Advertisement

The Impact of Natural Disasters on Individuals’ Choice Between Economic Growth and Environmental Protection: Empirical Evidence from the World Values Survey

  • Vladimir Udalov
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Climate Studies book series (BRIEFSCLIMATE)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to analyse the effect of natural disasters on individuals’ choice between economic growth and environmental protection. Combining the 2010–2014 wave of the World Values Survey with data on natural disasters from the International Disaster Database, the empirical results provide evidence that respondents from the high-income sub-sample who were affected by natural disasters are more likely to prefer economic growth. However, natural disasters increase the impact of environmental values on the choice between environmental protection and economic growth. As for the low-income sub-sample, natural disasters have no effect on either the choice between economic growth and environmental protection or the relationship between environmental values and pro-environmental choice. This empirical result suggests that individuals in the low-income sub-sample might not causally attribute their experience of extreme weather events to climate change.

Keywords

Environmental behaviour Environmental protection Economic growth Natural disasters World values survey International disaster database 

References

  1. Adebo, G. M. and Ajewole, O. C., 2012. “Gender and the Urban Environment: Analysis of Willingness to pay for Waste Management Disposal in Ekiti-State, Nigeria.” American International Journal of Contemporary Research 2(5).Google Scholar
  2. Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B. and Read, D., 1994. “What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models.” Risk Analysis 14(6), 959–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A. and Grover, H., 2008. “Examining the Relationship between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States.” Environment and Behavior 40 (1), 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassar, A., Healy, A. and von Kessler, C., 2017. “Trust, Risk, and Time Preferences After a Natural Disaster: Experimental Evidence from Thailand.” World Development 94, 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarc, C. F., Kotchen, M. J. and Moore, M. R., 2003. “Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behaviour: Participation in a green electricity program.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 23, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, C. M. and Chambers, S. M., 2005. “Psychology and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice.” Environment and Behavior 37(6), 640–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costa, D. L. and Kahn, M. E., 2013. “Energy Conservation “Nudges” and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11, 680–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CRED, 2015. “The Human Cost of Weather Related Disasters: 1995–2015.”Google Scholar
  9. Dai, J., Kesternich, M., Löschel, A. and Ziegler, A., 2014. “Do Chinese individuals believe in global climate change and why? An econometric analysis.” Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 28.Google Scholar
  10. Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., Wang, H. and Wheeler, D., 2002. “Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1), 147–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Den Butter, F. A. G. and Verbruggen, H., 1994. “Measuring the Trade-Off between Economic Growth and a Clean Environment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 4(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diekmann, A. and Franzen, A., 1999. “The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern.” Environment and Behavior 31, 540–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorsch, M. T., 2014. “Economic Development and Determinants of Environmental Concern.” Social Science Quarterly 95(4).Google Scholar
  14. Drews, S., Antal, M. and van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., 2018. “Challenges in Assessing Public Opinion on Economic Growth Versus Environment: Considering European and US Data.” Ecological Economics 146, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunlap, R. E. and Van Liere, K. D., 1978. “The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results.” The Journal of Environmental Education 9(4), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. and Jones, R. E., 2000. “Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egan, P. J. and Mullin, M., 2012. ‘Turning Personal Experience into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming.’ Journal of Politics 74(3), 796–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrier, B. A. and Spickett, J. T., 2007. “Natural disasters in developing countries: an environmental health perspective.” Asia Pacific Journal of public Health 19, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franzen, A. and Meyer, R., 2010. “Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000.” European Sociological Review 26, 219–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franzen, A. and Vogl, D., 2013. “Acquiescence and the Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection: A Comparison of the ISSP, WVS, and EVS.” Social Science Quarterly 94(3), 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B., 1995. “Economic Growth and the environment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guimaraes, P., Hefner, F. and Woodward, D., 1993. “Wealth and income effects of natural disasters: An econometric analysis.” Review of Regional Studies 23, 97–114.Google Scholar
  23. Hage, O., Söderholm, P. and Berglund, C., 2009. “Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: Empirical evidence from Sweden.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallegatte, S. and Dumas, P., 2009. “Can natural disasters have positive consequences? Investigating the role of embodies technical change.” Ecological Economics 68(3), 777–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansla, A., Gamble, A., Juliusson, A. and Gärling, T., 2008. “Psychological Determinants of Attitude towards and Willingness to Pay for Green Electricity.” Energy Policy 36: 768–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IMF, 2014. “Proposed new grouping in WEO country classifications: Low-income developing countries.” IMF Policy Paper.Google Scholar
  27. Inglehart, R., 1971. “The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies.” American Political Science Review 65, 991–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Inglehart, R., 1995. “Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies.” Political Science and Politics 28, 57–72.Google Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R., 1997. “Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies.” Princeton, NJ: University press.Google Scholar
  30. Israel, D. and Levinson, A., 2004. “Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality: Testable Empirical Implications of the Growth and Environmental Literature.” The Berkely Electronic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Klomp, J. and Valckx, K., 2014. “Natural disasters and economic growth: A meta-analysis.” Global Environmental Change 26(1), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozluk, T. and Zipperer, V., 2014. “Environmental policies and productivity growth – a critical review of empirical findings. “OECD Journal: Economic Studies 2014.Google Scholar
  33. Lazzaroni, S. and van Bergeijk, P., 2014. “Natural disasters’ impact, factors of resilience and development: A meta-analysis of the macroeconomic literature.” Ecological Economics 107, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G. and Howe, P., 2012. “Extreme weather and global climate change in the American mind”, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, Yale Project on Global Climate Change Communication.Google Scholar
  35. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., Rosenthal, S., Marlon, J. and Howe, P., 2014. “Extreme weather and global climate change in the American mind.”, Yale University and George Mason University, New Haven, CT, Yale Project on Global Climate Change Communication.Google Scholar
  36. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L., 2007. “Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications.” Global Environmental Change 17, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDermott, T., 2012. “The Effects of Natural Disasters on Human Capital Accumulation.” IIIS Discussion Paper 391.Google Scholar
  38. Ménioux, J. and Zumsteeg, S., 2012. “Individual perceptions of climate risks: SURVEY AXA/IPSOS.”Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, R. and Liebe, U., 2010. “Are the affluent prepared to pay for the planet? Explaining willingness to pay for public and quasi-private environmental goods in Switzerland.” Population and Environment 32, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murphy, R., 1994. “Rationality and Nature: A Sociological Inquiry into a Changing Relationship.” Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  41. Neumayer, E. and Plümper, T., 2008. “The Gendered Nature of Natural Disasters: The Impact of Catastrophic Events on the Gender Gap in Life Expectancy, 1981–2002.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 97(3), 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Norton, E., Wang, H. and Ai, C., 2004. “Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models.” STATA Journal 4, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Noy, I., 2009. “The Macroeconomic Consequences of Disasters.” Journal of Development Economics 88(2), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peterson, T. C., Scott, P. A. and Herring, S., 2012. “Explaining Extreme Events of 2011 from a Climate Perspective.” American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
  45. Raddatz, C., 2007. “Are External Shocks Responsible for the Instability of Output in Low-Income Countries?” Journal of Development Economics 84, 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rokeach, M., 1973. “The nature of human values.” New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Running, K., 2012. “Examining Environmental Concern in Developed, Transitioning and Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Test of the Objective Problems and the Subjective Values Explanations.” World Values Research 5(1), 2012.Google Scholar
  48. Schneider, F., Kallis, G., and Martinez-Alier, J., 2010. “Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18(6), 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwartz, S. H., 1977. “Normative influences on altruism.” In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 10, 221–279.Google Scholar
  50. Schwartz, S. H., 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values”, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1).Google Scholar
  51. Schwartz, S. H. and Howard, J. A., 1981. “A normative decision-making model of altruism.” In J. P. Ruston and R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 189–211.Google Scholar
  52. Steg, L. and Vlek, C., 2009. “Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stern, P. C., 2000. “Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stern, P. C. and Dietz, T., 1994. “The value basis of environmental concern.’ Journal of Social Issues 50(3), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T. and Guagnano, G. A., 1995. “The new ecological paradigm in social psychological context.” Environment and Behavior 27, 723–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. and Kalof, L., 1999. “A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism.” Research in Human Ecology 6(2), 81–97.Google Scholar
  57. Strömberg, D., 2007. “Natural Disasters, Economic Development, and Humanitarian Aid.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21(3), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. UNISDR, 2015. “The Human Cost of Weather Related Disasters.”Google Scholar
  59. Van der Linden, S., 2015. “The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 41, 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Feinberg, G. and Maibach, E., 2014. “How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plan facts, pie charts or metaphors?” Climatic Change 126(1–2), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitmarsh, L., 2008. “Are flood victims more concerned about global climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioral response.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (3), 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. and Aldrich, C., 2000. “Elaborating on gender Differences in Environmentalism.” Journal of Social Issues 56 (3), 443–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Udalov
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations