Advertisement

Critical Examination of the Role of STEM in Propagating and Maintaining Race and Gender Disparities

  • Deborah Faye CarterEmail author
  • Juanita E. Razo Dueñas
  • Rocío Mendoza
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research book series (HATR, volume 34)

Abstract

At a time when underrepresented and racial/ethnic populations in the U.S. are growing rapidly, it is critical to examine the historical roots of why they continue to be underrepresented in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields. This chapter reviews the literature regarding how race and racism have contributed to modern-day STEM cultures utilizing a conceptual framework guided by critical race theory and Hurtado, Alvarez, Guillermo-Wann, Cuellar and Arellano’s (2012) Model of Diverse Learning Environments. Science is a key contributor to the historical construction of racial differences, and this logic continues to the present day in the way merit is constructed and evaluated in STEM. The lack of progress toward substantially lessening gender and race disparities in many STEM fields can be partially attributed to the culture of the STEM academic fields. We draw connections between science’s role in the construction and application of race in society to the culture of STEM, which can feel exclusionary and isolating to underrepresented students. The chapter concludes with a discussion of interventions that have been shown to have an impact on the transformation of institutional (and disciplinary) cultures to better support the educational outcomes of underrepresented students.

Keywords

Meritocracy Merit Race Racism STEM Science Engineering Math Technology Educational achievement Educational attainment Degree attainment STEM culture Students of color Gender Underrepresented minority students 

References

  1. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/toolbox.pdf
  2. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(3), 539–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2007). Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. American Sociological Review, 72(4), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, M. A., & Jovanovic, J. (2017). The intersectional matrix: Rethinking institutional change for URM women in STEM. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(3), 216–231.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baez, B. (2006). Merit and difference. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 996–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banda, R. M., & Flowers III, A. M. (2017). Birds of a feather do not always flock together: A critical analysis of Latina engineers and their involvement in student organizations. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 16(4), 359–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banton, M. (2015). What we now know about race and ethnicity. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barker, D. G. (1967). The history of entrance examinations. Improving College and University Teaching, 15(4), 250–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1967.10532675 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barthelemy, R. S., McCormick, M., & Henderson, C. (2016). Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bejerano, A. R., & Bartosh, T. M. (2015). Learning masculinity: Unmasking the hidden curriculum in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 21(2), 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bellman, S., Burgstahler, S., & Hinke, P. (2015). Academic coaching: Outcomes from a pilot group of postsecondary STEM students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(1), 103–108.Google Scholar
  12. Bernal, D. D., & Villalpando, O. (2002). An apartheid of knowledge in academia: The struggle over the “Legitimate” knowledge of Faculty of Color. Equity & Excellence in Education: University of Massachusetts School of Education Journal, 35(2), 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bound, J., & Turner, S. (2002). Going to war and going to college: Did world war II and the G.I. Bill increase educational attainment for returning veterans? Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 784–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brandt, C. B. (2007). Epistemology and temporal/spatial orders in science education: A response to Aikenhead & Ogawa’s: Indigenous knowledge and science revisited. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 539–620.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-007-9067-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carnoy, M. (1994). Faded dreams: The politics and economics of race in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cech, E. A. (2010, June). Trained to disengage? A longitudinal study of social consciousness and public engagement among engineering students. In Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) National Conference. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  19. Cech, E. A. (2013). The (mis)framing of social justice: Why ideologies of depoliticization and meritocracy hinder engineers’ ability to think about social injustices. In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering education for social justice: Critical explorations and opportunities (Vol. 10). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564–596.  https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2011.0030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ path into and out of stem fields. National Center for Education Statistics, 2014–2011 http://doi.org/http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf
  22. Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(49).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
  23. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139.Google Scholar
  27. Danielsson, A. T. (2014). In the physics class: University physics students’ enactment of class and gender in the context of laboratory work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(2), 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dee, J. R., Henkin, A. B., & Hearne, J. L. (2011). Enabling initiative and enterprise: Faculty-led course redesign in a STEM discipline. Educational Research Quarterly, 35(1), 34–64.Google Scholar
  29. Diversity, Equity, & Inclusive Excellence. (2013). Association of American Colleges & Universities. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/resources/diversity-equity-and-inclusive-excellence
  30. Eddy, S. L., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellenberg, J. (2014). How not to be wrong. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Feagin, J. (1989). Racial and ethnic relations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.Google Scholar
  33. Fish, J. M. (2013). Understanding race and intelligence. In J. M. Fish (Ed.), Race and intelligence: Separating science from myth (pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Franklin, V. P. (2007). The tests are written for the dogs: “The Journal of Negro Education”, African American children, and the intelligence testing movement in historical perspective. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(3), 216–229 https://www.jstor.org/stable/40034566 Google Scholar
  35. Gillham, N. W. (2001). Sir Francis Galton and the birth of eugenics. Annual Review of Genetics, 35, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gonsalves, A. J., Danielsson, A., & Pettersson, H. (2016). Masculinities and experimental practices in physics: The view from three case studies. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993). The “racial” economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Harding, S. (2015). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(7), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 88(12), 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 614–631.Google Scholar
  43. Hausmann, L. R., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and white first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Herzig, A. H. (2004). Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 171–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hill, N. E., Jeffries, J. R., & Murray, K. P. (2017). New tools for old problems: Inequality and educational opportunity for ethnic minority youth and parents. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 674(1), 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hinsdale, M. J. (2015). Empathy blues at the colonial difference: Underrepresented undergraduate women in STEM. Philosophy of Education, 236–244.Google Scholar
  48. Howe, K. R. (2015). The meritocratic conception of educational equality: Ideal theory run amuck. Educational Theory, 65(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hrabowski III, F. A. (2014). Institutional change in higher education: Innovation and collaboration. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hrabowski III, F. A., & Maton, K. I. (2009). Change institutional culture, and you change who goes into science. Academe, 95(3), 11–15 Retrieved from: https://www.aaup.org/article/change-institutional-culture-and-you-change-who-goes-science?wbc_purpose=Basic&WBCMODE=PresentationUnpublished#.W0fJwthKi34 Google Scholar
  51. Hughes, B. E. (2018). Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students. Science Advances, 4(3), 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 41–122). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50, 189–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9114-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 7(4), 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Park, J., & Lopez, M. (2008). Training future scientists: Predicting first-year minority student participation in health science research. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 126–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s1073401701914. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hurtado, S., Han, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L., & Cerna, O. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Biomedical and behavioral science aspirants’ and minority students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841–887.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9051-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hurtado, S., Milem, J. F., Clayton-Pedersen, A., & Allen, W. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. Review of Higher Education, 21(3), 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hurtado, S., Milem, J. F., Clayton-Pedersen, A., & Allen, W. (1999). Enacting diverse learning environments: Improving the climate for racial/ethnic diversity in higher education institutions. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Series: George Washington University Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
  59. Hurtado, S., Newman, C. B., Tran, M. C., & Chang, M. J. (2010). Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jackson, J., & Weidman, N. (2004). Race, racism, and science: Social impact and interaction (Science and society). In Santa Barbara. CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  61. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H., & Cuevas, A. K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Johnson, D. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 336–346.  https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Johnson, J. M. (2016). Managing transitions, building bridges: An evaluation of a summer bridge program for African American scientists and engineers. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(2), 206–216.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-01-2016-0010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jones, C., & Shorter-Gooden, K. (2004). Shifting: The double lives of black women in America. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  65. Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen: The hidden history of admission and exclusion at Harvard, Yale and Princeton. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  66. Kendi, I. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. New York: Nation Books.Google Scholar
  67. Kirchgasler, C. (2018). True grit? Making a scientific object and pedagogical tool. American Educational Research Journal, 55, 693–720.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217752244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Laursen, S., Hunter, A., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  69. Lemann, N. (2000). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  70. Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L., et al. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4), 420–436.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317720186 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Liu, A. (2011). Unraveling the myth of meritocracy within the context of US higher education. Higher Education, 62(4), 383–397.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9394-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Locks, A. M., Hurtado, S., Bowman, N. A., & Oseguera, L. (2008). Extending notions of campus climate and diversity to students’ transition to college. The Review of Higher Education, 31(3), 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976, April). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  75. Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485–510.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Massey, D. S., & Mooney, M. (2007). The effects of America’s three affirmative action programs on academic performance. Social Problems, 54(1), 99–117.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.99 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424–437.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Maton, K. I., & Hrabowski III, F. A. (2004). Increasing the number of African American PhDs in the sciences and engineering: A strengths-based approach. American Psychologist, 59(6), 547–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Maton, K. I., Pollard, S. A., McDougall Weise, T. V., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2012). Meyerhoff scholars program: A strengths-based, institution-wide approach to increasing diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 79, 610–623.  https://doi.org/10.1002/MSJ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Maxwell, E. (2008). Picture imperfect: Photography and eugenics 1870–1940. Eastbourne, UK, Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  81. Mazuzan, G.T. (1994). The national science foundation: A brief history. Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/nsf50/nsf8816.jsp
  82. McCoy, D. L., Luedke, C. L., & Winkle-Wagner, R. (2017). Encouraged or weeded out: Perspectives of students of color in the STEM disciplines on faculty interactions. Journal of College Student Development, 58(5), 657–673.  https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  84. McDonough, P. M., Korn, J. S., & Yamasaki, E. (1997). Access, equity, and the privatization of college counseling. The Review of Higher Education, 20(3), 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. McGee, E. O., & Bentley, L. (2017). The equity ethic: Black and Latinx college students reengineering their STEM careers toward justice. American Journal of Education, 124(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. McGee, E. O., & Martin, D. B. (2011). “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. McGee, E. O., & Stovall, D. (2015). Reimagining critical race theory in education: Mental health, healing, and the pathway to liberatory praxis. Educational Theory, 65(5), 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Menchaca, M. (1997). Early racist discourses: Roots of deficit thinking). In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 13–40). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  89. Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V. J., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students’ college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 896–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Museus, S. D., & Maramba, D. C. (2011). The impact of culture on Filipino American students’ sense of belonging. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Museus, S. D., Palmer, R. T., Davis, R. J., & Maramba, D. (2011). Racial and ethnic minority student success in STEM education, ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 36, Number 6. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  92. National Academy of Science, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, D.C: The National Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/12984 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. National Science Board. (2018). Science and Engineering Indicators 2018. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB-2018-1) Retrieved from: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/higher-education-in-science-and-engineering/highlights Google Scholar
  94. Nieves Delgado, A. (2018). Science, politics and the production of biological knowledge: New trends and old challenges. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 2(2), 467–473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-018-9406-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Nnadozie, E., Ishiyama, J., & Chon, J. (2001). Undergraduate research internships and graduate school success. Journal of College Student Development, 42(2), 145–156.Google Scholar
  96. Núñez, A.-M. (2009). Latino students’ transitions to college: A social and intercultural capital perspective. Harvard Educational Review, 79(1), 22–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2015). Racial formation in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  98. Ong, M., Smith, J. M., & Ko, L. T. (2018). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Orfield, G., & Ee, J. (2017, September 27). Tough choices facing Florida’s governments: Patterns of resegregation in Florida’s schools. The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derecho Civiles. A report for the LeRoy Collins Institute, Florida State University. Retrieved from https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/patterns-of-resegregation-in-floridas-schools/LCI-Tough-Choices-Patterns-of-Resegregation_FINAL.pdf
  101. Ovink, S. M., & Veazey, B. D. (2011). More than “getting us through:” a case study in cultural capital enrichment of underrepresented minority undergraduates. Research in Higher Education, 52(4), 370–394.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9198-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Patel, L. (2014). Countering coloniality in educational research: From ownership to answerability. Educational Studies, 50(4), 357–377.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.924942 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Porter, J. W. (2017). A “precious minority”: Constructing the “gifted” and “academically talented” student in the era of Brown v. Board of Education and the National Defense Education Act. Isis, 108(3), 581–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rincón, B. E., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2016). Examining department climate for women in engineering: The role of STEM interventions. Journal of College Student Development, 57(6), 742–747.  https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2016.0072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Robinson, W. H., McGee, E. O., Bentley, L. C., Houston, S. L., & Botchway, P. K. (2016). Addressing negative racial and gendered experiences that discourage academic careers in engineering. Computing in Science & Engineering, 18(2), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Rodriguez, I., Potvin, G., & Kramer, L. H. (2016). How gender and reformed introductory physics impacts student success in advanced physics courses and continuation in the physics major. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Roksa, J., Grodsky, E., Arum, R., & Gamoran, A. (2007). United States: Changes in higher education and social stratification. In Y. Shavit, R. Arum, & A. Gamoran (Eds.), Stratification in higher education: A comparative study., (Studies in social inequality) (pp. 165–191). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Rolin, K. (2004). Why gender is a relevant factor in the social epistemology of scientific inquiry. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 880–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rosa, K., & Mensah, F. M. (2016). Educational pathways of black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Russell, M. L., & Russell, J. A. (2015). Black American undergraduate women at a PWI: Switching majors in STEM. Negro Educational Review, 66(1/4), 1–28.Google Scholar
  112. Sallee, M. W. (2011). Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Samson, F. L. (2013). Multiple group threat and malleable white attitudes towards academic merit. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10(1), 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Schaeffer, B. (2018, January 10) ACT/SAT Test-Optional List Tops 1,000 Colleges, Universities. Retrieved June 1, 2018, from http://www.fairtest.org/actsat-testoptional-list-tops-1000-colleges-univer
  115. Sen, A. (2000). Merit and justice. In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlaf (Eds.), Meritocracy and economic inequality (pp. 5–16). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Seron, C., Silbey, S., Cech, E., & Rubineau, B. (2018). “I am not a feminist, but...”: Hegemony of a meritocratic ideology and the limits of critique among women in engineering. Work and Occupations, 45(2), 131–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  118. Shavit, Y., Arum, R., & Gamoran, A. (2007). Stratification in higher education: A comparative study (Studies in social inequality). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  119. Smedley, A. (2002). Science and the idea of race: A brief history. In J. M. Fish (Ed.), Race and intelligence: Separating science from Myth (pp. 145–176). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum http://site.ebrary.com/id/10477469 Google Scholar
  120. Smedley, A. (2013). Science and the idea of race: A brief history. In J. M. Fish (Ed.), Race and intelligence: Separating science from myth (pp. 145–176). New York: Routledge ebook ISBN 9781135651794.Google Scholar
  121. Smedley, A., & Smedley, B. D. (2011). Race in North America: Origin and evolution of a worldview. Boulder, CO: Routledge.Google Scholar
  122. Smith, J. L., Cech, E., Metz, A., Huntoon, M., & Moyer, C. (2014). Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Solórzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73.Google Scholar
  124. Solórzano, D. G. (1998). Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 121–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Suzuki, L. A., Short, E. L., & Lee, C. S. (2011). Racial and ethnic group differences in intelligence in the United States: Multicultural perspectives. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 273–292). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Tamborini, C. R., Kim, C., & Sakamoto, A. (2015). Education and lifetime earnings in the United States. Demography, 52(4), 1383–1407.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0407-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  129. Traxler, A. L., Cid, X. C., Blue, J., & Barthelemy, R. (2016). Enriching gender in physics education research: A binary past and a complex future. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Valencia, R. (1997a). Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking. In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 1–12). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  131. Valencia, R. (1997b). Genetic pathology model of deficit thinking. In R. Valencia (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 41–112). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  132. Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students. Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: London.Google Scholar
  133. Wilder, C. S. (2013). Ebony and ivy: Race, slavery, and the troubled history of America’s universities. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  134. Williams Pichon, H. (2016). Descubriendo mi lugar: Understanding sense of belonging and community of black STEM-H students enrolled at a Hispanic serving institution. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(2), 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., et al. (2015). Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 750–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Xie, Y., Fang, M., & Shauman, K. (2015). STEM education. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 331–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose cultural capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity, and Education, 8, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Yosso, T. J., Smith, W. A., Ceja, M., & Solórzano, D. (2009). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate for Latina/o undergraduates. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 659–786.  https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.4.m6867014157m707l CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Zack, N. (2014). Philosophy of science and race. Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=1679724 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Faye Carter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juanita E. Razo Dueñas
    • 1
  • Rocío Mendoza
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Educational StudiesClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontUSA

Personalised recommendations