Millon, GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  21. Simondon G (1958) Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier et Montaigne, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. Stallman R (2007) Why “Open Source” misses the point of free software. GNU.orgGoogle Scholar
  23. Sterelny K (2013) Cooperation and its evolution. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Sterelny K (2010) Minds: extended or scaffolded? Phenomenol Cognitive Sci 9:465–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-010-9174-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stiegler B (2008) Prendre soin, La bibliothèque des savoirs. Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. The Cathedral and the Bazaar [WWW Document], n.d. URL http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/homesteading/cathedral-bazaar/index.html. Accessed 25 May 2018
  27. The Open Definition—open definition—defining open in open data, open content and open knowledge [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://opendefinition.org/. Accessed 25 May 2018
  28. Turan M (2009) Reconstructing the balloon frame: a study in the history of architectonics. METU J Fac Archit 26:175–209.  https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2009.2.10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tversky B (2009) Spatial Cognition. Embodied and situated. In: Robbins P, Aydede M (eds) The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, pp 201–216Google Scholar
  30. Tversky B (1993) Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In: European conference on spatial information theory. Springer, pp 14–24Google Scholar
  31. Tversky B, Hard BM (2009) Embodied and disembodied cognition: spatial perspective-taking. Cognition 110:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber S (2005) The success of open source. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Dietz
    • 1
  • Dario Negueruela del Castillo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agathe Mignon
    • 1
  • Julien Lafontaine Carboni
    • 1
  1. 1.ALICE Space Design WorkshopFederal Polytechnic School of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations