Feasibility and Evaluation of Precision Farming

  • Latief Ahmad
  • Syed Sheraz Mahdi


Precision farming is characterized by a number of sophisticated tools that assist in monitoring variation and managing inputs. Majority of farms in India are rain-fed, and with the change of weather patterns, availability of rainwater is very unpredictable. Hence the nonavailability of inputs and labor on time is the biggest stumbling block to increase productivity of farms and remuneration. PA can help in this matter. In India precision farming is still at a very nascent stage although it is very much in practice in developed countries. In India more than 57.8% of operational holdings have size less than 1 ha. However, in the major agricultural states of Punjab, Rajasthan, Haryana, and Gujarat, more than 20% of agricultural lands have operational holding size of more than 4 ha. But there are many constraints that are limiting adoption of site-specific crop management in Indian states like culture and perception of users, land fragmentation and small farm size, high initial costs, knowledge and technical gaps, lack of success stories, climatic aberrations, poor connectivity in rural areas, high energy demands, lack of local technical expertise, etc. This chapter focuses on feasibility of precision farming, the problems faced during adoption of precision farming techniques, and the potential in India. A section on feasibility in Jammu and Kashmir state has also been included.

In this chapter the economics and profitability of precision farming technologies are also analyzed. Rapid socioeconomic changes in some developing countries, including India, are creating new scopes for application of precision agriculture (PA).


Capital expenditures Economics Feasibility Constraints Profitability Environmental benefits 


  1. Berry, J. K., Detgado, J. A., Khosla, R., & Pierce, F. J. (2003). Precision conservation for environmental sustainability. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 58(6), 332–339.Google Scholar
  2. Bonabana-Wabbi J. (2002). Assessing factors affecting adoption of agricultural technologies: The case of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Kumi District. Msc. Thesis Eastern Uganda.Google Scholar
  3. Dugad, S. V., & Sudhakar, M. S. (2006). Application of information technology in irrigated agriculture. In Proceedings of 19th national convention of agricultural engineers on role of information technology in high-tech agriculture and horticulture, Bangalore, India (pp. 197–202).Google Scholar
  4. Feder, G., & O’Mara, G. T. (1981). Farm size and the diffusion of green revolution technology. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 30(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33(2), 255–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1995). Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6), 1176–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harper, J. K., Rister, M. E., Mjelde, J. W., Drees, B. M., & Way, M. O. (1990). Factors influencing the adoption of insect management technology. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(4), 997–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jennings, G. (2005). Calculating the costs of precision ag. Grain Business (pp. 16–17).Google Scholar
  9. Lavison, R. (2013). Factors influencing the adoption of organic fertilizers in vegetable production in Accra. Msc Thesis, Accra Ghana.Google Scholar
  10. National Research Council. (1997). Precision agriculture in the 21st century: Geospatial and information technologies in crop management. Washington, DC: Nationl Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Patil, V. C., & Shanwad, U. K. (2009, December). Relevance of precision farming to Indian agriculture. In Second national conference on agro-informatics and precision farming.Google Scholar
  12. Pindyck, R. S. (1988). Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm. American Economic Review, 78(5), 969–985.Google Scholar
  13. Sangwan, S. S. (2015). More credit for agricultural households? NSSO’s 70th Round on indebtedness. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(16), 23–24.Google Scholar
  14. Schimmelpfennig, D., & Ebel, R. (2016). Sequential adoption and cost savings from precision agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 41(1), 97–115.Google Scholar
  15. Schultz, T. W. (1975). The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(3), 827–846.Google Scholar
  16. Swinton, S. M., & Lowenberg-DeBoer, J. (1998). Evaluating the profitability of site-specific farming. Journal of Production Agriculture, 11(4), 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thrikawala, S., Weersink, A., Fox, G., & Kachanoski, G. (1999). Economic feasibility of variable-rate technology for nitrogen on corn. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81(4), 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Latief Ahmad
    • 1
  • Syed Sheraz Mahdi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of AgronomySher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of KashmirSrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations