Advertisement

Secondary Teachers’ Learning: Measures of Variation

  • Susan A. PetersEmail author
  • Amy Stokes-Levine
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

This chapter describes results from a project to design and implement professional development for middle and high school mathematics teachers to investigate how dilemma, critical reflection, and rational discourse affect teachers’ understandings and reasoning about variation. Framed by transformative learning theory, this study highlights how teachers’ engagement with activities designed to prompt dilemma, consideration of multiple perspectives through multiple representations and rational discourse, and examination of premises underlying measures and procedures broadened teachers’ perspectives on measures of variation. This study contributes to teacher education by identifying circumstances conducive to deepening statistical understandings and supporting increasingly complex statistical reasoning.

Keywords

Mean absolute deviation Professional development Standard deviation Transformative learning theory Variation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number 1149403. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Biehler, R. (2007). Students’ strategies of comparing distributions in an exploratory data analysis context. In Proceedings of 56th Session of the International Statistical Institute. Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, M. E., Mayer, R. E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Reed, B. S., et al. (1997). Learning by understanding: The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 663–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, J. M., Kraut, G., Mathews, D., & Wimbish, J. (2007). The “fundamental theorem” of statistics: Classifying student understanding of basic statistical concepts. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, S. A., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2016). The incoming statistical knowledge of undergraduate majors in a department of mathematics and statistics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cranton, P. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. delMas, R., & Liu, Y. (2005). Exploring students’ conceptions of the standard deviation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 55–82.Google Scholar
  7. Finzer, W. (2002). Fathom dynamic data software [Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, C. A., Bargagliotti, A. E., Case, C. A., Kader, G. D., Scheaffer, R. L., & Spangler, D. A. (2015). Statistical education of teachers. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  9. Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, R., et al. (2007). Guidelines and assessment for instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre-K–12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  10. Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2005). A framework for teaching and assessing reasoning about variability. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 92–99.Google Scholar
  11. Garfield, J., delMas, R., & Chance, B. (2007). Using students’ informal notions of variability to develop an understanding of formal measures of variability. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 117–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Goodell, J. (2000). Learning to teach mathematics for understanding: The role of reflection. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2, 48–60.Google Scholar
  13. Goos, M., Dole, S., & Makar, K. (2007). Designing professional development to support teachers’ learning in complex environments. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 8, 23–47.Google Scholar
  14. Jacobbe, T., delMas, R., Haberstroh, J., & Hartlaub, B. (2011). LOCUS: Levels of conceptual understanding in statistics [Measurement instrument].Google Scholar
  15. Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration [Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lann, A., & Falk, R. (2003). What are the clues for intuitive assessment of variability? In C. Lee (Ed.), Reasoning about variability: A collection of research studies. Proceedings of the third international research forum on statistical reasoning, thinking, and literacy. Mount Pleasant: Central Michigan University.Google Scholar
  17. Lehrer, R., & Kim, M. J. (2009). Structuring variability by negotiating its measure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 116–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehrer, R., Kim, M. J., & Schauble, L. (2007). Supporting the development of conceptions of statistics by engaging students in measuring and modeling variability. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(3), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2005). “Variation-talk”: Articulating meaning in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 27–54.Google Scholar
  20. Mathews, D., & Clark, J. (2003). Successful students’ conceptions of mean, standard deviation, and the central limit theorem. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  21. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards in Mathematics. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  24. Peters, S. A. (2011). Robust understanding of statistical variation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 10(1), 52–88.Google Scholar
  25. Peters, S. A. (2014). Developing understanding of statistical variation: Secondary statistics teachers’ perceptions and recollections of learning factors. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(6), 539–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peters, S. A., & Kopeikin, K. S. (2016). Integrated reasoning about statistical variation: Secondary teachers’ development of foundational understandings. In D. Ben-Zvi & K. Makar (Eds.), The teaching and learning of statistics (pp. 249–259). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2004). Reasoning about variation. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 201–226). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roddick, C., Becker, J. R., & Pence, B. J. (2000). Capstone courses in problem solving for prospective secondary teachers: Effects on beliefs and teaching practices. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 97–104). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  29. Sánchez, E., Silva, C. B., & Coutinho, C. (2011). Teachers’ understanding of variation. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics—Challenges for teaching and teacher education: A joint ICMI/IASE study (pp. 211–221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (2nd ed., pp. 957–1009). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  31. Silva, C. B., & Coutinho, C. Q. S. (2008). Reasoning about variation of a univariate distribution: A study with secondary math teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (Eds.), Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008 IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey, Mexico: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction and the International Association for Statistical Education. Retrieved October 12, 2008, from http://www.ugr.es/~icmi/iase_study/.
  32. Smith, T. M., Desimone, L. M., & Ueno, K. (2005). “Highly qualified” to do what? The relationship between teacher quality mandates and the use of reform-oriented instruction in middle school mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sorto, M. A. (2004). Prospective middle school teachers’ knowledge about data analysis and its applications to teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, Lansing.Google Scholar
  34. Stohl, H. (2005). Probability in teacher education and development. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in schools: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 345–366). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, E. W. (1997). Building upon the theoretical debate: A critical review of the empirical studies of Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, E. W. (2000). Analyzing research on transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow and Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 285–328). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. The Concord Consortium. (2017). Common online data analysis platform (Version 2.0) [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://concord.org/.
  38. Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Watson, J. M., Callingham, R. A., & Kelly, B. A. (2007). Students’ appreciation of expectation and variation as a foundation for statistical understanding. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(2), 83–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2004a). Expectation versus variation: Students’ decision making in a chance environment. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 4(3), 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2004b). Statistical variation in a chance setting: A two-year study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watson, J. M., & Kelly, B. A. (2005). The winds are variable: Student intuitions about variation. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 252–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wild, C. J., Pfannkuch, M., & Regan, M. (2011). Towards more accessible conceptions of statistical inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 174(2), 247–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LouisvilleLouisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations