Advertisement

Social Responsibility and Sustainability: How Companies and Organizations Understand Their Sustainability Reporting Obligations

  • L. Folkens
  • P. SchneiderEmail author
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Since 2015 exists at EU level the obligation for certain enterprises to prepare a sustainability report. This concerns particularly the DAX 30 organizations, which had to adapt their corporate reporting till 2017, including the adaptation of the existing reporting on social and ecological contents. Siemens, for instance, already presented in 2000 a “Corporate Citizenship Report” (CCR). Beside the CCR there is a wide range of terms for sustainability reporting, such as “CSR-Report”, “Sustainable Value Report” or “Sustainability Report”. Beside the variation of the report titles, also regarding the focal issues an ambivalent interpretation occurs. A large part of the reporting enterprises orientates itself on the reporting standards of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Also the integration of ecological and social subjects in the annual business report is practiced. The present publication compares the sustainability reports of all DAX 30 enterprises and discusses the content differences. Beside the report titles, it investigates the correlation between titles and content. Scope of the contribution is to find out whether a clear border can be pulled between CSR reports and sustainability report and if so which are the assessment criteria.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility and sustainability Corporate responsibility report Sustainability report Corporate citizenship report Sustainable value report 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbott WF, Monsen RJ (1979) On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: selfreported disclosures as a measurement of corporate social involvement. S.l.: Acad. Manag JGoogle Scholar
  2. Azzone G et al (1997) A stakeholder’s view of environmental reporting. Long Range PlannGoogle Scholar
  3. Baviera-Puig A et al (2015) Assessing the communication quality of CSR reports. A case study on four spanish food companies. SustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthold, Lingenfelder M (2014) Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium—Zeitschrift für Studium und Forschung, p 414Google Scholar
  5. Blankenagel L (2007) CSR-Berichte als Kommunikationsinstrument der DAX-Unternehmen. VDM Verlag, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosch-Badia M-T, Montllor-Serrats J, Tarrazon-Rodon M-A (2017) Efficiency and sustainability of CSR projects. SustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  7. Braun S, Doerner U, Horst DW, Loew T (2010) Unternehmerische Verantwortung praktisch umsetzen. [Online] [Cited: April 02, 2015.] https://www.pwc.de/de/nachhaltigkeit/assets/Brosch_Nachhaltigkeit_2010.pdf
  8. Bundesministerium für Umwelt (2007) Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit; econsense—Forum Nachhaltige Entwicklung der Deutschen Wirtschaft e. V. und Centre for Sustainability Management Leuphana Universität Lüneburg (Hrsg.). Schaltegger S, Herzig C, Kleiber O, Müller J (Authors) (2007) Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement in Unternehmen—Von der Idee zur Praxis: Managementansätze zur Umsetzung von Corporate Social Responsibility und Corporate Sustainability. Berlin, LüneburgGoogle Scholar
  9. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (2014) Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen—Eine Orientierungshilfe für Kernthemen und Handlungsfelder des Leitfadens DIN ISO 26000. Berlin: s.n.Google Scholar
  10. Burckhardt G (2013) Corporate social responsibility—Mythen und Maßnahmen. Springer Gabler, BonnCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EFFAS (2015) KPIs for ESG 3.0. [Online] 2010. [Cited: April 01, 2015.] http://www.effas-esg.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/07/KPIs_for_ESG_3_0_Final.pdf
  12. Emerson J (2015) The blended value proposition (PDF). California management review. Retrieved 20 July 2015Google Scholar
  13. Fifka MS (2014) CSR und Reporting: Nachhaltigkeits- und CSR-Berichterstattung verstehen und erfolgreich umsetzen. Springer Gabler Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fifka MS, Drabble M (2012) Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting—a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. S.l.: Bus Strategy EnvCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Folkens L (2015) Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung im Kontext des Nachhaltigkeitsmanagements von Unternehmen der Automobilzulieferindustrie. Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal, MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  16. Global reporting initiative (2013) G4 Leitlinien zur NachhaltigkeitsberichterstattungGoogle Scholar
  17. Global Reporting Initiative (2015) Materiality check. [Online] [Cited: March 26, 2015.] https://www.globalreporting.org/reporting/report-services/Pages/materialitydisclosures-service.aspx
  18. Global Reporting Initiative (2017) Database. [Online] [Cited: December 12, 2017.] https://database.globalreporting.org/
  19. Global Reporting Initiative (2018) Sustainability disclosure database—data legend. [Online] [Cited: February 17, 2018.] https://www.globalreporting.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/GRI-Data-Legend-Sustainability-Disclosure-Database-Profiling.pdf
  20. Gómez JM, Lang C, Wohlgemuth V (2013) IT-gestütztes Ressourcen- und Energiemanagement. Springer Vieweg Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gray R (2001) Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt?. A European Review, Business EthicsGoogle Scholar
  22. Institut für ökologische Wirtschaftsforschung (IÖW) (2001) Der Nachhaltigkeitsbericht. [Online] [Cited: Februar 14, 2018.] https://www.ioew.de/fileadmin/_migrated/tx_ukioewdb/Der_Nachhaltigkeisbericht.pdf
  23. Invernizzi DC, Locatelli G, Brookes NJ (2017) Managing social challenges in the nuclear decommissioning industry: a responsible approach towards better performance. Int J Proj Manag Soc Responsib. Management of Megaprojects. 2017-10-01, 35(7):1350–1364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. KPMG (2011) International survey of corporate responsibility reporting. AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. Manetti G, Becatti L (2008) Assurance services for sustainability reports: standards and empirical evidenceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matuszak Ł, Różańska E (2017) CSR Disclosure in polish-listed companies in the light of directive 2014/95/EU requirements: empirical evidence. SustainabilityGoogle Scholar
  27. Owen D (2008) Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research. A.l.: Acc Auditing and Accountability JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer K (1995) Tightening environmental standards: the benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? J Econ Perspect 9(4):119–132.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119.JSTOR2138393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Preston LE (1997) The social-financial performance relationship (PDF) Business and society. 36(4):419.  https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600406. Retrieved 20 July 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (2015) Der Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitskodex—Maßstab für nachhaltiges WirtschaftenGoogle Scholar
  31. Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung (2018) Der Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitskodex—Datenbank. [Online] 2018. [Cited: Februar 15, 2018.] http://www.deutscher-nachhaltigkeitskodex.de/de/datenbank/dnk-datenbank.html
  32. Recarbon Deutschland Gmbh (2014) Webinar—Verpflichtende Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. [Online] [Cited: März 12, 2015.] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZGAVOFASz8
  33. Schaltegger S, Herzig C, Klinke T (2007) Umweltschutz der Wirtschaft. [Online] [Cited: April 17, 2015.] http://www2.leuphana.de/umanagement/csm/content/nama/downloads/download_publikationen/SchalteggerHerzigKlinke.pdf
  34. Senge PM (2011) Die notwendige Revolution. Carl-Auer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. SMI EBS Business School/Logica (2011) Excellence in supply chain sustainability, Studie der EBS business school wiesbaden und logica deutschland GmbH & Co KGGoogle Scholar
  36. Springer Gabler Verlag (2018) Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon. Datenanalyse. [Online] [Cited: Januar 08, 2018.] http://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/Archiv/1823/datenanalyse-v10.html
  37. Umweltbundesamt (2006) Lagebericht zur Lageberichterstattung. [Online] [Cited: April 02, 2015.] http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3236.pdf
  38. UN Global Compact (2014) Database. [Online] [Cited: Januar 15, 2014.] www.unglobalcompact.org/ParticipantsAndStakeholders/index.html
  39. UN Global Compact (2015) About us. [Online] [Cited: March 30, 2015.] http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/index.html
  40. UN Global Compact (2015) Fortschrittsmitteilungen. [Online] [Cited: March 30, 2015.] https://www.unglobalcompact.org/Languages/german/fortschrittsmitteilungen.html

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-StendalMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter