Advertisement

Enhancing Organizations’ Social Responsibility by Workplace Health Promotion?

  • Eva BambergEmail author
  • Grit Tanner
  • Carolin Baur
  • Marlies Gude
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

The idea behind the social responsibility of organizations is that firms have responsibilities beyond maximizing profit. They are accountable not only to their owners and shareholders but also to stakeholders, such as customers. In recent years, the social responsibility of organizations has become increasingly important. Models and management systems using the term corporate social responsibility (CSR) have been developed. However, the concept of CSR is not uncontroversial. CSR is criticized as a new trend with no content. CSR programmes are often decoupled from the core business, and they are often only marketing and symbolic gestures. In this paper, we argue that an integration of CSR into other management systems such as human resource management or health promotion may have various positive effects. These effects concern both CSR and the other management systems. Using the example of workplace health promotion (WHP), positive reciprocal effects can be explained as follows. On the one hand, by conducting WHP, organizations show responsibility towards their employees, therefore enhancing CSR. CSR can be improved by considering the WHP structure and topic, such as a focus on interventions. On the other hand, the concepts of CSR can contribute to the spread of WHP. Organizations’ influences on WHP can be extended by the inclusion of other organizations in the supply chain and by networking. In this context, the quality of interactions between the organizations must be considered. The development and use of criteria are needed to guarantee positive effects on both CSR and WHP.

Keywords

Workplace health promotion (Corporate) social responsibility Management systems Supply chain Networks 

References

  1. Alvarado-Herrera A, Bigne E, Aldas-Manzano J, Curras-Perez R (2017) A scale for measuring consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility following the sustainable development paradigm. J Bus Ethics 140(2):243–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamberg E, Ducki A, Metz A-M (2011) Gesundheitsförderung und Gesundheitsmanagement in der Arbeitswelt. Ein Handbuch. Hogrefe, Innovatives Management, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamberg E, Dettmers J, Tanner G (2016) Diffundierende Grenzen von Organisationskulturen – die Rolle von Kundinnen und Kunden. In: Badura B, Ducki A, Schröder H, Klose J, Meyer M (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 2016. Unternehmenskultur und Gesundheit - Herausforderungen und Chancen: Zahlen, Daten, Analysen aus allen Branchen der Wirtschaft: mit 130 Abbildungen und 253 Tabellen. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee SB (2012) Corporate social responsibility. The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociol 34(1):51–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baur C (2018) Nachhaltigkeit in der Wertschöpfungskette: Das Problem des eingeschränkten moralischen Bewusstseins. In: Schmitt C, Bamberg E (eds) Psychologie und Nachhaltigkeit. Theoretische Grundlagen, Anwendungsbeispiele und Zukunftsperspektiven. Springer, Heidelberg pp 149–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck D, Lenhardt U, Schmitt B, Sommer S (2015) Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany. BMC Public Health 15:343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bondy K, Moon J, Matten D (2012) An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs) form and implications. J Bus Ethics 111(2):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll AB (2015) Corporate social responsibility. Org Dyn 44(2):95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities (2001) Green paper. Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. European Commission, Brussels 18 July, 2001. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_DOC-01-9_en.pdf. Last accessed 05 Feb 2018
  10. Commission of the European Communities (o.J.) Corporate social responsibility (CSR). European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/corporate-social-responsibility_en. Last access 20 Feb 2018
  11. Cox T (1997) Workplace health promotion. Work & Stress 11(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dachler HP, Wilpert B (1978) Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: a critical evaluation. Adm Sci Q 23(1):1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined. An analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dezmar-Krainz K (2015) Enhancing wellbeing of employees through corporate social responsibility context. Megatrend Revija 12(2):137–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dieterich C, Vetter C, Naji N (2000) Krankheitsbedingte Fehlzeiten in der deutschen Wirtschaft. In Badura B, Litsch M, Vetter C (eds) Fehlzeiten-Report 1999. Psychische Belastung am Arbeitsplatz Zahlen, Daten, Fakten aus allen Branchen der Wirtschaft. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 363–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du S, Bhattacharya CB, Sen S (2011) Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage. Overcoming the trust barrier. Manag Sci 57(9):1528–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ENWHP (2007) Luxembourg declaration on workplace health promotion. European Network for Workplace Health Promotion. http://www.enwhp.org/fileadmin/rs-dokumente/dateien/Luxembourg_Declaration.pdf. Last accessed 12 Feb 2018
  18. Eriksson D, Svensson G (2016) The process of responsibility, decoupling point, and disengagement of moral and social responsibility in supply chains. Empirical findings and prescriptive thoughts. J Bus Ethics 134(2):281–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gröneweg C, Matiaske W (2012) Gullivers Fesseln—corporate social responsibility. Werkstatt für Organisations- und Personalforschung e.V., 25. https://www.econstor.eu/obitstream/10419/70813/1/73372115X.pdf. Last accessed 23 Mar 2018
  20. Gude M, Bamberg E, Etzold M, Wolf KJ (2017) Macht sich Gesundheitsmanagement bezahlt? Eine empirische Untersuchung des Einflusses von Informationen zu betrieblichem Gesundheitsmanagement auf konsumbezogene Reaktionen von VerbraucherInnen. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 18(3):328–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gude M (2018) Konsumhandlungen und Nachhaltigkeit: (Wie) Passt das zusammen? In: Schmitt C, Bamberg E (eds) Psychologie und Nachhaltigkeit. Theoretische Grundlagen, Anwendungsbeispiele und Zukunftsperspektiven. Springer, Heidelberg pp 135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ha-Brookshire J (2017) Toward moral responsibility theories of corporate sustainability and sustainable supply chain. J Bus Ethics 145(2):227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammer SS, Liebherr M, Kersten S, Haas CT (2015) Adherence to worksite health interventions. Practical recommendations based on a theoretical framework. J Work Behav Health 30(4):325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harden A, Peersman G, Oliver S, Mauthner M, Oakley A (1999) A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the workplace. Occup Med 49(8):540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jain A, Leka S, Zwetsloot G (2011) Corporate social responsibility and psychosocial risk management in Europe. J Bus Ethics 101(4):619–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jain A, Ripa D, Herrero J (2014) An analysis of the coverage of psychosocial factors at work in corporate social responsibility instruments and standards. In: Leka S, Sinclair RR (eds) Contemporary occupational health psychology. Global perspectives on research and practice, vol 3. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp 218–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janetzke H, Ertel M (2017) Psychosocial risk management in more and less favorable workplace conditions. Int J Work Health Manag 10(4):300–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Locke R, Romis M (2007) Improving work conditions in a global supply chain. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 48(2):54–62Google Scholar
  29. Locke R, Amengual M, Mangla A (2009) Virtue out of necessity? Compliance, commitment, and the improvement of labor conditions in global supply chains. Polit & Soc 37(3):319–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacLean TI, Behnam M (2010) The dangers of decoupling. The relationship between compliance programs, legitimacy, perceptions, and institutionalized misconduct. Acad Manag J 53(6):1499–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCoy K, Stinson K, Scott K, Tenney L, Newman LS (2014) Health promotion in small business: a systematic review of factors influencing adoption and effectiveness of worksite wellness programs. J Occup Environ Med 56(6):579–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ming Y, Grabot B, Houé R (2014) A typology of the situations of cooperation in supply chains. Comput Ind Eng 67:56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. OECD (2016) Health at a Glance: Europe 2016. State of Health in the EU Cycle. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Health-at-a-Glance-Europe-2016-CHARTSET.pdf. Last accessed 16 Mar 2018
  34. Pagell M, Wu Z (2009) Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars. J Supply Chain Manag 45(2):37–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pope S, Wæraas A (2016) CSR-washing is rare. A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. J Bus Ethics 137(1):173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanner G, Schmidt T (2017) Do CSR activities always promote organizational identification? Organizational identification as pathway between CSR activities and commitment. In: Oral presentation at the 18th conference of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, DublinGoogle Scholar
  37. Tanner G, Bamberg E, Gude M (2018a) Corporate social responsibility: Verständnis, Bedingungen und Wirkungen. In Schmitt C, Bamberg E (eds) Psychologie und Nachhaltigkeit. Theoretische Grundlagen, Anwendungsbeispiele und Zukunftsperspektiven. Springer, Heidelberg pp 113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tanner G, Bamberg E, Gude M (2018b) Workplace health promotion inspired by corporate social responsibility—interactions within supply chains and networks. Manag Rev (submitted)Google Scholar
  39. Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance. management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Acad Manag J 42(5):539–552Google Scholar
  40. WHO (2010) WHO healthy workplace framework and model. Background and supporting literature and practices. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/occupational_health/healthy_workplace_framework.pdf. Last accessed 20 Feb 2018
  41. WHO (2018a) Absenteeism from work due to illness, days per employee per year. World Health Organization. https://gateway.euro.who.int/en/indicators/hfa_411-2700-absenteeism-from-work-due-to-illness-days-per-employee-per-year/visualizations/#id=19398&tab=graph. Last accessed 16 Mar 2018
  42. WHO (2018b) Five keys to healthy workplaces. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/occupational_health/5_keys_EN_web.pdf?ua=1. Last accessed 19 Feb 2018
  43. Zink KJ (2014) Designing sustainable work systems. The need for a systems approach. Appl Ergon 45(1):128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zwetsloot G, Starren A (2004) Corporate social responsibility and safety and health at work. Office for Official Publication of the European Communities. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 60Google Scholar
  45. Zwetsloot GIJM (2017) OSH management in small and micro enterprises. OSHwiki. https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/OSH_management_in_small_and_micro_enterprises. Last accessed 16 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Bamberg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grit Tanner
    • 1
  • Carolin Baur
    • 1
  • Marlies Gude
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement, Institute of Psychology, Work and Organizational PsychologyUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations