Advertisement

AuCu Nanoparticles Applied on Heterogeneous Catalysis: Studies About the Stability of Nanoparticles Under Redox Pre-treatments and Application in CO Oxidation Reaction

  • Priscila DestroEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

Catalysis is an important area of great scientific and economic interest and in order to better understand the processes involved became essential the use of model catalysts with well defined properties. This Chapter presents AuCu nanoparticles with well defined size and composition supported and applied in the CO oxidation reaction. The results have proved the fundamental effect of the support as a driving force that leads to the formation of different types of metal-oxide interface, aspects that may be extremely relevant for catalysis and other areas where a well-defined interface is required.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnston RL (2012) Metal nanoparticles and nanoalloys. In: Frontiers of nanoscience, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Somorjai GA, Park JY (2008) Colloid science of metal nanoparticle catalysts in 2D and 3D structures. Challenges of nucleation, growth, composition, particle shape, size control and their influence on activity and selectivity. Topics Catal 49:126–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-008-9077-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2005) Catalysis with transition metal nanoparticles in colloidal solution: nanoparticle shape dependence and stability. J Phys Chem B 109:12663–12676.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp051066pCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Narayanan R, El-Sayed MA (2004) Shape-dependent catalytic activity of platinum nanoparticles in colloidal solution. Nano Lett 4:1343–1348.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl0495256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prieto PJS, Ferreira AP, Haddad PS et al (2010) Designing Pt nanoparticles supported on CeO2-Al2O3: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties in the steam reforming and partial oxidation of methane. J Catal 276:351–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.09.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ribeiro RU, Liberatori JWC, Winnishofer H et al (2009) Colloidal Co nanoparticles supported on SiO2: synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties for steam reforming of ethanol. Appl Catal B Environ 91:670–678.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bonnemann H, Richards RM (2001) Nanoscopic metal particles—synthetic methods and potential applications. Eur J Inorg Chem 2455–2480.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0682
  8. 8.
    Mourdikoudis S, Liz-Marzán LM (2013) Oleylamine in nanoparticle synthesis. Chem Mater 25:1465–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jia C-J, Schüth F (2011) Colloidal metal nanoparticles as a component of designed catalyst. Phys Chem Chem Phys PCCP 13:2457–2487.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp02680hCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Somorjai GA, Tao F, Park JY (2008) The nanoscience revolution: merging of colloid science, catalysis and nanoelectronics. Topics Catal 47:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-007-9028-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun S, Murray CB, Weller D et al (2000) Monodisperse FePt nanoparticles and ferromagnetic FePt nanocrystal superlattices. Science 287:1989–1992.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5460.1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tao FF, Schneider WF, Kamat PV (2014) Chemical synthesis of nanoscale heterogeneous catalysis. In: Heterogeneous catalysis at the nanoscale for energy applications, pp 9–29Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sonström P, Bäumer M (2011) Supported colloidal nanoparticles in heterogeneous gas phase catalysis: on the way to tailored catalysts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:19270–19284.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp22048aCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pushkarev VV, Zhu Z, An K et al (2012) Monodisperse metal nanoparticle catalysts: synthesis, characterizations, and molecular studies under reaction conditions. Topics Catal 55:1257–1275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-012-9915-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munnik P, de Jongh PE, de Jong KP (2015) Recent developments in the synthesis of supported catalysts. Chemical reviews.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500486uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Na K, Zhang Q, Somorjai GA (2014) Colloidal metal nanocatalysts: synthesis, characterization, and catalytic applications. J Clust Sci 25:83–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10876-013-0636-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li D, Wang C, Tripkovic D et al (2012) Surfactant removal for colloidal nanoparticles from solution synthesis: the effect on catalytic performance. ACS Catal 2:1358–1362.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300219jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blavo SO, Qayyum E, Baldyga LM et al (2013) Verification of organic capping agent removal from supported colloidal synthesized pt nanoparticle catalysts. Topics Catal 56:1835–1842.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-013-0120-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang W, Hua Q, Cao T (2014) Influence and removal of capping ligands on catalytic colloidal nanoparticles. Catal Lett 144:1355–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-014-1306-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niu Z, Li Y (2014) Removal and utilization of capping agents in nanocatalysis. Chem Mater 26:72–83.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm4022479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lopez-sanchez JA, Dimitratos N, Hammond C et al (2011) Facile removal of stabiliser-ligands from supported gold nanoparticles, pp 27–59.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bartholomew CH (2001) Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl Catal A Gen 212:17–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00843-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gracia FJ, Miller JT, Kropf AJ, Wolf EE (2002) Kinetics, FTIR, and controlled atmosphere EXAFS study of the effect of chlorine on Pt-supported catalysts during oxidation reactions. J Catal 209:341–354.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oh HS, Yang JH, Costello CK et al (2002) Selective catalytic oxidation of CO: effect of chloride on supported Au catalysts. J Catal 210:375–386.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dai S, You Y, Zhang S et al (2017) In situ atomic-scale observation of oxygen driven core-shell formation in Pt3Co nanoparticles. Nat Commun 8:204.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00161-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mayrhofer KJJ, Juhart V, Hartl K et al (2009) Adsorbate-induced surface segregation for core-shell nanocatalysts. Angew Chem 48:3529–3531.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200806209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kitchin JR, Reuter K, Scheffler M (2008) Alloy surface segregation in reactive environments: first-principles atomistic thermodynamics study of Ag3 Pd(111) in oxygen atmospheres. Phys Rev B 77:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dai S, Hou Y, Onoue M et al (2017) Revealing surface elemental composition and dynamic processes involved in facet-dependent oxidation of Pt3CO nanoparticles via in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett 17:4683–4688.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhan W, Wang J, Wang H et al (2017) Crystal structural effect of AuCu alloy nanoparticles on catalytic CO oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 139:8846–8854.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b01784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li X, Chen Q, McCue I et al (2014) Dealloying of noble-metal alloy nanoparticles. Nano Lett 14:2569–2577.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500377gCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nassiri H, Lee KE, Hu Y et al (2017) Water shifts PdO-catalyzed lean methane combustion to Pt-catalyzed rich combustion in Pd–Pt catalysts: In situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Catal 352:649–656.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2017.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liu X, Wang A, Li L et al (2011) Structural changes of Au-Cu bimetallic catalysts in CO oxidation: in situ XRD, EPR, XANES, and FT-IR characterizations. J Catal 278:288–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yin J, Shan S, Yang L et al (2012) Gold-Copper nanoparticles: nanostructural evolution and bifunctional catalytic sites. Chem Mater 24:4662–4674.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm302097cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abad A, Almela C, Corma A, García H (2006) Efficient chemoselective alcohol oxidation using oxygen as oxidant. Superior performance of gold over palladium catalysts. Tetrahedron 62:6666–6672.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2006.01.118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Prieto PJS, Ferreira AP, Haddad PS et al (2010) Designing Pt nanoparticles supported on CeO2-Al2O3: synthesis, characterization and catalytic properties in the steam reforming and partial oxidation of methane. J Catal 276:351–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.09.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bauer JC, Mullins DR, Oyola Y et al (2013) Structure activity relationships of silica supported AuCu and AuCuPd alloy catalysts for the oxidation of CO. Catal Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-013-1075-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Comotti M, Li W-C, Spliethoff B, Schüth F (2005) Support effect in high activity gold catalysts for CO oxidation. J Am Chem Soc 128:917–924.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0561441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baldizzone C, Gan L, Hodnik N et al (2015) Stability of dealloyed porous Pt/Ni nanoparticles. ACS Catal 5000–5007.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b01151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Divins NJ, Angurell I, Escudero C et al (2014) Influence of the support on surface rearrangements of bimetallic nanoparticles in real catalysts. Science 346:620–623.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang L, Shan S, Loukrakpam R et al (2012) Role of support-nanoalloy interactions in the atomic-scale structural and chemical ordering for tuning catalytic sites. J Am Chem Soc 134:15048–15060.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3060035CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang L, Kim HY, Henkelman G (2013) CO oxidation at the Au–Cu interface of bimetallic nanoclusters supported on CeO2(111). J Phys Chem Lett 4:2943–2947.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jz401524dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Guisbiers G, Mejia-Rosales S, Khanal S et al (2014) Gold–Copper nano-alloy, “Tumbaga”, in the era of nano: phase diagram and segregation. Nano Lett 14:6718–6726.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503584qCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Okamoto H, Chakrabarti DJ, Laughlin DE, Massalski TB (1987) The Au-Cu (Gold-Copper) system. Bull Alloy Phase Diagr 454–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Oh HS, Yang JH, Costello CK et al (2002) Selective catalytic oxidation of CO: effect of chloride on supported Au catalysts. J Catal 210:375–386.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Broqvist P, Molina LM, Grönbeck H, Hammer B (2004) Promoting and poisoning effects of Na and Cl coadsorption on CO oxidation over MgO-supported Au nanoparticles. J Catal 227:217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2004.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cant NW, Angove DE, Patterson JM (1998) The effects of residual chlorine on the behaviour of platinum group metals for oxidation of different hydrocarbons. Catal Today 44:93–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(98)00177-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kim S-I, Eom G, Kang M et al (2015) Composition-selective fabrication of ordered intermetallic Au–Cu nanowires and their application to nano-size electrochemical glucose detection. Nanotechnology 26:245702.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/24/245702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Najafishirtari S, Brescia R, Guardia P et al (2015) Nanoscale transformations of alumina-supported AuCu ordered phase nanocrystals and their activity in CO oxidation. ACS Catal 5:2154–2163.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cs501923xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bauer JC, Mullins D, Li M et al (2011) Synthesis of silica supported AuCu nanoparticle catalysts and the effects of pretreatment conditions for the CO oxidation reaction. Phys Chem Chem Phys PCCP 13:2571–2581.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp01859gCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ravel B, Newville M (2005) ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J Synchrotron Radiat 12:537–541.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049505012719CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Grunes LA (1983) Study of the K edges of 3d transition metals in pure and oxide form by X-ray-absorption spectroscopy. Phys Rev B 27:2111–2131.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.27.2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kuhn M, Sham TK (1994) Charge redistribution and electronic behavior in a series of Au-Cu alloys. Phys Rev B 49:1647–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim HY, Henkelman G (2013) CO oxidation at the interface of au nanoclusters and the stepped-CeO2(111) surface by the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism. J Phys Chem Lett 4:216–221.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jz301778bCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Liu D, Zhu YF, Jiang Q (2015) DFT study of CO oxidation on Cu2O–Au interfaces at Au–Cu Alloy surfaces. RSC Adv 5:1587–1597.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10881GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vecchietti J, Bonivardi A, Xu W et al (2014) Understanding the role of oxygen vacancies in the water gas shift reaction on ceria-supported platinum catalysts. ACS Catal 4:2088–2096.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cs500323uCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cargnello M, Doan-Nguyen VVT, Gordon TR et al (2013) Control of metal nanocrystal size reveals metal-support interface role for ceria catalysts. Science (New York, NY) 341:771–773.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Flynn PC, Wanke SE (1974) A model of supported metal catalyst sintering. II. Application of model. J Catal 34:400–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(74)90053-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hansen TW, Delariva AT, Challa SR, Datye AK (2013) Sintering of catalytic nanoparticles: particle migration or Ostwald ripening? Acc Chem Res 46:1720–1730.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar3002427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar)São CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations