Public sector reform has arguably been one of the defining features of the public policy landscape for the past three decades (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2011). Public organizations are faced with an ever-increasing array of problems, are expected to implement and develop strategies necessary to respond in an efficient manner to complex social, economic and political challenges. At the same time, there are numerous instances where they are seen as part or even the source for these problems. Thus, public organizations are a constant subject to rigorous and extensive management reforms (Andrews et al. 2013, 2014).
- Andrews, R., Downe, J., & Guarneros-Meza, V. (2013). Public management reform and social cohesion in Europe: An empirical analysis. Paper presented at the international research symposium on public management conference 2013. http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Deliverable-6.1.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2015.
- Andrews, R, Jilke, S. R, & Van de Walle, S. G. J. (2014, forthcoming). Economic strain and perceptions of social cohesion in Europe: Does institutional trust matter? European Journal of Political Research. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1765/50346
- Drechsler, W. (2005). The rise and demise of the new public management. Post-Autistic Economics Review, 33, 14. http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue33/Drechsler33.htm. Accessed 20 May 2014.
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pollitt, C., van Thiel, S., & Homburg, V. (Eds.). (2007). New public management in Europe: Adaptations and alternatives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar