Advertisement

Pioneer Analysis as a Futures Research Method for Analysing Transformations

  • Sirkka HeinonenEmail author
  • Joni Karjalainen
Chapter
Part of the Anticipation Science book series (ANTISC, volume 4)

Abstract

Pioneers drive futures. The book chapter presents pioneer analysis as a useful approach for the analysis of transformations in the context of futures research and anticipation. The chapter begins with an introduction on how pioneers have typically been conceptualised in academic literature. We claim pioneering actions as analogous to weak signals of emerging futures, because they manifest possible futures that may be realised – or not. The chapter provides two methodological examples, which illustrate how pioneers can be identified, conceptualised and explored. Analysing pioneers creates critical understanding about the role of key actors who drive transformations and create the futures. Pioneers tackle uncertainty with problem-solving and by identifying systemic bottlenecks. Therefore, the actions of pioneers may have an emancipatory effect and provide leverage points for broader changes. In terms of policy relevance, we are interested in how policies can support those pioneers who aim to shape society in a positive way and enable desirable futures to be achieved. Pioneer analysis is also interested in the positive and negative outcomes, if such futures are realised. The chapter concludes by discussing areas for further methodological development.

Keywords

Agency Emancipation Pioneer analysis Transformation Renewable energy 

References

  1. Abson, David J., Joern Fischer, Julia Leventon, Jens Newig, Thomas Schomerus, Ulli Vilsmaier, Henrik von Wehrden, Paivi Abernethy, Christopher D. Ives, Nicolas W. Jager, and Daniel J. Lang. 2016. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggestam, M. 2008. The myth of entrepreneurship. In Organizational epics and sagas, ed. M. Kostera, 14–25. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583603_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amara, R. 1981. The futures field: Searching for definitions and boundaries. The Futurist 15 (1): 25–29.Google Scholar
  4. Beal, G.M., E.M. Rogers, and J.M. Bohlen. 1957. Validity of the concept of stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociology 22 (2): 166–168.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, Martin, and Paulo N. Figueiredo. 2012. Building innovative capabilities in latecomer emerging market firms: Some key issues. In Innovative firms in emerging market countries, ed. Edmund Amann and John Cantwell, 24–110. Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646005.003.0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, Wendell. 1996. Foundations of futures studies: Human science for a new era: History, purposes, knowledge. 3rd Printing edition. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Boutellier, R., and M. Heinzen. 2014a. The myth of the Pioneer. In Growth through innovation. Management for professionals, 71–84. Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04016-5_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2014b. Pirates, pioneers, innovators and imitators. In Growth through innovation. Management for professionals, 85–96. Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04016-5_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradfield, R., G. Wright, G. Burt, G. Cairns, and K.V.D. Heijden. 2005. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures 37 (8): 795–812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brush, Candida G. 2008. Pioneering strategies for entrepreneurial success. Business Horizons 51 (1): 21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.09.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Covin, Jeffrey G., Dennis P. Slevin, and Michael B. Heeley. 2000. Pioneers and followers. Journal of Business Venturing 15 (2): 175–210.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00015-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalling, J.W. 2008. In Pioneer Species, In Encyclopedia of Ecology, ed. Sven Erik Jørgensen and Brian D. Fath, 2779–2782. Oxford: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00534-6. isbn:9780080454054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dator, J. 2009. Alternative futures at the Manoa school. Journal of Futures Studies 14 (2): 1–18.Google Scholar
  14. Day, George S., and Paul J.H. Schoemaker. 2006. Peripheral vision: Detecting the weak signals that will make or break your company. 1st ed. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  15. Drucker, Peter F. 2014. Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durepos G., Mills J.H., Mills A.J. 2008. The Pan American dream and the myth of the Pioneer. In: Kostera M. (eds) Organizational Epics and sagas. Palgrave Macmillan, London  https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583603_14, pp. 156–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elkington, John, Pamela Hartigan, and Alejandro Litovsky. 2010. From Enterprise to ecosystem: Rebooting the scale debate. In Scaling social impact, 83–102. Social Entrepreneurship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-11356-5_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller, Ted, and Lorraine Warren. 2006. Entrepreneurship as foresight: A complex social network perspective on Organisational foresight. Futures 38 (8): 956–971.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gladwell, M. 2000. The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  20. Gordon, Adam. 2009. Future savvy. Identifying trends to make better decisions, manage uncertainty, and profit from change. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
  21. Heinonen, Sirkka, and Juho Ruotsalainen. 2012. Toward the age of neo-entrepreneurs. World Future Review 4 (2): 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heinonen, Sirkka. 2017. Chapter 8: Pioneer analysis and international cultural changes. Application of positrend and negatrend analysis in the identification of cultural change. In How do we explore our futures? Acta Futura Fennica, ed. Osmo Kuusi, Sirkka Heinonen, and Hazel Salminen, vol. 10, 241–251. Helsinki: Finnish Society for Futures Studies.Google Scholar
  23. Hills, Jeremy M., and Evanthie Michalena. 2017. Renewable energy pioneers are threatened by EU policy reform. Renewable Energy 108 (August): 26–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.042. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hiltunen, Elina. 2008. The future sign and its three dimensions. Futures 40 (3): 247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.08.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2010. “Weak signals in organizational futures learning.” Doctoral dissertation, Helsinki: Aalto University School of Economics. http://epub.lib.aalto.fi/fi/diss/?cmd=show&dissid=400.
  26. Hiltunen, E. 2013. Foresight and innovation – How companies are coping with the future? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Inayatullah, S. 2008. Six pillars: Futures thinking for transforming. Foresight 10: 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacob, Jeffrey. 1997. New pioneers. The back-to-land movement and the search for a sustainable future. The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Jouvenel, Hugues. 2004. An invitation to foresight. Paris: Futuribles.Google Scholar
  31. Karjalainen, Joni, Heinonen, Sirkka, Ruotsalainen, Juho, and Byrne, Rob. 2018. Radical solar startups in Kenya and Tanzania. Neo-Carbon Energy WP1 Working Paper 2/2018. Finland Futures Research Centre: University of Turku.Google Scholar
  32. Lang, Merja, Joni Karjalainen, and Sirkka Heinonen. 2016. “Glocal Insights to Neo-Carbon Energy and Its Forerunners.” Neo-Carbon Energy WP1 Working Paper 4/2016. Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre and University of Turku.Google Scholar
  33. Loorbach, Derk, and Jan Rotmans. 2010. The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42 (3): 237–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lustig, Patricia. 2015. Strategic foresight. Learning from the future. Axminster: Triarchy.Google Scholar
  35. Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. 1st ed. Anthem Press, 266 p.Google Scholar
  37. Meadows, Donella. 2008. Thinking in systems: A primer. London: Routledge/Earthscan.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, R., Poli, R., & Rossel, P. 2014. The discipline of anticipation: Exploring key issues. UNESCO, The Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Nadin, M. 2012. Prolegomena: What speaks in favor of an inquiry into anticipatory processes. In Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations, ed. J. Rosen, xv–lx. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  40. Nash, D., G. Kass-Simon, and P. Farnes. 1990. Women in science: Righting the record. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nygrén, Nina A., Panu Kontio, Jari Lyytimäki, Vilja Varho, and Petri Tapio. 2015. Early adopters boosting the diffusion of sustainable small-scale energy solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 46 (June): 79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.031. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Neill, K., and D. Gibbs. 2016. Rethinking green entrepreneurship - fluid narratives of the green economy. Environment and Planning A 48 (9): 1727–1749.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16650453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poli, R. 2017. Introduction to anticipation studies. Anticipation science 1. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2009. The complexity of anticipation. The Balkan Journal of Philosophy 1 (1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poli, Roberto. 2017a. Pragmatic Utopias, Presentation, Anticipation Workshop: Trento 6–8 April 2017, 44 ppt.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 2017b. Introduction to anticipation. Anticipation Science 1. Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Rosen, R. 1985. Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations. 1st ed. Oxford/New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schumpeter, Joseph 1934. Theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle, Harvard Economic Studies 46.Google Scholar
  49. Sperling, Karl. 2017. How does a Pioneer Community energy project succeed in practice? The case of the Samsø renewable Energy Island. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 71 (May): 884–897.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stirling, Andrew. 2015. Emancipating transformation: From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical Progress. In The politics of green transformations, ed. Ian Scoones, Melissa Leach, and Peter Newell, 54–67. London: Routledge http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/64945/.Google Scholar
  51. Sovacool, B.K., and B. Brossmann. 2013. Fantastic futures and three American energy transitions. Science as Culture 22 (2): 204–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spar, D. 2001. Pirates, prophets and pioneers: Business and politics along the technological frontier. Random House Business Books. isbn:9780712670944 352 p.Google Scholar
  53. Tuomi, Ilkka. 2002. Networks of innovation. Change and meaning in the age of the internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. UNGC. 2017. UN global compact seeks out 2017 SDG pioneers. United Nations Global Compact. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpiFP916hHQ&feature=youtu.be.
  55. van der Heijden, Kees. 2005. Scenarios – The art of strategic conversation. 2nd ed. Wiley., ISBN: 978-0-470-02368-6 382 p.Google Scholar
  56. van Notten, P.W.F., J. Rotmans, M.B.A. van Asselt, and D.S. Rothman. 2003. An updated scenario typology. Futures 35 (5): 423–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-3287(02)00090-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wagner, Rodrigo, and Andrés Zahler. 2015. New exports from emerging markets: Do followers benefit from pioneers? Journal of Development Economics 114 (May): 203–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.12.002. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walrave, Bob, Madis Talmar, Ksenia S. Podoynitsyna, A. Georges L. Romme, Geert P.J. Verbong. 2018. A multi-level perspective on innovation ecosystems for path-breaking innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, ISSN 0040-1625,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wangel, Josefin. 2011a. Exploring social structures and Agency in Backcasting Studies for sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (5): 872–882.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 2011b. Change by whom? Four ways of adding actors and governance in Backcasting studies. Futures 43 (8): 880–889.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiek, Arnim, and Daniel J. Lang. 2016. Transformational sustainability research methodology. In Sustainability science, ed. Harald Heinrichs, Pim Martens, Gerd Michelsen, and Arnim Wiek, 31–41. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Finland Futures Research Centre (FFRC)University of TurkuHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations