Advertisement

Strengths and Weaknesses of Community-Based Systems in Municipal Services Delivery: The Case of a Community-Based Water Supply Scheme in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

  • Yohannes Edwin KachenjeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Towards the end of the 20th century, the world experienced serious deterioration of infrastructure services, thus raising concerns to the global community. Because of that, municipal services delivery, particularly water supply in most cities of the world witnessed institutional reforms and increased participation of non-public actors, including community-based actors. In Tanzanian city of Dar es Salaam, community-based water supply schemes have become an important institution through which a number of urban communities get their potable water supply. Although these schemes have established themselves as provider institutions, more knowledge of the extent to which their operations are sustainable is still needed. This paper therefore, discuses strengths and weaknesses of the community-based schemes, in fulfilling their social responsibility of service delivery to the community. The paper is mainly based on primary data together with some document analysis. The data was collected through key informant interviews, focus group discussions and some household interviews. This paper points out that community-based schemes derive their strength for sustainable operations from inter-alia their good organization structures, adherence to the rules, and application of innovative monitoring approaches. Weaknesses are related to outdated system of data storage and processing, and insufficient creativity in competition with other schemes.

Keywords

Coordination Institutions Sustainable service delivery Water supply Dar es Salaam 

References

  1. Bel G, Fageda H (2008) Reforming the local public sector: economics and politics in the privatisation of water and solid waste. J Econ Policy Reform 11(1):45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crowston K, Rubleske J, Howison J (2004) Coordination theory: a ten year retrospective. Syracuse University, School of Information Studies, New York, p 38Google Scholar
  3. Hodgson GM (2006) What are institutions. J Econ Issues XL(1):1–25Google Scholar
  4. Hudalah D, Winarso H, Woltjer J (2010) Policy networking as capacity building: an analysis of regional road development conflict in Indonesia. SAGE online version http://plt.sagepub.com/content/9/4/315. Last Accessed 25th June 2012
  5. IDRC (1997) Urban water management in developing countries: research priorities, water supply and sanitation collaborative council, Oslo, Norway, p 15Google Scholar
  6. Kachenje YE (2017) Institutional coordination in municipal services delivery: the case of water supply in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Dar es Salaam, p 408Google Scholar
  7. Kadushin C (2004) Introduction to social network theory, Chapter 2: some basic network concepts and propositions, http://www.communityanalytics.com/Portals/0/Resource_Library/Social%20Network%20Theory_Kadushin.pdf. Last Accessed 14th June 2012
  8. Kombe WJ, Kyessi AG (2008) Measuring service delivery in Southern Africa project: Socio-political dynamics of service delivery report. Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, p 114Google Scholar
  9. Kombe WJ, Ndezi T (2015) Water justice city profile: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, DPU, UCL, http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/water-justice. Last Accessed 25th Mar 2016
  10. Konteh R (2000) Enhancing community development in Sierra Leone. The need for coordination. Doctoral thesis, SPRING Centre, University of Dortmund, p 146Google Scholar
  11. Kyessi AG (2002) Community participation in urban infrastructure provision, servicing informal settlement in Dar es Salaam. Doctoral thesis, SPRING Centre, University of Dortmund, p 405Google Scholar
  12. Makurira H, Mugumo M (2003) Water sector reforms in Zimbabwe: the importance of policy and institutional coordination. A paper in the proceedings of the African regional workshop, Nairobi, Kenya, 8–10 Oct 2003, FAO, Rome, pp 158–167Google Scholar
  13. Malone T, Crowston K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput Surv 26(1):87–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mason M (2010) Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews (63 paragraphs). Forum: Qual Soc Res 11(3), Art. 8, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387. Last Accessed 17th Nov 2015
  15. North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Philippe M (2009) Public-private partnerships for urban water utilities: a review of experiences in developing Countries. The World Bank, Washington, p 191Google Scholar
  17. Triche T (2012) A case study of public-private and public-public partnerships in water supply and sewerage services in Dar Es Salaam. World Bank, Washington, p 74Google Scholar
  18. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) (2003) Water and sanitation in the world’s cities, ch.5, changing perspectives and roles in urban water and sanitation provision: privatization and beyond. Routledge, London, pp 158–192Google Scholar
  19. URT (2005) Decentralization for service delivery in Tanzania. A paper presented by D.M.S. Mmari, permanent secretary, PO- RALG, URT at the conference on Building capacity for the education sector in Africa, Oslo, Norway, 12th–14th Oct 2005, p 30Google Scholar
  20. WSP and Consumers International (2004) Moving from protest to proposal: Building the capacity of consumer organizations to engage in urban water supply and sanitation sector reform in Africa. Consumers International and WSP, Harare, pp 1–23Google Scholar
  21. WaterAid (2008) Why did city water fail? The rise and fall of private sector participation in Dar es Salaam’s water supply, online version http://www.wateraid.org/. Last Accessed 22nd Nov 2015

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Human Settlement Studies (IHSS), Ardhi UniversityDar es SalaamTanzania

Personalised recommendations