Measuring Extremism: Validating an Alt-Right Twitter Accounts Dataset

  • Joshua Thorburn
  • Javier TorregrosaEmail author
  • Ángel Panizo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11315)


Twitter is one of the most commonly used Online Social Networks in the world and it has consequently attracted considerable attention from different political groups attempting to gain influence. Among these groups is the alt-right; a modern far-right extremist movement that gained notoriety in the 2016 US presidential election and the infamous Charlottesville Unite the Right rally. This article details the process used to create a database on Twitter of users associated with this movement, allowing for empirical research into this extremist group to be undertaken. In short, Twitter accounts belonging to leaders and groups associated with the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville were used to create this database. After compiling users who followed these leading alt-right figures, an initial sample was gathered (n = 549). This sample was then validated by two researchers. This involved using a scoring method created for this process, in order to eliminate any accounts that were not supportive of the alt-right. Finally, a total amount of 422 accounts were found to belong to followers of this extremist movement, with a total amount of 123.295 tweets.


Extremism Far-right Twitter Alt-right White supremacy 


  1. 1.
    Peters, M.A.: Education in a post-truth world. In: Peters, M.A., Rider, S., Hyvönen, M., Besley, T. (eds.) post-truth. Fake News. Springer, Singapore (2018). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Southern Poverty Law Center: Alt-Right. Accessed 29 May 2018
  3. 3.
    Hine, G.E., et al.: Kek, Cucks, and God Emperor Trump: A Measurement Study of 4chan’s Politically Incorrect Forum and Its Effects on the Web. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03452 (2016)
  4. 4.
    Wendling, M.: Alt-right: From 4chan to the White House. Pluto Press, London (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kovaleski, S.F., Turkewitz, J., Goldstein, J., Barry, D.: An Alt-Right Makeover Shrouds the Swastikas. New York Times, 10 December 2016Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nagle, A.: Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. John Hunt Publishing, New Alresford (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strickland, P.: Alt-Right Weakened but not Dead After Charlottesville. Al Jazeera, 3 October 2017Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marantz, A.: The Alt-Right Branding War has Torn the Movement in Two. The New Yorker, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heim, J., Silverman, E., Shapiro, T.R., Brown, E.: One dead as car strikes crowds amid protests of white nationalist gathering in Charlottesville, two police die in helicopter crash. The Washington Post, 13 August 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anti-defamation League.: From Alt Right to Alt Lite: Naming the Hate. Accessed 29 May 2018
  11. 11.
    Olivia, S.: Alt-right retaliates against Twitter ban by creating fake black accounts. The Guardian, 17 November 2016Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fernandez, M., Asif, M., Alani, H.: Understanding the roots of radicalisation on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, pp. 1–10. ACM, May 2018Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen, K., Johansson, F., Kaati, L., Mork, J.C.: Detecting linguistic markers for radical violence in social media. Terrorism Polit. Violence 26(1), 246–256 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Thorburn
    • 1
  • Javier Torregrosa
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ángel Panizo
    • 3
  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Biological and Health Psychology DepartmentUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Computer Engineering DepartmentUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations