Advertisement

Strategic Planning in Local Public Administration: The Case of Romania

  • Călin Emilian HințeaEmail author
  • Marius Constantin Profiroiu
  • Tudor Cristian Țiclău
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

Strategic planning is an excellent tool that local governments can use to increase effectiveness of the governance process. Although Romania experienced more than four decades of national planning under the communist regime, after 1989 local authorities had major difficulties in using planning as an effective managerial tool. Access to the European Union (EU) meant significant changes, including a new approach for community development, where strategic planning has an essential role. Our main objective with this research is twofold: to analyze (1) why local authorities resort to planning and (2) how local authorities use strategic planning (characteristics of the process, results, main challenges, benefits). Our analysis indicates that more than two-thirds of local authorities are motivated by the EU funding possibilities, for which having a strategic plan is a mandatory condition. Results show that authorities have limited planning capacity, with stakeholder engagement and monitoring and evaluation being major challenges. We highlight specific details of the process through two case studies meant to offer a more comprehensive understanding of the particularities of planning in Romania, at local level.

Keywords

Cluj-Napoca Baraolt Strategic planning Local governance Administrative reform Public management reform Good practice 

References

  1. Cristea, M., Mare, C., Moldovan, C., China, A.-M., Farole, T., Vințan, A., Park, J., Garrett, K. P., & Ionescu-Heroiu, M. (2017). Magnet cities: Migration and commuting in Romania. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/327451497949480572/Magnet-cities-migration-and-commuting-in-Romania. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deletant, D. (2010). România sub regimul comunist (3rd ed.). București: Fundația Academică Civică.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2013). Quality of life in cities. Perception survey in 79 European cities. Flash Eurobarometer 366. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/urban/survey2013_en.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
  4. European Commission. (2015). Quality of life in European cities, Flash Eurobarometer 419. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/urban/survey2015_en.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
  5. Gârboan, R. (2007). Evaluation culture and capacity in Romanian public institutions at regional and local level, 2007. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 21E, 47–60.Google Scholar
  6. Gârboan, R., & Șandor, D. (2007). Evaluation culture and capacity in Romanian public institutions’. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 19E, 71–78.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, R. A. (2004). Political culture in post-Ceaușescu Romania. In H. F. Carey (Ed.), Romania since 1989. Politics, economics and society (pp. 215–226). New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Hințea, C. E. (2011). Reform and management in Romania. Strategy and structural change. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 34, 177–196.Google Scholar
  9. Hințea, C. E., & Țiclău, T. (2017). Public administration reform in Romania after 25 years. In K. Polonca & M. Bileisis (Eds.), Public administration reforms in Eastern European Union member states. Post-accession convergence and divergence (pp. 389–427). Vilnius: Mikolas Romeris University, Institute of Public Administration of Mykolas Romeris University.Google Scholar
  10. Hințea, C. E., Profiroiu, M. C., & Țiclău, T. C. (2015). Strategic planning and public management reform: The case of Romania, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue 2015, 30–44.Google Scholar
  11. IRES. (2016). România – societate cu încredere limitată. Raport de cercetare. http://www.ires.com.ro/uploads/articole/ires_criza-de-incredere-perceptii-si-reprezentari_sinteza_ianuarie-2016.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  12. Mungiu-Pipidi, A., Ioniță S., & Muntean, A. (2003). The Failure of Public Governance in Romania, Working Group 11th Annual NISPAcee Conference. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/nispacee/unpan009134.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2017.
  13. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Stănică, V. (2016). Probleme strategice de dezvoltare în mediul rural din Transilvania. Revista Transilvană de Științe Administrative, 2(39), 206–218.Google Scholar
  15. Țiclău, T., & Hințea, C. (2016). Administrative leadership and situational antecedents in the Romanian public administration. Lex Localis, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Toderaş N., & Stăvaru, A. M. (2015). Evaluation capacity building as a means to improving policy making and public service in higher education. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-08054-3_5.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Călin Emilian Hințea
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marius Constantin Profiroiu
    • 2
  • Tudor Cristian Țiclău
    • 1
  1. 1.Babeș-Bolyai UniversityCluj-NapocaRomania
  2. 2.Bucharest University of Economic StudiesBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations