Network Metrics for Assessing the Quality of Entity Resolution Between Multiple Datasets
Matching entities between datasets is a crucial step for combining multiple datasets on the semantic web. A rich literature exists on different approaches to this entity resolution problem. However, much less work has been done on how to assess the quality of such entity links once they have been generated. Evaluation methods for link quality are typically limited to either comparison with a ground truth dataset (which is often not available), manual work (which is cumbersome and prone to error), or crowd sourcing (which is not always feasible, especially if expert knowledge is required). Furthermore, the problem of link evaluation is greatly exacerbated for links between more than two datasets, because the number of possible links grows rapidly with the number of datasets. In this paper, we propose a method to estimate the quality of entity links between multiple datasets. We exploit the fact that the links between entities from multiple datasets form a network, and we show how simple metrics on this network can reliably predict their quality. We verify our results in a large experimental study using six datasets from the domain of science, technology and innovation studies, for which we created a gold standard. This gold standard, available online, is an additional contribution of this paper. In addition, we evaluate our metric on a recently published gold standard to confirm our findings.
KeywordsEntity resolution Data integration Network metrics
We kindly thank Paul Groth for his constructive comments and proofreading, Alieh Saeedi for sharing her experiments data and supporting the reproducibility of their experiments, and the EKAW reviewers for constructive comments. This work was supported by the European Union’s 7th Framework Programme under the project RISIS (GA no. 313082).
- 1.Baron, A., Freedman, M.: Who is who and what is what: experiments in cross-document co-reference. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 274–283. Association for Computational Linguistics (2008)Google Scholar
- 2.Cucerzan, S.: Large-scale named entity disambiguation based on Wikipedia data. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on EMNLP-CoNLL (2007)Google Scholar
- 6.Guéret, C., Groth, P., Stadler, C., Lehmann, J.: Assessing linked data mappings using network measures. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 87–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30284-8_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hassanzadeh, O., Kementsietsidis, A., Lim, L., Miller, R.J., Wang, M.: A framework for semantic link discovery over relational data. In: 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1027–1036. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Li, W., Zhang, S., Qi, G.: A graph-based approach for resolving incoherent ontology mappings. In: Web Intelligence, vol. 16, pp. 15–35. IOS Press (2018)Google Scholar
- 12.Ngomo, A.-C.N., Auer, S.: Limes-a time-efficient approach for large-scale link discovery on the web of data. In: IJCAI, pp. 2312–2317 (2011)Google Scholar
- 14.Sarasua, C., Staab, S., Thimm, M.: Methods for intrinsic evaluation of links in the web of data. In: Blomqvist, E., Maynard, D., Gangemi, A., Hoekstra, R., Hitzler, P., Hartig, O. (eds.) ESWC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10249, pp. 68–84. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar